These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

395 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31982541)

  • 1. Title, abstract, and keyword searching resulted in poor recovery of articles in systematic reviews of epidemiologic practice.
    Penning de Vries BBL; van Smeden M; Rosendaal FR; Groenwold RHH
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2020 May; 121():55-61. PubMed ID: 31982541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The strong focus on positive results in abstracts may cause bias in systematic reviews: a case study on abstract reporting bias.
    Duyx B; Swaen GMH; Urlings MJE; Bouter LM; Zeegers MP
    Syst Rev; 2019 Jul; 8(1):174. PubMed ID: 31315665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Handsearching and electronic search of clinical trials in Cuban medical journals: analysis of terminology.
    Torres-Pombert A; Santana-Arroyo S
    Medwave; 2019 Mar; 19(2):e7603. PubMed ID: 30973846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Natural language processing was effective in assisting rapid title and abstract screening when updating systematic reviews.
    Qin X; Liu J; Wang Y; Liu Y; Deng K; Ma Y; Zou K; Li L; Sun X
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2021 May; 133():121-129. PubMed ID: 33485929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Handsearching versus electronic searching to identify reports of randomized trials.
    Hopewell S; Clarke M; Lefebvre C; Scherer R
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2007 Apr; 2007(2):MR000001. PubMed ID: 17443625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Unsupervised title and abstract screening for systematic review: a retrospective case-study using topic modelling methodology.
    Natukunda A; Muchene LK
    Syst Rev; 2023 Jan; 12(1):1. PubMed ID: 36597132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A simplified search strategy for identifying randomised controlled trials for systematic reviews of health care interventions: a comparison with more exhaustive strategies.
    Royle P; Waugh N
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2005 Jul; 5():23. PubMed ID: 16042789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The Medline/full-text research project.
    McKinin EJ; Sievert M; Johnson ED; Mitchell JA
    J Am Soc Inf Sci; 1991 May; 42(4):297-307. PubMed ID: 10111576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The structural and content aspects of abstracts versus bodies of full text journal articles are different.
    Cohen KB; Johnson HL; Verspoor K; Roeder C; Hunter LE
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2010 Sep; 11():492. PubMed ID: 20920264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The capture-mark-recapture technique can be used as a stopping rule when searching in systematic reviews.
    Kastner M; Straus SE; McKibbon KA; Goldsmith CH
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2009 Feb; 62(2):149-57. PubMed ID: 18722088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Is searching full text more effective than searching abstracts?
    Lin J
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2009 Feb; 10():46. PubMed ID: 19192280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Work-related outcomes in randomized, double blind, placebo-controlled trials in osteoarthritis - are they adequately reported in journal publications? A systematic review.
    Sowah D; Balat F; Straube S
    J Occup Med Toxicol; 2018; 13():32. PubMed ID: 30377437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Information content in Medline record fields.
    Kostoff RN; Block JA; Stump JA; Pfeil KM
    Int J Med Inform; 2004 Jun; 73(6):515-27. PubMed ID: 15171980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A Critical Review of Search Strategies Used in Recent Systematic Reviews Published in Selected Prosthodontic and Implant-Related Journals: Are Systematic Reviews Actually Systematic?
    Layton D
    Int J Prosthodont; 2017; 30(1):13-21. PubMed ID: 28085971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Established search filters may miss studies when identifying randomized controlled trials.
    Cooper C; Varley-Campbell J; Carter P
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2019 Aug; 112():12-19. PubMed ID: 30986533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A comparison of metrics and performance characteristics of different search strategies for article retrieval for a systematic review of the global epidemiology of kidney and urinary diseases.
    Bikbov B; Perico N; Remuzzi G;
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2018 Oct; 18(1):110. PubMed ID: 30340535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Can electronic search engines optimize screening of search results in systematic reviews: an empirical study.
    Sampson M; Barrowman NJ; Moher D; Clifford TJ; Platt RW; Morrison A; Klassen TP; Zhang L
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2006 Feb; 6():7. PubMed ID: 16504110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Abstracts in high profile journals often fail to report harm.
    Bernal-Delgado E; Fisher ES
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2008 Mar; 8():14. PubMed ID: 18371200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Assignment of adverse event indexing terms in randomized clinical trials involving spinal manipulative therapy: an audit of records in MEDLINE and EMBASE databases.
    Gorrell LM; Engel RM; Lystad RP; Brown BT
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2017 Mar; 17(1):41. PubMed ID: 28292267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Retrieval of publications addressing shared decision making: an evaluation of full-text searches on medical journal websites.
    Blanc X; Collet TH; Auer R; Iriarte P; Krause J; Légaré F; Cornuz J; Clair C
    JMIR Res Protoc; 2015 Apr; 4(2):e38. PubMed ID: 25854180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 20.