117 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31980416)
1. Is Dual-Axis Rotational Coronary Angiography Radiation Dose Reduction Achievable in a Population with 100% Suspected Coronary Artery Disease? A Randomized Trial.
Szarfer J; Albornoz F; Alonso A; Yurko V; Blanco F; Blanco R; Indavere A; Gigena G; Gagliardi J; Escudero AG
J Med Imaging Radiat Sci; 2020 Jun; 51(2):241-246. PubMed ID: 31980416
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A randomized trial comparing dual axis rotational versus conventional coronary angiography in a population with a high prevalence of coronary artery disease.
Giuberti RS; Caixeta A; Carvalho AC; Soares MM; Abreu-Silva EO; Pestana JO; Silva Júnior HT; Vaz ML; Généreux P; Fernandes RW
J Interv Cardiol; 2014 Oct; 27(5):456-64. PubMed ID: 25132588
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of the Effect of Dual-Axis Rotational Coronary Angiography Versus Conventional Coronary Angiography on Frequency of Acute Kidney Injury, X-Ray Exposure Time, and Quantity of Contrast Medium Injected.
Di Serafino L; Turturo M; Lanzone S; Marano M; Scognamiglio G; Trimarco B; Cirillo P; Esposito G; D'Agostino C
Am J Cardiol; 2018 May; 121(9):1046-1050. PubMed ID: 29519544
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Combining Optimized Image Processing With Dual Axis Rotational Angiography: Toward Low-Dose Invasive Coronary Angiography.
Buytaert D; Drieghe B; Van Heuverswyn F; De Pooter J; Gheeraert P; De Wolf D; Taeymans Y; Bacher K
J Am Heart Assoc; 2020 Jul; 9(13):e014683. PubMed ID: 32605408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Safety and efficacy of dual-axis rotational coronary angiography vs. standard coronary angiography.
Klein AJ; Garcia JA; Hudson PA; Kim MS; Messenger JC; Casserly IP; Wink O; Hattler B; Tsai TT; Chen SY; Hansgen A; Carroll JD
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2011 May; 77(6):820-7. PubMed ID: 20853352
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Usefulness of dual-axis rotational coronary angiography in primary percutaneous coronary intervention for patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction.
Suwa H; Koyabu Y; Adachi T; Kawai A; Kotani K; Toyoda S; Inoue T; Kato T
Heart Vessels; 2021 May; 36(5):621-629. PubMed ID: 33277662
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Benefits of dual-axis rotational coronary angiography in routine clinical practice.
Farshid A; Chandrasekhar J; McLean D
Heart Vessels; 2014 Mar; 29(2):199-205. PubMed ID: 23615833
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of diagnostic accuracy of dual-axis rotational versus standard coronary angiography.
Jin ZG; Bai R; Li Y; Yang Y; Han W; Zhao Q; Zhang L; Liu HL
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2020 Feb; 36(2):187-195. PubMed ID: 31628576
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Randomized study on the safety and efficacy of dual-axis rotational versus standard coronary angiography in.
Liu HL; Jin ZG; Yang SL; Luo JP; Ma DX; Liu Y; Han W
Chin Med J (Engl); 2012 Mar; 125(6):1016-22. PubMed ID: 22613524
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of a safety strategy using transradial access and dual-axis rotational coronary angiography with transfemoral access and standard coronary angiography.
Yasar AS; Perino AC; Dattilo PB; Casserly IP; Carroll JD; Messenger JC
J Interv Cardiol; 2013 Oct; 26(5):524-9. PubMed ID: 23952684
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Dual-axis rotational coronary angiography versus conventional coronary angiography: a randomized comparison.
Hell MM; Gilg MD; Röther J; Blachutzik F; Achenbach S; Schlundt C
Clin Res Cardiol; 2021 Feb; 110(2):258-269. PubMed ID: 32936322
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Dual-axis rotational coronary angiography can reduce peak skin dose and scattered dose: a phantom study.
Liu H; Jin Z; Deng Y; Jing L
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2014 Jul; 15(4):4805. PubMed ID: 25207409
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of dual-axis rotational coronary angiography (XPERSWING) versus conventional technique in routine practice.
Gómez-Menchero AE; Díaz JF; Sánchez-González C; Cardenal R; Sanghvi AB; Roa-Garrido J; Rodríguez-López JL
Rev Esp Cardiol (Engl Ed); 2012 May; 65(5):434-9. PubMed ID: 22465608
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of fluoro and cine coronary angiography: balancing acceptable outcomes with a reduction in radiation dose.
Olcay A; Guler E; Karaca IO; Omaygenc MO; Kizilirmak F; Olgun E; Yenipinar E; Cakmak HA; Duman D
J Invasive Cardiol; 2015 Apr; 27(4):199-202. PubMed ID: 25840403
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A randomized comparison of estimated radiation exposure between Low and conventional dose protocol during invasive coronary angiography (ERICA trial): Pilot study.
Park SM; Kim HC; Lee MS; Kim CY
Eur J Radiol; 2020 Aug; 129():109120. PubMed ID: 32599497
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Correlation between dual-axis rotational coronary angiography and intravascular ultrasound in a coronary lesion assessment.
Jin ZG; Zhang ZQ; Jing LM; Wei YJ; Zhang J; Luo JP; Yang SL; Ma DX; Liu Y; Han W; Yang Y; Liu HL
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2017 Feb; 33(2):153-160. PubMed ID: 27730313
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Enhanced stent visualization system for percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with chronic kidney disease: effects on contrast media volume and radiation exposure.
Tian Y; Zhao X; Yang Y; Cai X; Jian L; Guo S; Xia D; Chen X; Li C; Guo Q; Chen B; Lu C
BMC Cardiovasc Disord; 2022 Nov; 22(1):487. PubMed ID: 36380270
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Effect of reduced x-ray tube voltage, low iodine concentration contrast medium, and sinogram-affirmed iterative reconstruction on image quality and radiation dose at coronary CT angiography: results of the prospective multicenter REALISE trial.
Yin WH; Lu B; Gao JB; Li PL; Sun K; Wu ZF; Yang WJ; Zhang XQ; Zheng MW; McQuiston AD; Meinel FG; Schoepf UJ
J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr; 2015; 9(3):215-24. PubMed ID: 25843243
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Iterative reconstruction to preserve image quality and diagnostic accuracy at reduced radiation dose in coronary CT angiography: an intraindividual comparison.
Yin WH; Lu B; Li N; Han L; Hou ZH; Wu RZ; Wu YJ; Niu HX; Jiang SL; Krazinski AW; Ebersberger U; Meinel FG; Schoepf UJ
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2013 Dec; 6(12):1239-49. PubMed ID: 24269265
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Efficacy of Low-Dose Compared With Standard-Dose Radiation for Cardiac Catheterization and Intervention (KAR RAD Study).
Kar S; Teleb M; Albaghdadi A; Ibrahim A; Mukherjee D
J Invasive Cardiol; 2019 Jun; 31(6):187-194. PubMed ID: 30865914
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
