These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

155 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31984019)

  • 21. Videotaped interrogations and confessions: a simple change in camera perspective alters verdicts in simulated trials.
    Lassiter GD; Geers AL; Handley IM; Weiland PE; Munhall PJ
    J Appl Psychol; 2002 Oct; 87(5):867-74. PubMed ID: 12395811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Police-suspect interactions and confession rates are affected by suspects' alcohol and drug use status in low-stakes crime interrogations.
    Hagsand AV; Zajac H; Lidell L; Kelly CE; Schreiber Compo N; Evans JR
    Front Psychol; 2022; 13():983362. PubMed ID: 36186325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The effects of judicial admonitions on hearsay evidence.
    Ho Lee D; Krauss DA; Lieberman J
    Int J Law Psychiatry; 2005; 28(6):589-603. PubMed ID: 16125775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Police tactics and guilt status uniquely influence suspects' physiologic reactivity and resistance to confess.
    Normile CJ; Scherr KC
    Law Hum Behav; 2018 Dec; 42(6):497-506. PubMed ID: 30284849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. What Evidence Matters to Jurors? The Prevalence and Importance of Different Homicide Trial Evidence to Mock Jurors.
    Schweitzer K; Nuñez N
    Psychiatr Psychol Law; 2018; 25(3):437-451. PubMed ID: 31984031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Harmless error analysis: How do judges respond to confession errors?
    Wallace DB; Kassin SM
    Law Hum Behav; 2012 Apr; 36(2):151-7. PubMed ID: 22471419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The Effects of Limiting Instructions about Emotional Evidence Depend on Need for Cognition.
    Matsuo K; Itoh Y
    Psychiatr Psychol Law; 2017; 24(4):516-529. PubMed ID: 31983971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Interrogations, confessions, and adolescent offenders' perceptions of the legal system.
    Arndorfer A; Malloy LC; Cauffman E
    Law Hum Behav; 2015 Oct; 39(5):503-13. PubMed ID: 26011040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The effects of accomplice witnesses and jailhouse informants on jury decision making.
    Neuschatz JS; Lawson DS; Swanner JK; Meissner CA; Neuschatz JS
    Law Hum Behav; 2008 Apr; 32(2):137-49. PubMed ID: 17703355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Unmaking a murderer: behaviour sequence analysis of false confessions.
    Keatley DA; Marono A; Clarke DD
    Psychiatr Psychol Law; 2018; 25(3):425-436. PubMed ID: 31984030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. A third verdict option: exploring the impact of the not proven verdict on mock juror decision making.
    Hope L; Greene E; Memon A; Gavisk M; Houston K
    Law Hum Behav; 2008 Jun; 32(3):241-52. PubMed ID: 17703354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Language style matching and police interrogation outcomes.
    Richardson BH; Taylor PJ; Snook B; Conchie SM; Bennell C
    Law Hum Behav; 2014 Aug; 38(4):357-66. PubMed ID: 24730389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Jurors' perceptions of juvenile defendants: the influence of intellectual disability, abuse history, and confession evidence.
    Najdowski CJ; Bottoms BL; Vargas MC
    Behav Sci Law; 2009; 27(3):401-30. PubMed ID: 19391102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. How factors present during the immediate interrogation situation produce short-sighted confession decisions.
    Madon S; Yang Y; Smalarz L; Guyll M; Scherr KC
    Law Hum Behav; 2013 Feb; 37(1):60-74. PubMed ID: 22924468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Will jurors correct for evidence interdependence in their verdicts? It depends.
    Pate M; Kienzle M; Vogler V
    Behav Sci Law; 2019 Jan; 37(1):78-89. PubMed ID: 30266044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Commentary: ethics-related implications and neurobiological correlates of false confessions in juveniles.
    Weinstock R; Thompson C
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2009; 37(3):344-8. PubMed ID: 19767499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Are consistent juror decisions related to fast and frugal decision making? Investigating the relationship between juror consistency, decision speed and cue utilisation.
    Curley LJ; Murray J; MacLean R; Laybourn P
    Med Sci Law; 2017 Oct; 57(4):211-219. PubMed ID: 28992745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The effects of promising to tell the truth, the putative confession, and recall and recognition questions on maltreated and non-maltreated children's disclosure of a minor transgression.
    Quas JA; Stolzenberg SN; Lyon TD
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2018 Feb; 166():266-279. PubMed ID: 28950167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. How downplaying or exaggerating crime severity in a confession affects perceived guilt.
    Holt GA; Palmer MA
    Psychiatr Psychol Law; 2021; 28(4):599-611. PubMed ID: 35558144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Effects of expert testimony and interrogation tactics on perceptions of confessions.
    Moffa MS; Platania J
    Psychol Rep; 2007 Apr; 100(2):563-70. PubMed ID: 17564233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.