These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

135 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31982245)

  • 1. Visualization tool of variable selection in bias-variance tradeoff for inverse probability weights.
    Yu YH; Filion KB; Bodnar LM; Brooks MM; Platt RW; Himes KP; Naimi AI
    Ann Epidemiol; 2020 Jan; 41():56-59. PubMed ID: 31982245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Propensity score weighting under limited overlap and model misspecification.
    Zhou Y; Matsouaka RA; Thomas L
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2020 Dec; 29(12):3721-3756. PubMed ID: 32693715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Model misspecification and bias for inverse probability weighting estimators of average causal effects.
    Waernbaum I; Pazzagli L
    Biom J; 2023 Feb; 65(2):e2100118. PubMed ID: 36045099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effect Estimation in Point-Exposure Studies with Binary Outcomes and High-Dimensional Covariate Data - A Comparison of Targeted Maximum Likelihood Estimation and Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting.
    Pang M; Schuster T; Filion KB; Schnitzer ME; Eberg M; Platt RW
    Int J Biostat; 2016 Nov; 12(2):. PubMed ID: 27889705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Data-Adaptive Selection of the Propensity Score Truncation Level for Inverse-Probability-Weighted and Targeted Maximum Likelihood Estimators of Marginal Point Treatment Effects.
    Gruber S; Phillips RV; Lee H; van der Laan MJ
    Am J Epidemiol; 2022 Aug; 191(9):1640-1651. PubMed ID: 35512316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. High-dimensional propensity score algorithm in comparative effectiveness research with time-varying interventions.
    Neugebauer R; Schmittdiel JA; Zhu Z; Rassen JA; Seeger JD; Schneeweiss S
    Stat Med; 2015 Feb; 34(5):753-81. PubMed ID: 25488047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Variance reduction in the inverse probability weighted estimators for the average treatment effect using the propensity score.
    Liao J; Rohde C
    Biometrics; 2022 Jun; 78(2):660-667. PubMed ID: 33715153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Postmyocardial Infarction Statin Exposure and the Risk of Stroke with Weighting for Outcome Misclassification.
    Gravel CA; Filion KB; Reynier PM; Platt RW
    Epidemiology; 2020 Nov; 31(6):880-888. PubMed ID: 33003152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparing the performance of propensity score methods in healthcare database studies with rare outcomes.
    Franklin JM; Eddings W; Austin PC; Stuart EA; Schneeweiss S
    Stat Med; 2017 May; 36(12):1946-1963. PubMed ID: 28208229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Missing Data in Marginal Structural Models: A Plasmode Simulation Study Comparing Multiple Imputation and Inverse Probability Weighting.
    Liu SH; Chrysanthopoulou SA; Chang Q; Hunnicutt JN; Lapane KL
    Med Care; 2019 Mar; 57(3):237-243. PubMed ID: 30664611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Propensity score trimming mitigates bias due to covariate measurement error in inverse probability of treatment weighted analyses: A plasmode simulation.
    Conover MM; Rothman KJ; Stürmer T; Ellis AR; Poole C; Jonsson Funk M
    Stat Med; 2021 Apr; 40(9):2101-2112. PubMed ID: 33622016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A comparison of entropy balance and probability weighting methods to generalize observational cohorts to a population: a simulation and empirical example.
    Harvey RA; Hayden JD; Kamble PS; Bouchard JR; Huang JC
    Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf; 2017 Apr; 26(4):368-377. PubMed ID: 27859943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Impact of outcome model misspecification on regression and doubly-robust inverse probability weighting to estimate causal effect.
    Lefebvre G; Gustafson P
    Int J Biostat; 2010; 6(2):Article 15. PubMed ID: 21969999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Addressing Extreme Propensity Scores in Estimating Counterfactual Survival Functions via the Overlap Weights.
    Cheng C; Li F; Thomas LE; Li FF
    Am J Epidemiol; 2022 May; 191(6):1140-1151. PubMed ID: 35238335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Propensity score analysis with partially observed covariates: How should multiple imputation be used?
    Leyrat C; Seaman SR; White IR; Douglas I; Smeeth L; Kim J; Resche-Rigon M; Carpenter JR; Williamson EJ
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2019 Jan; 28(1):3-19. PubMed ID: 28573919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Variance estimation for stratified propensity score estimators.
    Williamson EJ; Morley R; Lucas A; Carpenter JR
    Stat Med; 2012 Jul; 31(15):1617-32. PubMed ID: 22362427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Interval-cohort designs and bias in the estimation of per-protocol effects: a simulation study.
    Young JG; Vatsa R; Murray EJ; Hernán MA
    Trials; 2019 Sep; 20(1):552. PubMed ID: 31488202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Instrumental variables and inverse probability weighting for causal inference from longitudinal observational studies.
    Hogan JW; Lancaster T
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2004 Feb; 13(1):17-48. PubMed ID: 14746439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Addressing Extreme Propensity Scores via the Overlap Weights.
    Li F; Thomas LE; Li F
    Am J Epidemiol; 2019 Jan; 188(1):250-257. PubMed ID: 30189042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A Simulation Study Comparing the Performance of Time-Varying Inverse Probability Weighting and G-Computation in Survival Analysis.
    Rudolph JE; Schisterman EF; Naimi AI
    Am J Epidemiol; 2023 Jan; 192(1):102-110. PubMed ID: 36124667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.