These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

155 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31984019)

  • 1. Research-Based Instructions Induce Sensitivity to Confession Evidence.
    Jones AM; Penrod S
    Psychiatr Psychol Law; 2018; 25(2):257-272. PubMed ID: 31984019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The effect of confession evidence on jurors' verdict decisions: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Mindthoff A; Ferreira PA; Meissner CA
    Law Hum Behav; 2024 Jun; 48(3):163-181. PubMed ID: 38949764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Juror sensitivity to false confession risk factors: Dispositional vs. situational attributions for a confession.
    Woestehoff SA; Meissner CA
    Law Hum Behav; 2016 Oct; 40(5):564-79. PubMed ID: 27227274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Mock jurors' perceptions and case decisions following a juvenile interrogation: Investigating the roles of interested adults and confession type.
    Mindthoff A; Malloy LC; Höhs JM
    Law Hum Behav; 2020 Jun; 44(3):209-222. PubMed ID: 32496092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Can expert testimony sensitize jurors to variations in confession evidence?
    Henderson KS; Levett LM
    Law Hum Behav; 2016 Dec; 40(6):638-649. PubMed ID: 27243361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. How confession characteristics impact juror perceptions of evidence in criminal trials.
    Shifton JJ
    Behav Sci Law; 2019 Jan; 37(1):90-108. PubMed ID: 30706960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Improving juror sensitivity to specific eyewitness factors: judicial instructions fail the test.
    Jones AM; Bergold AN; Penrod S
    Psychiatr Psychol Law; 2020; 27(3):366-385. PubMed ID: 33071546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Waiving goodbye to youth: Jurors perceive transferred juveniles differently from adults but render similar verdicts.
    Katzman J; Fessinger MB; Bornstein BH; McWilliams K
    Behav Sci Law; 2022 Nov; 40(6):835-858. PubMed ID: 36226574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The Psychology of Confessions: A Review of the Literature and Issues.
    Kassin SM; Gudjonsson GH
    Psychol Sci Public Interest; 2004 Nov; 5(2):33-67. PubMed ID: 26158993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The interdependence of perceived confession voluntariness and case evidence.
    Greenspan R; Scurich N
    Law Hum Behav; 2016 Dec; 40(6):650-659. PubMed ID: 27149289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effects of false-evidence ploys and expert testimony on jurors' verdicts, recommended sentences, and perceptions of confession evidence.
    Woody WD; Forrest KD
    Behav Sci Law; 2009; 27(3):333-60. PubMed ID: 19405020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. "I Did It, But Not Like That": Effects of Factually Incorrect Confessions on Juror Judgments.
    Jones EE; Bandy AD; Palmer PG
    Psychiatr Psychol Law; 2019; 26(4):553-570. PubMed ID: 31984096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. False-evidence ploys and interrogations: mock jurors' perceptions of false-evidence ploy type, deception, coercion, and justification.
    Forrest KD; Woody WD; Brady SE; Batterman KC; Stastny BJ; Bruns JA
    Behav Sci Law; 2012; 30(3):342-64. PubMed ID: 22315159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. What do potential jurors know about police interrogation techniques and false confessions?
    Leo RA; Liu B
    Behav Sci Law; 2009; 27(3):381-99. PubMed ID: 19405041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. An explanation for camera perspective bias in voluntariness judgment for video-recorded confession: Suggestion of cognitive frame.
    Park K; Pyo J
    Law Hum Behav; 2012 Jun; 36(3):184-94. PubMed ID: 22667808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Do laypeople recognize youth as a risk factor for false confession? A test of the 'common sense' hypothesis.
    Grove LJ; Kukucka J
    Psychiatr Psychol Law; 2021; 28(2):185-205. PubMed ID: 34712091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Educating Jurors about Forensic Evidence: Using an Expert Witness and Judicial Instructions to Mitigate the Impact of Invalid Forensic Science Testimony.
    Eastwood J; Caldwell J
    J Forensic Sci; 2015 Nov; 60(6):1523-8. PubMed ID: 26234166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Revisiting the False Confession Problem.
    Alvarez-Toro V; Lopez-Morales CA
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2018 Mar; 46(1):34-44. PubMed ID: 29618534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. One Country, Two Cultures: Are Hong Kong Mock Jurors "Mainlandized" by the Predominant Chinese Criminal Justice Concept of Confession?
    Hui CY; Lo TW
    Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol; 2015 Sep; 59(10):1104-24. PubMed ID: 24670371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A national epidemiological study investigating risk factors for police interrogation and false confession among juveniles and young persons.
    Gudjonsson GH; Sigurdsson JF; Sigfusdottir ID; Asgeirsdottir BB; González RA; Young S
    Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol; 2016 Mar; 51(3):359-67. PubMed ID: 26537245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.