These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

103 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31983780)

  • 1. Voting, deliberation and truth.
    Hartmann S; Rafiee Rad S
    Synthese; 2018; 195(3):1273-1293. PubMed ID: 31983780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. How a deliberative approach includes women in the decisions of screening mammography: a citizens' jury feasibility study in Andalusia, Spain.
    Baena-Cañada JM; Luque-Ribelles V; Quílez-Cutillas A; Rosado-Varela P; Benítez-Rodríguez E; Márquez-Calderón S; Rivera-Bautista JM
    BMJ Open; 2018 May; 8(5):e019852. PubMed ID: 29730621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A citizens' jury on euthanasia/assisted dying: Does informed deliberation change people's views?
    Walker S; Egan R; Young J; Jaye C; Jackson C
    Health Expect; 2020 Apr; 23(2):388-395. PubMed ID: 31820555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Virtue signalling and the Condorcet Jury theorem.
    Hill S; Garner RP
    Synthese; 2021; 199(5-6):14821-14841. PubMed ID: 34725526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Quorums enable optimal pooling of independent judgements in biological systems.
    Marshall JA; Kurvers RH; Krause J; Wolf M
    Elife; 2019 Feb; 8():. PubMed ID: 30758288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Ethical case deliberation and decision making.
    Gracia D
    Med Health Care Philos; 2003; 6(3):227-33. PubMed ID: 14620459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Attractive but guilty: deliberation and the physical attractiveness bias.
    Patry MW
    Psychol Rep; 2008 Jun; 102(3):727-33. PubMed ID: 18763443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. How Communication Can Make Voters Choose Less Well.
    Hahn U; von Sydow M; Merdes C
    Top Cogn Sci; 2019 Jan; 11(1):194-206. PubMed ID: 30585433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Review, deliberation, and voting: a study of selection decisions in a medical school admission committee.
    Elam CL; Stratton TD; Scott KL; Wilson JF; Lieber A
    Teach Learn Med; 2002; 14(2):98-103. PubMed ID: 12058553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The political gender gap: gender bias in facial inferences that predict voting behavior.
    Chiao JY; Bowman NE; Gill H
    PLoS One; 2008; 3(10):e3666. PubMed ID: 18974841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Exploring prospects of deliberation in intractable natural resource management conflicts.
    Johansson A; Lindahl KB; Zachrisson A
    J Environ Manage; 2022 Aug; 315():115205. PubMed ID: 35533469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Restructuring Deliberation Using a Cultural Theory Lens.
    Williams T
    Hastings Cent Rep; 2021 Nov; 51 Suppl 2():S62-S65. PubMed ID: 34905242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Facts versus values: why legislators vote against injury control laws.
    Lowenstein SR; Koziol-McLain J; Satterfield G; Orleans M
    J Trauma; 1993 Nov; 35(5):786-92; discussion 792-3. PubMed ID: 8230347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. When votes depend on who's listening: Voters' intragroup status and voting procedure predict representative endorsement in intergroup contexts.
    Teixeira CP; Demoulin S; Yzerbyt V
    Br J Soc Psychol; 2015 Dec; 54(4):695-711. PubMed ID: 25809848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Experimental research on jury decision-making.
    Maccoun RJ
    Science; 1989 Jun; 244(4908):1046-50. PubMed ID: 17741042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Analysis of timescale to consensus in voting dynamics with more than two options.
    Wu D; Szeto KY
    Phys Rev E; 2018 Apr; 97(4-1):042320. PubMed ID: 29758618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Asking the Right Questions: Examining the Efficacy of Question Trails as a Method of Improving Lay Comprehension and Application of Legal Concepts.
    Spivak B; Ogloff JRP; Clough J
    Psychiatr Psychol Law; 2019; 26(3):441-456. PubMed ID: 31984088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Mock jury trials in Taiwan--paving the ground for introducing lay participation.
    Huang KC; Lin CC
    Law Hum Behav; 2014 Aug; 38(4):367-77. PubMed ID: 24707909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The impact of mock jury gender composition on deliberations and conviction rates in a child sexual assault trial.
    Golding JM; Bradshaw GS; Dunlap EE; Hodell EC
    Child Maltreat; 2007 May; 12(2):182-90. PubMed ID: 17446571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. One angry woman: Anger expression increases influence for men, but decreases influence for women, during group deliberation.
    Salerno JM; Peter-Hagene LC
    Law Hum Behav; 2015 Dec; 39(6):581-92. PubMed ID: 26322952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.