These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

154 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3198330)

  • 1. Does dilution of contrast media affect contrast enhancement? An experimental study in rats.
    Dean PB; Kivisaari L; Kormano M
    Invest Radiol; 1988 Sep; 23 Suppl 1():S118-21. PubMed ID: 3198330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Contrast enhancement pharmacokinetics of six ionic and nonionic contrast media.
    Dean PB; Kivisaari L; Kormano M
    Invest Radiol; 1983; 18(4):368-74. PubMed ID: 6618828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. CT-determined canine kidney and urine iodine concentration following intravenous administration of sodium diatrizoate, metrizamide, iopamidol, and sodium ioxaglate.
    Brennan RE; Rapoport S; Weinberg I; Pollack HM; Curtis JA
    Invest Radiol; 1982; 17(1):95-100. PubMed ID: 7076442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of diatrizoate, iopamidol, and ioxaglate for the contrast enhancement of experimental hepatic tumors in CT.
    Burgener FA; Steinmetz SD
    Invest Radiol; 1985 Sep; 20(6):626-31. PubMed ID: 4066232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Tissue fluid shifts during renal arteriography with conventional and low osmolality agents.
    Morris TW; Harnish PP; Reece K; Katzberg RW
    Invest Radiol; 1983; 18(4):335-40. PubMed ID: 6618823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The effect of iodinated contrast agent properties on renal kinetics and oxygenation.
    Lenhard DC; Frisk AL; Lengsfeld P; Pietsch H; Jost G
    Invest Radiol; 2013 Apr; 48(4):175-82. PubMed ID: 23262792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Physicochemical parameters of x-ray contrast media.
    Krause W; Miklautz H; Kollenkirchen U; Heimann G
    Invest Radiol; 1994 Jan; 29(1):72-80. PubMed ID: 8144342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Renal excretion and computed tomography enhancement of iotrolan and iopamidol in dogs.
    Benness G; Evill C; Wilcox J; Hassam R; Arozoo E
    Fortschr Geb Rontgenstrahlen Nuklearmed Erganzungsbd; 1989; 128():88-90. PubMed ID: 2568815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Clinical comparison of Hexabrix, iopamidol, and Urografin-60 in whole body computed tomography.
    Spataro RF; Fischer HW; Kormano M
    Invest Radiol; 1984; 19(6 Suppl):S372-5. PubMed ID: 6511276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Pharmacokinetics of iohexol, iopamidol, iopromide, and iosimide compared with meglumine diatrizoate.
    Hartwig P; Mützel W; Taenzer V
    Fortschr Geb Rontgenstrahlen Nuklearmed Erganzungsbd; 1989; 128():220-3. PubMed ID: 2568800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Pharmacokinetics of contrast media: experimental results in dog and man with CT implications.
    Gardeur D; Lautrou J; Millard JC; Berger N; Metzger J
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 1980 Apr; 4(2):178-85. PubMed ID: 7365016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Renal clearance of an ionic high-osmolar and a nonionic low-osmolar contrast medium.
    Thomsen HS; Vestergaard A; Nielsen SL; Fogh-Andersen N; Golman K; Dorph S
    Invest Radiol; 1991 Jun; 26(6):564-8. PubMed ID: 1860763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparative cytotoxicity of low- and high-osmolar contrast media to human fibroblasts and rat mesangial cells in culture.
    Potier M; Lagroye I; Lakhdar B; Cambar J; Idee JM
    Invest Radiol; 1997 Oct; 32(10):621-6. PubMed ID: 9342122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effects of radiographic contrast media on monolayer cell cultures.
    Nordby A; Halgunset J; Haugen OA
    Invest Radiol; 1986 Mar; 21(3):234-9. PubMed ID: 3957597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Contrast enhancement of the liver and blood. Nonionic versus ionic contrast media in the pig.
    Jensen LI; Golman K; Nyman U; Dean PB
    Invest Radiol; 1985 Dec; 20(9):989-94. PubMed ID: 4077451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effects of contrast media on aortic endothelium. Experiments in the rat with non-ionic monomeric and monoacidic dimeric contrast media.
    Nyman U; Almén T
    Acta Radiol Suppl; 1980; 362():65-71. PubMed ID: 6168170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of diatrizoate, iopamidol, and ioxaglate for arterial portography. An experimental study in normal dogs and dogs with portal hypertension.
    Burgener FA; Gutierrez OH
    Invest Radiol; 1985 Jul; 20(4):399-402. PubMed ID: 4044182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Dynamic contrast enhancement of the upper abdomen: effect of contrast medium and body weight.
    Kormano M; Partanen K; Soimakallio S; Kivimäki T
    Invest Radiol; 1983; 18(4):364-7. PubMed ID: 6618827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effects of intravenous administration of a new nonionic dimeric contrast medium on the coronary circulation. Comparison with monomeric ionic and nonionic media.
    Lanzer P; Dean PB; Lipton MJ; Sievers R; Botvinick E; Higgins CB
    Invest Radiol; 1985 Oct; 20(7):746-50. PubMed ID: 4066245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Relative uptake of low- and high-osmolality contrast media in CT of brain tumors.
    Fike JR; Cann CE; Norman D; Turrel JM; LeCouteur RA; Pflugfelder CM; Borcich JK
    AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 1984; 5(4):413-7. PubMed ID: 6431776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.