These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

155 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31984097)

  • 21. A stability bias effect among deceivers.
    Harvey AC; Vrij A; Hope L; Leal S; Mann S
    Law Hum Behav; 2017 Dec; 41(6):519-529. PubMed ID: 28726439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Insurance based lie detection: Enhancing the verifiability approach with a model statement component.
    Harvey AC; Vrij A; Leal S; Lafferty M; Nahari G
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2017 Mar; 174():1-8. PubMed ID: 28088655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Cues to deception: can complications, common knowledge details, and self-handicapping strategies discriminate between truths, embedded lies and outright lies in an Italian-speaking sample?
    Caso L; Cavagnis L; Vrij A; Palena N
    Front Psychol; 2023; 14():1128194. PubMed ID: 37179853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Only true and fabricated baseline statements combined might improve lie, but not truth, detection.
    Schemmel J; Leve M; Maier BG; Ziegler M; Volbert R
    Law Hum Behav; 2022 Oct; 46(5):372-384. PubMed ID: 36107688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Learning to Detect Deception from Evasive Answers and Inconsistencies across Repeated Interviews: A Study with Lay Respondents and Police Officers.
    Masip J; Martínez C; Blandón-Gitlin I; Sánchez N; Herrero C; Ibabe I
    Front Psychol; 2017; 8():2207. PubMed ID: 29354078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Amplifying deceivers' flawed metacognition: Encouraging disclosures after delays with a model statement.
    Harvey AC; Vrij A; Leal S; Hope L; Mann S
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2019 Sep; 200():102935. PubMed ID: 31715443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Will the truth come out? the effect of deception, age, status, coaching, and social skills on CBCA scores.
    Vrij A; Akehurst L; Soukara S; Bull R
    Law Hum Behav; 2002 Jun; 26(3):261-83. PubMed ID: 12061619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Some Evidence That Truth-Tellers Are More Attractive Than Liars.
    Ten Brinke L; Raymundo I; Mukherjee M; Carney DR
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2023 Oct; ():1461672231207567. PubMed ID: 37888143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. You want to know the truth? Then don't mimic!
    Stel M; van Dijk E; Olivier E
    Psychol Sci; 2009 Jun; 20(6):693-9. PubMed ID: 19422628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Strategic use of evidence during police interviews: when training to detect deception works.
    Hartwig M; Granhag PA; Strömwall LA; Kronkvist O
    Law Hum Behav; 2006 Oct; 30(5):603-19. PubMed ID: 16977348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Unraveling the Misconception About Deception and Nervous Behavior.
    Vrij A; Fisher RP
    Front Psychol; 2020; 11():1377. PubMed ID: 32625154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Thermal imaging as a lie detection tool at airports.
    Warmelink L; Vrij A; Mann S; Leal S; Forrester D; Fisher RP
    Law Hum Behav; 2011 Feb; 35(1):40-8. PubMed ID: 21061052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Heuristic versus systematic processing of information in detecting deception: questioning the truth bias.
    Masip J; Garrido E; Herrero C
    Psychol Rep; 2009 Aug; 105(1):11-36. PubMed ID: 19810430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Promises and lies: can observers detect deception in written messages.
    Chen J; Houser D
    Exp Econ; 2017; 20(2):396-419. PubMed ID: 28553157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Markers of good planning behavior as a cue for separating true and false intent.
    Mac Giolla E; Granhag PA; Liu-Jönsson M
    Psych J; 2013 Dec; 2(3):183-9. PubMed ID: 26271363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Catching a Deceiver in the Act: Processes Underlying Deception in an Interactive Interview Setting.
    Ströfer S; Ufkes EG; Noordzij ML; Giebels E
    Appl Psychophysiol Biofeedback; 2016 Sep; 41(3):349-62. PubMed ID: 27193132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. "Intuitive" lie detection of children's deception by law enforcement officials and university students.
    Leach AM; Talwar V; Lee K; Bala N; Lindsay RC
    Law Hum Behav; 2004 Dec; 28(6):661-85. PubMed ID: 15732652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Eliciting cues to false intent: a new application of strategic interviewing.
    Clemens F; Granhag PA; Strömwall LA
    Law Hum Behav; 2011 Dec; 35(6):512-22. PubMed ID: 21170575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Using the model statement to elicit information and cues to deceit in interpreter-based interviews.
    Vrij A; Leal S; Mann S; Dalton G; Jo E; Shaboltas A; Khaleeva M; Granskaya J; Houston K
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2017 Jun; 177():44-53. PubMed ID: 28477454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Detecting false intentions using unanticipated questions.
    Bogaard G; van der Mark J; Meijer EH
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(12):e0226257. PubMed ID: 31825997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.