These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

262 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31980204)

  • 1. Internal and marginal discrepancies associated with stereolithography (SLA) additively manufactured zirconia crowns.
    Revilla-León M; Methani MM; Morton D; Zandinejad A
    J Prosthet Dent; 2020 Dec; 124(6):730-737. PubMed ID: 31980204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Manufacturing accuracy and volumetric changes of stereolithography additively manufactured zirconia with different porosities.
    Revilla-León M; Mostafavi D; Methani MM; Zandinejad A
    J Prosthet Dent; 2022 Aug; 128(2):211-215. PubMed ID: 33573829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Accuracy of zirconia crown manufactured using stereolithography and digital light processing.
    Lee HB; Noh MJ; Bae EJ; Lee WS; Kim JH
    J Dent; 2024 Feb; 141():104834. PubMed ID: 38217958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The Flexural Strength and Flexural Modulus of Stereolithography Additively Manufactured Zirconia with Different Porosities.
    Zandinejad A; Das O; Barmak AB; Kuttolamadom M; Revilla-León M
    J Prosthodont; 2022 Jun; 31(5):434-440. PubMed ID: 34580962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effect of modifying occlusal cement spacer on the fit accuracy of digitally manufactured zirconia crowns.
    Ibrahim H; El Kateb M; Morsy N
    J Prosthet Dent; 2024 Jan; 131(1):93.e1-93.e6. PubMed ID: 37867014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Accuracy of three digital workflows for implant abutment and crown fabrication using a digital measuring technique.
    Zeller S; Guichet D; Kontogiorgos E; Nagy WW
    J Prosthet Dent; 2019 Feb; 121(2):276-284. PubMed ID: 30396709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Flexural strength and Weibull characteristics of stereolithography additive manufactured versus milled zirconia.
    Revilla-León M; Al-Haj Husain N; Ceballos L; Özcan M
    J Prosthet Dent; 2021 Apr; 125(4):685-690. PubMed ID: 32434662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Trueness of stereolithography ZrO
    Lee HB; Bea EJ; Lee WS; Kim JH
    Dent Mater J; 2023 Jan; 42(1):42-48. PubMed ID: 36288942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effect of digital scans on marginal and internal discrepancies of zirconia crowns.
    Kim SS; Jeong JH; Lee JI; Cho HW
    J Prosthet Dent; 2020 Oct; 124(4):461-467. PubMed ID: 31839327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effect of a new support design on the marginal and internal gap of additively manufactured interim crowns using direct light deposition technology.
    Khanlar LN; Francis C; Basir Barmak A; Rios ALS; Ashtiani RE; Zandinejad A
    J Prosthodont; 2024 Feb; 33(2):188-194. PubMed ID: 36810925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of marginal and internal fit of 3-unit zirconia frameworks fabricated with CAD-CAM technology using direct and indirect digital scans.
    Arezoobakhsh A; Shayegh SS; Jamali Ghomi A; Hakimaneh SMR
    J Prosthet Dent; 2020 Jan; 123(1):105-112. PubMed ID: 30982618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Marginal and Internal Fit of CAD/CAM Crowns Fabricated Over Reverse Tapered Preparations.
    Carbajal Mejía JB; Yatani H; Wakabayashi K; Nakamura T
    J Prosthodont; 2019 Feb; 28(2):e477-e484. PubMed ID: 29194841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Marginal fit of CAD-CAM monolithic zirconia crowns fabricated by using cone beam computed tomography scans.
    Kale E; Cilli M; Özçelik TB; Yilmaz B
    J Prosthet Dent; 2020 May; 123(5):731-737. PubMed ID: 31653403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Marginal and internal discrepancies associated with carbon digital light synthesis additively manufactured interim crowns.
    Khanlar LN; Barmak AB; Oh Y; Mendha U; Yared S; Zandinejad A
    J Prosthet Dent; 2023 Jul; 130(1):108.e1-108.e6. PubMed ID: 37210221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effect of Split-File Digital Workflow on Crown Margin Adaptation.
    Sheridan RR; Verrett R; Haney S; Schoolfield J
    J Prosthodont; 2017 Oct; 26(7):571-580. PubMed ID: 28598591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evaluation of the fit of zirconia copings fabricated by direct and indirect digital scanning procedures.
    Lee B; Oh KC; Haam D; Lee JH; Moon HS
    J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Aug; 120(2):225-231. PubMed ID: 29428522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Strength and Adaptation of Stereolithography-Fabricated Zirconia Dental Crowns: An In Vitro Study.
    Li R; Wang Y; Hu M; Wang Y; Xv Y; Liu Y; Sun Y
    Int J Prosthodont; 2019; 32(5):439-443. PubMed ID: 31486816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. In vitro evaluation of marginal discrepancy of monolithic zirconia restorations fabricated with different CAD-CAM systems.
    Hamza TA; Sherif RM
    J Prosthet Dent; 2017 Jun; 117(6):762-766. PubMed ID: 27836145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evaluation of the fit of metal copings fabricated using stereolithography.
    Kim SB; Kim NH; Kim JH; Moon HS
    J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Nov; 120(5):693-698. PubMed ID: 29807735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evaluation of fit and accuracy of single crowns fabricated from self-glazed zirconia compared with milled zirconia.
    Marouki C; Shamon A; Svanborg P
    J Prosthet Dent; 2024 Jun; 131(6):1105-1110. PubMed ID: 36959004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.