These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

144 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31982935)

  • 1. Visual feedback is not important for bimanual human interval timing.
    Studenka BE; Cummins DL; Myers K
    Psychol Res; 2021 Mar; 85(2):857-864. PubMed ID: 31982935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Crossing the arms confuses the clocks: sensory feedback and the bimanual advantage.
    Studenka BE; Eliasz KL; Shore DI; Balasubramaniam R
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2014 Apr; 21(2):390-7. PubMed ID: 23943555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The role of multiple internal timekeepers and sources of feedback on interval timing.
    Studenka BE; Cummins DL; Pope MA
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2018 Sep; 71(9):1960-1967. PubMed ID: 28854855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The role of sensory information in the production of periodic finger-tapping sequences.
    Billon M; Semjen A; Cole J; Gauthier G
    Exp Brain Res; 1996 Jun; 110(1):117-30. PubMed ID: 8817263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Reduced timing variability during bimanual coupling: a role for sensory information.
    Drewing K; Aschersleben G
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 2003 Feb; 56(2):329-50. PubMed ID: 12613567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The contribution of tactile reafference to temporal regularity during bimanual finger tapping.
    Drewing K; Hennings M; Aschersleben G
    Psychol Res; 2002 Feb; 66(1):60-70. PubMed ID: 11963279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Timing of bimanual movements and deafferentation: implications for the role of sensory movement effects.
    Drewing K; Stenneken P; Cole J; Prinz W; Aschersleben G
    Exp Brain Res; 2004 Sep; 158(1):50-7. PubMed ID: 15007586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Visual and tactile action effects determine bimanual coordination performance.
    Janczyk M; Skirde S; Weigelt M; Kunde W
    Hum Mov Sci; 2009 Aug; 28(4):437-49. PubMed ID: 19395106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Is proprioception important for the timing of motor activities?
    LaRue J; Bard C; Fleury M; Teasdale N; Paillard J; Forget R; Lamarre Y
    Can J Physiol Pharmacol; 1995 Feb; 73(2):255-61. PubMed ID: 7621364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Dynamic Multisensory Integration: Somatosensory Speed Trumps Visual Accuracy during Feedback Control.
    Crevecoeur F; Munoz DP; Scott SH
    J Neurosci; 2016 Aug; 36(33):8598-611. PubMed ID: 27535908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Visual proprioception in the timing of movements: evidence from deafferentation.
    Stenneken P; Prinz W; Bosbach S; Aschersleben G
    Neuroreport; 2006 Apr; 17(5):545-8. PubMed ID: 16543823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effects of feedback from active and passive body parts on spatial and temporal parameters in sensorimotor synchronization.
    Keller PE; Ishihara M; Prinz W
    Cogn Process; 2011 Feb; 12(1):127-33. PubMed ID: 20306115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Force control in the absence of visual and tactile feedback.
    Mugge W; Abbink DA; Schouten AC; van der Helm FC; Arendzen JH; Meskers CG
    Exp Brain Res; 2013 Feb; 224(4):635-45. PubMed ID: 23223780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Psychophysical Evaluation of Proprioceptive Feedback Through a Probe Sliding on the Forearm Skin of Healthy Humans.
    Devecioğlu İ
    Ann Biomed Eng; 2022 Aug; 50(8):991-1000. PubMed ID: 35581510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Abstract spatial, but not body-related, visual information guides bimanual coordination.
    Brandes J; Rezvani F; Heed T
    Sci Rep; 2017 Dec; 7(1):16732. PubMed ID: 29196722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Asymmetric control of force and symmetric control of timing in bimanual finger tapping.
    Inui N; Hatta H
    Hum Mov Sci; 2002 Jul; 21(2):131-46. PubMed ID: 12167295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The interaction of visual and proprioceptive inputs in pointing to actual and remembered targets in Parkinson's disease.
    Adamovich SV; Berkinblit MB; Hening W; Sage J; Poizner H
    Neuroscience; 2001; 104(4):1027-41. PubMed ID: 11457588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Upper limb asymmetries in the matching of proprioceptive versus visual targets.
    Goble DJ; Brown SH
    J Neurophysiol; 2008 Jun; 99(6):3063-74. PubMed ID: 18436632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Tactile Gap Detection Deteriorates during Bimanual Symmetrical Movements under Mirror Visual Feedback.
    Bultitude JH; Juravle G; Spence C
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(1):e0146077. PubMed ID: 26731117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Tapping with peripheral nerve block. a role for tactile feedback in the timing of movements.
    Aschersleben G; Gehrke J; Prinz W
    Exp Brain Res; 2001 Feb; 136(3):331-9. PubMed ID: 11243475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.