These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

140 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31981919)

  • 21. The long-term speech outcome in Flemish young adults after two different types of palatoplasty.
    Van Lierde KM; Monstrey S; Bonte K; Van Cauwenberge P; Vinck B
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2004 Jul; 68(7):865-75. PubMed ID: 15183576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Adaptation of nasometry to Hungarian language and experiences with its clinical application.
    Hirschberg J; Bók S; Juhász M; Trenovszki Z; Votisky P; Hirschberg A
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2006 May; 70(5):785-98. PubMed ID: 16246433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Same noses, different nasalance scores: data from normal subjects and cleft palate speakers for three systems for nasalance analysis.
    Bressmann T; Klaiman P; Fischbach S
    Clin Linguist Phon; 2006; 20(2-3):163-70. PubMed ID: 16428233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Nasalance scores for normal Korean-speaking adults and children.
    Park M; Baek WS; Lee E; Koh KS; Kim BK; Baek R
    J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2014 Feb; 67(2):173-7. PubMed ID: 24211114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Normal Patterns of Nasometric Values in Adult Jordanian Speakers of Arabic.
    Khwaileh FA; Alfwaress FSD
    J Craniofac Surg; 2018 Nov; 29(8):2043-2047. PubMed ID: 30015743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Examination of the standard deviation of mean nasalance scores in subjects with cleft palate: implications for clinical use.
    Vallino-Napoli LD; Montgomery AA
    Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 1997 Nov; 34(6):512-9. PubMed ID: 9431469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. [Normal nasalance for the German language. Nasometric values for clinical use in patients with cleft lip and palate].
    Küttner C; Schönweiler R; Seeberger B; Dempf R; Lisson J; Ptok M
    HNO; 2003 Feb; 51(2):151-6. PubMed ID: 12589422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The effect of vowels on nasalance scores.
    Lewis KE; Watterson T; Quint T
    Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 2000 Nov; 37(6):584-9. PubMed ID: 11108528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Nasalance levels in the speech of normal Australian children.
    van Doorn J; Purcell A
    Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 1998 Jul; 35(4):287-92. PubMed ID: 9684764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Investigating the Effects of Glottal Stop Productions on Voice in Children With Cleft Palate Using Multidimensional Voice Assessment Methods.
    Aydınlı FE; Özcebe E; Kulak Kayıkçı ME; Yılmaz T; Özgür FF
    J Voice; 2016 Nov; 30(6):763.e9-763.e15. PubMed ID: 26739858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The relationship between nasalance scores and nasality ratings obtained with equal appearing interval and direct magnitude estimation scaling methods.
    Brancamp TU; Lewis KE; Watterson T
    Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 2010 Nov; 47(6):631-7. PubMed ID: 20500059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Application of linear discriminant analysis to the nasometric assessment of resonance disorders: a pilot study.
    de Boer G; Bressmann T
    Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 2015 Mar; 52(2):173-82. PubMed ID: 25714268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Nasality evaluation of Turkish phonemes in vowel-consonant combinations.
    Sarac ET; Kayikci ME; Ozkan S
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2011 Jul; 75(7):894-8. PubMed ID: 21612830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Normative nasalance scores in the production of words and syllables for Brazilian Portuguese speakers.
    Sampaio-Teixeira ACM; Oliveira DN; Yamashita RP; Fukushiro AP; Trindade IEK
    Clin Linguist Phon; 2019; 33(12):1139-1148. PubMed ID: 30894033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Comparison of nasal acceleration and nasalance across vowels.
    Thorp EB; Virnik BT; Stepp CE
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2013 Oct; 56(5):1476-84. PubMed ID: 23838984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Evaluation of the progress of therapy in patients with cleft lip, jaw and palate, using voice analysis--a pilot study.
    Gugsch C; Dannhauer KH; Fuchs M
    J Orofac Orthop; 2008 Jul; 69(4):257-67. PubMed ID: 18797830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Voice low tone to high tone ratio: a potential quantitative index for vowel [a:] and its nasalization.
    Lee GS; Wang CP; Yang CC; Kuo TB
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2006 Jul; 53(7):1437-9. PubMed ID: 16830950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Nasalance scores for typical Irish English-speaking adults.
    Lee A; Browne U
    Logoped Phoniatr Vocol; 2013 Dec; 38(4):167-72. PubMed ID: 22577843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Influence of treatment concept, velopharyngoplasty, gender and age on hypernasality in patients with cleft lip, alveolus and palate.
    Joos U; Wermker K; Kruse-Löesler B; Kleinheinz J
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2006 Dec; 34(8):472-7. PubMed ID: 17157520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. SISL (ScreeningsInstrument Schisis Leuven): assessment of cleft palate speech, resonance and myofunction.
    Breuls M; Sell D; Manders E; Boulet E; Vander Poorten V
    B-ENT; 2006; 2 Suppl 4():71-84. PubMed ID: 17366851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.