These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

211 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31983986)

  • 41. Juror Decision-Making in a Child Trafficking Case: The Impact of Defendant and Victim Gender, Defendant Age, and Defendant Status.
    Pica E; Hildenbrand A; Fraser L; Pozzulo J
    J Interpers Violence; 2023 Sep; 38(17-18):10031-10054. PubMed ID: 37096978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Improving juror sensitivity to specific eyewitness factors: judicial instructions fail the test.
    Jones AM; Bergold AN; Penrod S
    Psychiatr Psychol Law; 2020; 27(3):366-385. PubMed ID: 33071546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Victim Impact Statements: How Victim Social Class Affects Juror Decision Making.
    Schweitzer K; Nuñez N
    Violence Vict; 2017 Jun; 32(3):521-532. PubMed ID: 28516855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. The effects of body-worn camera footage and eyewitness race on jurors' perceptions of police use of force.
    Saulnier A; Burke KC; Bottoms BL
    Behav Sci Law; 2019 Nov; 37(6):732-750. PubMed ID: 31997421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. When jurors' moral judgments result in jury nullification: moral outrage at the law as a mediator of euthanasia attitudes on verdicts.
    Peter-Hagene LC; Ratliff CL
    Psychiatr Psychol Law; 2021; 28(1):27-49. PubMed ID: 34552378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. The testimony of elderly victim/witnesses and their impact on juror decisions: the importance of examining multiple stereotypes.
    Nunez N; McCoy ML; Clark HL; Shaw LA
    Law Hum Behav; 1999 Aug; 23(4):413-23. PubMed ID: 10439725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Biased interpretation of evidence by mock jurors.
    Carlson KA; Russo JE
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2001 Jun; 7(2):91-103. PubMed ID: 11477983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. The influence of accounts and remorse on mock jurors' judgments of offenders.
    Jehle A; Miller MK; Kemmelmeier M
    Law Hum Behav; 2009 Oct; 33(5):393-404. PubMed ID: 19082696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Juror decision-making in cases of rape involving high functioning Autistic persons.
    Devine K; Mojtahedi D
    Int J Law Psychiatry; 2021; 77():101714. PubMed ID: 34062383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Science in the jury box: jurors' comprehension of mitochondrial DNA evidence.
    Hans VP; Kaye DH; Dann BM; Farley EJ; Albertson S
    Law Hum Behav; 2011 Feb; 35(1):60-71. PubMed ID: 20461543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Secondary confessions: the influence (or lack thereof) of incentive size and scientific expert testimony on jurors' perceptions of informant testimony.
    Maeder EM; Pica E
    Law Hum Behav; 2014 Dec; 38(6):560-8. PubMed ID: 25180762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. The effects of motive information and crime unusualness on jurors' judgments in insanity cases.
    Pickel KL
    Law Hum Behav; 1998 Oct; 22(5):571-84. PubMed ID: 9833567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Expert testimony influences juror decisions in criminal trials involving recovered memories of childhood sexual abuse.
    Khurshid A; Jacquin KM
    J Child Sex Abus; 2013; 22(8):949-67. PubMed ID: 24283545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Who Is the Rotten Apple? Mock Jurors' Views of Teacher-Student Sexual Contact.
    Anderson A; Wingrove T; Fox P; McLean K; Styer E
    J Interpers Violence; 2018 May; 33(9):1449-1471. PubMed ID: 26621035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. The bastard verdict and its influence on jurors.
    Curley LJ; MacLean R; Murray J; Laybourn P; Brown D
    Med Sci Law; 2019 Jan; 59(1):26-35. PubMed ID: 30501474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Jurors' reactions to satanic ritual abuse allegations.
    Bottoms BL; Diviak KR; Davis SL
    Child Abuse Negl; 1997 Sep; 21(9):845-59. PubMed ID: 9298262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Effects of defendant sexual orientation on jurors' perceptions of child sexual assault.
    Wiley TR; Bottoms BL
    Law Hum Behav; 2009 Feb; 33(1):46-60. PubMed ID: 18404363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Verdict spotting: investigating the effects of juror bias, evidence anchors and verdict system in jurors.
    Curley LJ; Murray J; MacLean R; Munro J; Lages M; Frumkin LA; Laybourn P; Brown D
    Psychiatr Psychol Law; 2022; 29(3):323-344. PubMed ID: 35898612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Effects of pretrial publicity on male and female jurors and judges in a mock rape trial.
    Riedel RG
    Psychol Rep; 1993 Dec; 73(3 Pt 1):819-32. PubMed ID: 8302986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. White mock jurors' moral emotional responses to viewing female victim photographs depend on the victim's race.
    Phalen HJ; Salerno JM; Adamoli M; Nadler J
    Law Hum Behav; 2023 Dec; 47(6):666-685. PubMed ID: 38127550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.