These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

154 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31984005)

  • 1. When Hurt Heroes Do Harm: Collective Guilt and Leniency toward War-Veteran Defendants with PTSD.
    Jay ACV; Salerno JM; Ross RC
    Psychiatr Psychol Law; 2018; 25(1):32-58. PubMed ID: 31984005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. "But He's a Star Football Player!": How Social Status Influences Mock Jurors' Perceptions in a Sexual Assault Case.
    Pica E; Sheahan C; Pozzulo J
    J Interpers Violence; 2020 Oct; 35(19-20):3963-3985. PubMed ID: 29294785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Attitudinal Predictors of Juror Decisions on Gender and Sexual Minority Defendants.
    Ringger CS
    J Homosex; 2021 Oct; 68(12):2047-2074. PubMed ID: 32069192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The Role of Defendant Gender and PTSD Diagnosis in a Battered Spouse Case.
    Adair-Russell R; Reed K; Torres MF
    J Interpers Violence; 2024 Jun; ():8862605241257594. PubMed ID: 38907659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. From the shadows into the light: How pretrial publicity and deliberation affect mock jurors' decisions, impressions, and memory.
    Ruva CL; Guenther CC
    Law Hum Behav; 2015 Jun; 39(3):294-310. PubMed ID: 25495716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Eyewitness confidence and mock juror decisions of guilt: A meta-analytic review.
    Slane CR; Dodson CS
    Law Hum Behav; 2022 Feb; 46(1):45-66. PubMed ID: 35073115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The influence of sex on mock jurors' verdicts across type of child abuse cases.
    Pettalia J; Pozzulo JD; Reed J
    Child Abuse Negl; 2017 Jul; 69():1-9. PubMed ID: 28415027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Mock jurors' awareness of age-related changes in memory and cognitive capacity.
    Martschuk N; Sporer SL
    Psychiatr Psychol Law; 2020; 27(3):441-464. PubMed ID: 33071551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The influence of accounts and remorse on mock jurors' judgments of offenders.
    Jehle A; Miller MK; Kemmelmeier M
    Law Hum Behav; 2009 Oct; 33(5):393-404. PubMed ID: 19082696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Keep your bias to yourself: How deliberating with differently biased others affects mock-jurors' guilt decisions, perceptions of the defendant, memories, and evidence interpretation.
    Ruva CL; Guenther CC
    Law Hum Behav; 2017 Oct; 41(5):478-493. PubMed ID: 28714733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. What are we studying? Student jurors, community jurors, and construct validity.
    Keller SR; Wiener RL
    Behav Sci Law; 2011; 29(3):376-94. PubMed ID: 21766327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Defendant remorse, need for affect, and juror sentencing decisions.
    Corwin EP; Cramer RJ; Griffin DA; Brodsky SL
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2012; 40(1):41-9. PubMed ID: 22396340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Mock trial jury decisions as a function of adolescent juror guilt and hostility.
    Ackerman AM; McMahon PM; Fehr LA
    J Genet Psychol; 1984 Jun; 144(2d Half):195-201. PubMed ID: 6736944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Racial bias in jury selection hurts mock jurors, not just defendants: Testing one potential intervention.
    Abramowitz K; Douglass AB
    Law Hum Behav; 2023 Feb; 47(1):153-168. PubMed ID: 36931855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Hysterectomy risk in premenopausal-aged military veterans: associations with sexual assault and gynecologic symptoms.
    Ryan GL; Mengeling MA; Summers KM; Booth BM; Torner JC; Syrop CH; Sadler AG
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Mar; 214(3):352.e1-352.e13. PubMed ID: 26475424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Efficacy of legal judgments for defendants with traumatic brain injury.
    St Pierre ME; Parente R
    NeuroRehabilitation; 2016 Jun; 39(1):125-34. PubMed ID: 27341367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Commentary: Perception of remorse by mock jurors in a capital murder trial.
    Batista LM; Myers W
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2012; 40(1):55-8. PubMed ID: 22396342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Increased Risk of Chronic Multisymptom Illness in Spouses of Gulf War Era Veterans.
    Blanchard M; Toomey R; Karlinsky J; Reda D; Alpern R; Xue L
    Mil Med; 2017 May; 182(5):e1648-e1656. PubMed ID: 29087907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The Defendant with the Prison Tattoo: The Effect of Tattoos on Mock Jurors' Perceptions.
    Brown KA; McKimmie BM; Zarkadi T
    Psychiatr Psychol Law; 2018; 25(3):386-403. PubMed ID: 31984027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. How jurors use and misuse character evidence.
    Hunt JS; Budesheim TL
    J Appl Psychol; 2004 Apr; 89(2):347-61. PubMed ID: 15065980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.