124 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31983634)
1. The effects of physical photostimulable phosphor plate artifacts on the radiologic interpretation of periapical inflammatory disease.
Thang TST; Kishen A; Moayedi M; Tyrrell PN; Zhao W; Perschbacher SE
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol; 2020 Jun; 129(6):621-628. PubMed ID: 31983634
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Analysis of photostimulable phosphor plate image artifacts in an oral and maxillofacial radiology department.
Chiu HL; Lin SH; Chen CH; Wang WC; Chen JY; Chen YK; Lin LM
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2008 Nov; 106(5):749-56. PubMed ID: 18547836
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Assessment of intraoral image artifacts related to photostimulable phosphor plates in a dentomaxillofacial radiology department.
Gulsahi A; Secgin CK
Niger J Clin Pract; 2016; 19(2):248-53. PubMed ID: 26856290
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of technique errors of intraoral radiographs taken on film v photostimulable phosphor (PSP) plates.
Zhang W; Huynh CP; Abramovitch K; Leon IL; Arvizu L
Tex Dent J; 2012 Jun; 129(6):589-96. PubMed ID: 22866414
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Analysis of photostimulable phosphor image plate artifacts and their prevalence.
Elkhateeb SM; Aloyouny AY; Omer MMS; Mansour SM
World J Clin Cases; 2022 Jan; 10(2):437-447. PubMed ID: 35097068
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Rating the extent of surface scratches on photostimulable storage phosphor plates in a dental school environment.
Kalathingal SM; Shrout MK; Comer C; Brady C
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2010 Mar; 39(3):179-83. PubMed ID: 20203281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A pilot study of the effects of a vacuum sealing barrier method for photostimulable phosphor plates regarding plate damage and prevention of microbiologic cross-contamination.
Peker I; Peker E; Basman A; Akca G; Odabas ME; Haciosmanoglu N; Altunkaynak B; Akarslan Z
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol; 2018 Sep; 126(3):283-290. PubMed ID: 29958935
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of Efficiency and Image Quality of Photostimulable Phosphor Plate and Charge-Coupled Device Receptors in Dental Radiography.
Zhang W; Huynh C; Jadhav A; Pinales J; Arvizu L; Tsai J; Flores N
J Dent Educ; 2019 Oct; 83(10):1205-1212. PubMed ID: 31235501
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Benefits of using a photostimulable phosphor plate protective device.
de Moura G; Vizzotto MB; Tiecher PFDS; Arús NA; Silveira HLDD
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2021 Sep; 50(6):20200339. PubMed ID: 33411592
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Some characteristics of solid-state and photo-stimulable phosphor detectors for intra-oral radiography.
Borg E
Swed Dent J Suppl; 1999; 139():i-viii, 1-67. PubMed ID: 10635104
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Hypochlorous acid and white vinegar: Artifact-free COVID-19 disinfection options for photostimulable storage phosphor plates.
Pamukcu U; Peker I
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol; 2022 Sep; 134(3):367-374. PubMed ID: 35869016
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Infection control in digital intraoral radiography: evaluation of microbiological contamination of photostimulable phosphor plates in barrier envelopes.
MacDonald DS; Waterfield JD
J Can Dent Assoc; 2011; 77():b93. PubMed ID: 21929948
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Perception versus reality-findings from a phosphor plate quality assurance study.
Buchanan A; Benton B; Carraway A; Looney S; Kalathingal S
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol; 2017 Apr; 123(4):496-501. PubMed ID: 28159585
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Analysis of the deterioration of photostimulable phosphor plates.
Souza-Pinto GN; Santaella GM; Coli AA; Oenning AC; Haiter-Neto F
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2020 Sep; 49(6):20190500. PubMed ID: 32302219
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The effect of image enhancements and dual observers on proximal caries detection.
Gray BM; Mol A; Zandona A; Tyndall D
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol; 2017 Apr; 123(4):e133-e139. PubMed ID: 28283097
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Storage phosphor plates: how durable are they as a digital dental radiographic system?
Bedard A; Davis TD; Angelopoulos C
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2004 May; 5(2):57-69. PubMed ID: 15150634
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Analysis of image defects in digital intraoral radiography based on photostimulable phosphor plates.
Tashiro M; Nakatani A; Sugiura K; Nakayama E
Oral Radiol; 2023 Apr; 39(2):355-363. PubMed ID: 35948784
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Computed Radiography Photostimulable Phosphor Plate Receptors: Effect on Grid Conversion Factors.
Noble LB; Culp MP
Radiol Technol; 2017 Nov; 89(2):121-126. PubMed ID: 29298916
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effect of 3 different disinfection methods on the image quality of photostimulable phosphor plates.
Buchanan A; Ghosh S; Kalathingal S; Dalsania H; Raina R
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol; 2024 Feb; 137(2):172-181. PubMed ID: 37926603
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Impact of ambient lighting intensity and duration on the signal-to-noise ratio of images from photostimulable phosphor plates processed using DenOptix and ScanX systems.
Ramamurthy R; Canning CF; Scheetz JP; Farman AG
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2004 Sep; 33(5):307-11. PubMed ID: 15585807
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
