These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

151 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31984060)

  • 1. Children as alibi witnesses: the effect of age and confidence on mock-juror decision making.
    Fawcett H; Winstanley K
    Psychiatr Psychol Law; 2018; 25(6):957-971. PubMed ID: 31984060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effects of an alibi witness's relationship to the defendant on mock jurors' judgments.
    Hosch HM; Culhane SE; Jolly KW; Chavez RM; Shaw LH
    Law Hum Behav; 2011 Apr; 35(2):127-42. PubMed ID: 20411316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Assessing alibi believability: the alibi story, presence of physical evidence and timing of disclosure.
    Allison M; Hawes A
    Psychiatr Psychol Law; 2023; 30(2):211-223. PubMed ID: 36950193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Altruistic Lying in an Alibi Corroboration Context: The Effects of Liking, Compliance, and Relationship between Suspects and Witnesses.
    Marion SB; Burke TM
    Behav Sci Law; 2017 Jan; 35(1):37-59. PubMed ID: 28008653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The impact of developmental language disorder in a defendant's description on mock jurors' perceptions and judgements.
    Hobson HM; Woodley J; Gamblen S; Brackely J; O'Neill F; Miles D; Westwood C
    Int J Lang Commun Disord; 2023 Jan; 58(1):189-205. PubMed ID: 36087284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Mock jurors' awareness of age-related changes in memory and cognitive capacity.
    Martschuk N; Sporer SL
    Psychiatr Psychol Law; 2020; 27(3):441-464. PubMed ID: 33071551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Saving damsels, sentencing deviants and selective chivalry decisions: juror decision-making in an ambiguous assault case.
    Meaux LT; Cox J; Kopkin MR
    Psychiatr Psychol Law; 2018; 25(5):724-736. PubMed ID: 31984048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The influence of sex on mock jurors' verdicts across type of child abuse cases.
    Pettalia J; Pozzulo JD; Reed J
    Child Abuse Negl; 2017 Jul; 69():1-9. PubMed ID: 28415027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Alibi believability: Corroborative evidence and contextual factors.
    Allison M; Jung S; Benjamin AC
    Behav Sci Law; 2020 Jul; 38(4):337-354. PubMed ID: 32639036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Perceptions of bias and credibility of male and female clinical psychologist and psychiatrist expert witnesses presenting clinical information in the courtroom.
    Kipoulas E; Edwards I; Radakovic R; Beazley PI
    Int J Law Psychiatry; 2024; 96():102016. PubMed ID: 39213688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Talking about a black man: the influence of defendant and character witness race on jurors' use of character evidence.
    Maeder EM; Hunt JS
    Behav Sci Law; 2011; 29(4):608-20. PubMed ID: 21796674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Abuse Is Abuse: The Influence of Type of Abuse, Victim Age, and Defendant Age on Juror Decision Making.
    Sheahan CL; Pica E; Pozzulo JD
    J Interpers Violence; 2021 Jan; 36(1-2):938-956. PubMed ID: 29294918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Juror sensitivity to the cross-race effect.
    Abshire J; Bornstein BH
    Law Hum Behav; 2003 Oct; 27(5):471-80. PubMed ID: 14593793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Negative and positive pretrial publicity affect juror memory and decision making.
    Ruva CL; McEvoy C
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2008 Sep; 14(3):226-35. PubMed ID: 18808276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. How type of excuse defense, mock juror age, and defendant age affect mock jurors' decisions.
    Higgins PL; Heath WP; Grannemann BD
    J Soc Psychol; 2007 Aug; 147(4):371-92. PubMed ID: 17955749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. An attribution theory-based content analysis of mock jurors' deliberations regarding coerced confessions.
    Stevenson MC; McCracken E; Watson A; Petty T; Plogher T
    Law Hum Behav; 2023 Apr; 47(2):348-366. PubMed ID: 37053386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Mock jurors' evaluation of firearm examiner testimony.
    Garrett BL; Scurich N; Crozier WE
    Law Hum Behav; 2020 Oct; 44(5):412-423. PubMed ID: 33090867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effects of testimonial inconsistencies and eyewitness confidence on mock-juror judgments.
    Brewer N; Burke A
    Law Hum Behav; 2002 Jun; 26(3):353-64. PubMed ID: 12061623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Mock-Jurors' Judgements in a Sexual Assault Case: The Influence of Defendant Race and Occupational Status, Delayed Reporting, and Multiple Allegations.
    Fraser BM; Pica E; Pozzulo JD
    J Interpers Violence; 2023 Jul; 38(13-14):7964-7989. PubMed ID: 36762531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Mock Juror Perceptions of Credibility and Culpability in an Autistic Defendant.
    Maras K; Marshall I; Sands C
    J Autism Dev Disord; 2019 Mar; 49(3):996-1010. PubMed ID: 30382444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.