These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

132 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31978884)

  • 21. A comparison of modern-era anterior lumbar interbody fusion and minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion at the lumbosacral junction.
    Farber SH; Dugan RK; White MD; Walker CT; O'Neill LK; Alan N; Zhou JJ; Turner JD; Tumialán LM; Uribe JS
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2023 Dec; 39(6):785-792. PubMed ID: 37548527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Robot-Assisted Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion in the Treatment of Lumbar Spondylolisthesis.
    Cui GY; Han XG; Wei Y; Liu YJ; He D; Sun YQ; Liu B; Tian W
    Orthop Surg; 2021 Oct; 13(7):1960-1968. PubMed ID: 34516712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Minimally invasive versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: comparison of clinical outcomes among obese patients.
    Terman SW; Yee TJ; Lau D; Khan AA; La Marca F; Park P
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2014 Jun; 20(6):644-52. PubMed ID: 24745355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Comparison of (Partial) economic evaluations of transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) versus Posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) in adults with lumbar spondylolisthesis: A systematic review.
    Caelers IJMH; de Kunder SL; Rijkers K; van Hemert WLW; de Bie RA; Evers SMAA; van Santbrink H
    PLoS One; 2021; 16(2):e0245963. PubMed ID: 33571291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Modeled cost-effectiveness of transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion compared with posterolateral fusion for spondylolisthesis using N(2)QOD data.
    Carreon LY; Glassman SD; Ghogawala Z; Mummaneni PV; McGirt MJ; Asher AL
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2016 Jun; 24(6):916-21. PubMed ID: 26895529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Midline lumbar interbody fusion: a review of the surgical technique and outcomes.
    Alentado VJ; Mobasser D; Mobasser JP; Potts EA
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2023 Oct; 39(4):462-470. PubMed ID: 37410607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Lateral lumbar interbody fusion in revision surgery for restenosis after posterior decompression.
    Kudo Y; Okano I; Toyone T; Matsuoka A; Maruyama H; Yamamura R; Ishikawa K; Hayakawa C; Tani S; Sekimizu M; Hoshino Y; Ozawa T; Shirahata T; Fujita M; Oshita Y; Emori H; Omata H; Inagaki K
    Neurosurg Focus; 2020 Sep; 49(3):E11. PubMed ID: 32871574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Comparative analysis of perioperative surgical site infection after minimally invasive versus open posterior/transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: analysis of hospital billing and discharge data from 5170 patients.
    McGirt MJ; Parker SL; Lerner J; Engelhart L; Knight T; Wang MY
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2011 Jun; 14(6):771-8. PubMed ID: 21417699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. [Comparison of mid-term effectiveness of unilateral biportal endoscopy-transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion with minimally invasive surgery-transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion assisted with three-dimensional microscope in treating lumbar spondylolisthesis].
    Yu Y; Wang Y; Xie Y; Xu J; Chen Y; Fan X
    Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2023 Jan; 37(1):52-58. PubMed ID: 36708116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. A comparison of minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion and decompression alone for degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis.
    Chan AK; Bisson EF; Bydon M; Glassman SD; Foley KT; Potts EA; Shaffrey CI; Shaffrey ME; Coric D; Knightly JJ; Park P; Wang MY; Fu KM; Slotkin JR; Asher AL; Virk MS; Kerezoudis P; Alvi MA; Guan J; Haid RW; Mummaneni PV
    Neurosurg Focus; 2019 May; 46(5):E13. PubMed ID: 31042655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. May the midline lumbar interbody fusion (MIDLIF) prevent the early radiographic adjacent segment degeneration? A minimum 3-year follow-up comparative study of MIDLIF in L4/5 with cortical bone trajectory screw versus traditional pedicle screw fixation.
    Han B; Ding H; Hai Y; Liu Y; Guan L; Pan A; Zhang X; Yin P
    BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2022 May; 23(1):480. PubMed ID: 35596180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Minimally invasive versus open fusion for Grade I degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis: analysis of the Quality Outcomes Database.
    Mummaneni PV; Bisson EF; Kerezoudis P; Glassman S; Foley K; Slotkin JR; Potts E; Shaffrey M; Shaffrey CI; Coric D; Knightly J; Park P; Fu KM; Devin CJ; Chotai S; Chan AK; Virk M; Asher AL; Bydon M
    Neurosurg Focus; 2017 Aug; 43(2):E11. PubMed ID: 28760035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Benefit of Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion vs Posterolateral Spinal Fusion in Lumbar Spine Disorders: A Propensity-Matched Analysis From the National Neurosurgical Quality and Outcomes Database Registry.
    Glassman SD; Carreon LY; Ghogawala Z; Foley KT; McGirt MJ; Asher AL
    Neurosurgery; 2016 Sep; 79(3):397-405. PubMed ID: 26579968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Perioperative outcomes and adverse events of minimally invasive versus open posterior lumbar fusion: meta-analysis and systematic review.
    Goldstein CL; Macwan K; Sundararajan K; Rampersaud YR
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2016 Mar; 24(3):416-27. PubMed ID: 26565767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. A protocol of a randomized controlled multicenter trial for surgical treatment of lumbar spondylolisthesis: the Lumbar Interbody Fusion Trial (LIFT).
    de Kunder SL; Rijkers K; van Kuijk SM; Evers SM; de Bie RA; van Santbrink H
    BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2016 Oct; 17(1):417. PubMed ID: 27716168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. [Prospective comparative study of unilateral biportal endoscopic transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion and endoscopic transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for treatment of single-segment degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis with lumbar spondylolisthesis].
    Wu D; Shu T; Lu Q; Shen M
    Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2024 May; 38(5):521-528. PubMed ID: 38752236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Minimally invasive versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for grade I lumbar spondylolisthesis: 5-year follow-up from the prospective multicenter Quality Outcomes Database registry.
    Chan AK; Bydon M; Bisson EF; Glassman SD; Foley KT; Shaffrey CI; Potts EA; Shaffrey ME; Coric D; Knightly JJ; Park P; Wang MY; Fu KM; Slotkin JR; Asher AL; Virk MS; Michalopoulos GD; Guan J; Haid RW; Agarwal N; Park C; Chou D; Mummaneni PV
    Neurosurg Focus; 2023 Jan; 54(1):E2. PubMed ID: 36587409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) for open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a retrospective propensity-matched cohort study.
    Porche K; Samra R; Melnick K; Brennan M; Vaziri S; Seubert C; Polifka A; Hoh DJ; Mohamed B
    Spine J; 2022 Mar; 22(3):399-410. PubMed ID: 34687905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Comparative Analysis of Two Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion Techniques: Open TLIF Versus Wiltse MIS TLIF.
    Ge DH; Stekas ND; Varlotta CG; Fischer CR; Petrizzo A; Protopsaltis TS; Passias PG; Errico TJ; Buckland AJ
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2019 May; 44(9):E555-E560. PubMed ID: 30325884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Unilateral biportal endoscopic lumbar interbody fusion enhanced the recovery of patients with the lumbar degenerative disease compared with the conventional posterior procedures: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Yang H; Cheng F; Hai Y; Liu Y; Pan A
    Front Neurol; 2022; 13():1089981. PubMed ID: 36703632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.