244 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31980291)
1. Similar Reproducibility for Strain and Shear Wave Elastography in Breast Mass Evaluation: A Prospective Study Using the Same Ultrasound System.
Zhang L; Dong YJ; Zhou JQ; Jia XH; Li S; Zhan WW
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2020 Apr; 46(4):981-991. PubMed ID: 31980291
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A qualitative and quantitative assessment of simultaneous strain, shear wave, and point shear wave elastography to distinguish malignant and benign breast lesions.
Altıntas Y; Bayrak M; Alabaz Ö; Celiktas M
Acta Radiol; 2021 Sep; 62(9):1155-1162. PubMed ID: 33070635
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Two-dimensional shear wave elastography of breast lesions: Comparison of two different systems.
Ren WW; Li XL; He YP; Li DD; Wang D; Zhao CK; Bo XW; Liu BJ; Yue WW; Xu HX
Clin Hemorheol Microcirc; 2017; 66(1):37-46. PubMed ID: 28211807
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Diagnostic values of shear wave elastography and strain elastography for breast lesions.
Jiang H; Yu X; Zhang L; Song L; Gao X
Rev Med Chil; 2020 Sep; 148(9):1239-1245. PubMed ID: 33399698
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Breast Elasticity Imaging Techniques: Comparison of Strain Elastography and Shear-Wave Elastography in the Same Population.
Jia W; Luo T; Dong Y; Zhang X; Zhan W; Zhou J
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2021 Jan; 47(1):104-113. PubMed ID: 33109379
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Shear-Wave Elastography of the Breast: Impact of Technical Image Quality Parameters on Diagnostic Accuracy.
Chou SS; Baikpour M; Zhang W; Mercaldo SF; Lehman CD; Samir AE
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2021 May; 216(5):1205-1215. PubMed ID: 33729888
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of diagnostic potential of shear wave elastography between breast mass lesions and non-mass-like lesions.
Li J; Liu Y; Li Y; Li S; Wang J; Zhu Y; Lu H
Eur J Radiol; 2023 Jan; 158():110609. PubMed ID: 36423364
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Shear-Wave Elastography: Could it be Helpful for the Diagnosis of Non-Mass-Like Breast Lesions?
Wang ZL; Li Y; Wan WB; Li N; Tang J
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2017 Jan; 43(1):83-90. PubMed ID: 27717515
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison and Combination of Strain and Shear Wave Elastography of Breast Masses for Differentiation of Benign and Malignant Lesions by Quantitative Assessment: Preliminary Study.
Seo M; Ahn HS; Park SH; Lee JB; Choi BI; Sohn YM; Shin SY
J Ultrasound Med; 2018 Jan; 37(1):99-109. PubMed ID: 28688156
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Does Shear Wave Elastography Score Over Strain Elastography in Breast Masses or Vice Versa?
Singla V; Prakash A; Prabhakar N; Singh T; Bal A; Singh G; Khandelwal N
Curr Probl Diagn Radiol; 2020; 49(2):96-101. PubMed ID: 30981528
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of 3D and 2D shear-wave elastography for differentiating benign and malignant breast masses: focus on the diagnostic performance.
Choi HY; Sohn YM; Seo M
Clin Radiol; 2017 Oct; 72(10):878-886. PubMed ID: 28526455
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Ultrasound shear wave elastography of breast lesions: correlation of anisotropy with clinical and histopathological findings.
Chen YL; Gao Y; Chang C; Wang F; Zeng W; Chen JJ
Cancer Imaging; 2018 Apr; 18(1):11. PubMed ID: 29622044
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Three-dimensional shear-wave elastography for differentiating benign and malignant breast lesions: comparison with two-dimensional shear-wave elastography.
Youk JH; Gweon HM; Son EJ; Chung J; Kim JA; Kim EK
Eur Radiol; 2013 Jun; 23(6):1519-27. PubMed ID: 23212276
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A set of shear wave elastography quantitative parameters combined with ultrasound BI-RADS to assess benign and malignant breast lesions.
Shi XQ; Li JL; Wan WB; Huang Y
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2015 Apr; 41(4):960-6. PubMed ID: 25701532
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Diagnostic performances of shear-wave elastography and B-mode ultrasound to differentiate benign and malignant breast lesions: the emphasis on the cutoff value of qualitative and quantitative parameters.
Song EJ; Sohn YM; Seo M
Clin Imaging; 2018; 50():302-307. PubMed ID: 29751202
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Diagnostic performance of quantitative shear wave elastography in the evaluation of solid breast masses: determination of the most discriminatory parameter.
Au FW; Ghai S; Moshonov H; Kahn H; Brennan C; Dua H; Crystal P
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2014 Sep; 203(3):W328-36. PubMed ID: 25148191
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Reproducibility and diagnostic performance of shear wave elastography in evaluating breast solid mass.
Hong S; Woo OH; Shin HS; Hwang SY; Cho KR; Seo BK
Clin Imaging; 2017; 44():42-45. PubMed ID: 28402836
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Accuracy of tumor size measurement: comparison of B-mode ultrasound, strain elastography, and 2D and 3D shear wave elastography with histopathological lesion size.
Farrokh A; Maass N; Treu L; Heilmann T; Schäfer FK
Acta Radiol; 2019 Apr; 60(4):451-458. PubMed ID: 30043622
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Application of 3D and 2D quantitative shear wave elastography (SWE) to differentiate between benign and malignant breast masses.
Tian J; Liu Q; Wang X; Xing P; Yang Z; Wu C
Sci Rep; 2017 Jan; 7():41216. PubMed ID: 28106134
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Simultaneous comparison between strain and shear wave elastography of breast masses for the differentiation of benign and malignant lesions by qualitative and quantitative assessments.
Fujioka T; Mori M; Kubota K; Kikuchi Y; Katsuta L; Kasahara M; Oda G; Ishiba T; Nakagawa T; Tateishi U
Breast Cancer; 2019 Nov; 26(6):792-798. PubMed ID: 31175605
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
