293 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31984131)
1. Benchmarking of long-read assemblers for prokaryote whole genome sequencing.
Wick RR; Holt KE
F1000Res; 2019; 8():2138. PubMed ID: 31984131
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Benchmarking Long-Read Assemblers for Genomic Analyses of Bacterial Pathogens Using Oxford Nanopore Sequencing.
Chen Z; Erickson DL; Meng J
Int J Mol Sci; 2020 Dec; 21(23):. PubMed ID: 33271875
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Evaluating long-read de novo assembly tools for eukaryotic genomes: insights and considerations.
Cosma BM; Shirali Hossein Zade R; Jordan EN; van Lent P; Peng C; Pillay S; Abeel T
Gigascience; 2022 Dec; 12():. PubMed ID: 38000912
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparative Evaluation of Genome Assemblers from Long-Read Sequencing for Plants and Crops.
Jung H; Jeon MS; Hodgett M; Waterhouse P; Eyun SI
J Agric Food Chem; 2020 Jul; 68(29):7670-7677. PubMed ID: 32530283
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A practical assembly guideline for genomes with various levels of heterozygosity.
Mochizuki T; Sakamoto M; Tanizawa Y; Nakayama T; Tanifuji G; Kamikawa R; Nakamura Y
Brief Bioinform; 2023 Sep; 24(6):. PubMed ID: 37798248
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Long read genome assemblers struggle with small plasmids.
Johnson J; Soehnlen M; Blankenship HM
Microb Genom; 2023 May; 9(5):. PubMed ID: 37224062
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Advancing metagenome-assembled genome-based pathogen identification: unraveling the power of long-read assembly algorithms in Oxford Nanopore sequencing.
Chen Z; Grim CJ; Ramachandran P; Meng J
Microbiol Spectr; 2024 Jun; 12(6):e0011724. PubMed ID: 38687063
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Polishing the Oxford Nanopore long-read assemblies of bacterial pathogens with Illumina short reads to improve genomic analyses.
Chen Z; Erickson DL; Meng J
Genomics; 2021 May; 113(3):1366-1377. PubMed ID: 33716184
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Overcoming uncollapsed haplotypes in long-read assemblies of non-model organisms.
Guiglielmoni N; Houtain A; Derzelle A; Van Doninck K; Flot JF
BMC Bioinformatics; 2021 Jun; 22(1):303. PubMed ID: 34090340
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Testing assembly strategies of Francisella tularensis genomes to infer an evolutionary conservation analysis of genomic structures.
Neubert K; Zuchantke E; Leidenfrost RM; Wünschiers R; Grützke J; Malorny B; Brendebach H; Al Dahouk S; Homeier T; Hotzel H; Reinert K; Tomaso H; Busch A
BMC Genomics; 2021 Nov; 22(1):822. PubMed ID: 34773979
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The impact of applying various de novo assembly and correction tools on the identification of genome characterization, drug resistance, and virulence factors of clinical isolates using ONT sequencing.
Safar HA; Alatar F; Nasser K; Al-Ajmi R; Alfouzan W; Mustafa AS
BMC Biotechnol; 2023 Jul; 23(1):26. PubMed ID: 37525145
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Accuracy and Completeness of Long Read Metagenomic Assemblies.
Buttler J; Drown DM
Microorganisms; 2022 Dec; 11(1):. PubMed ID: 36677391
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Benchmarking of long-read sequencing, assemblers and polishers for yeast genome.
Zhang X; Liu CG; Yang SH; Wang X; Bai FW; Wang Z
Brief Bioinform; 2022 May; 23(3):. PubMed ID: 35511110
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Benchmarking of de novo assembly algorithms for Nanopore data reveals optimal performance of OLC approaches.
Cherukuri Y; Janga SC
BMC Genomics; 2016 Aug; 17 Suppl 7(Suppl 7):507. PubMed ID: 27556636
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Benchmarking genome assembly methods on metagenomic sequencing data.
Zhang Z; Yang C; Veldsman WP; Fang X; Zhang L
Brief Bioinform; 2023 Mar; 24(2):. PubMed ID: 36917471
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Benchmarking Oxford Nanopore read assemblers for high-quality molluscan genomes.
Sun J; Li R; Chen C; Sigwart JD; Kocot KM
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci; 2021 May; 376(1825):20200160. PubMed ID: 33813888
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of long-read sequencing technologies in the hybrid assembly of complex bacterial genomes.
De Maio N; Shaw LP; Hubbard A; George S; Sanderson ND; Swann J; Wick R; AbuOun M; Stubberfield E; Hoosdally SJ; Crook DW; Peto TEA; Sheppard AE; Bailey MJ; Read DS; Anjum MF; Walker AS; Stoesser N; On Behalf Of The Rehab Consortium
Microb Genom; 2019 Sep; 5(9):. PubMed ID: 31483244
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Are we there yet? Benchmarking low-coverage nanopore long-read sequencing for the assembling of mitochondrial genomes using the vulnerable silky shark Carcharhinus falciformis.
Baeza JA; García-De León FJ
BMC Genomics; 2022 Apr; 23(1):320. PubMed ID: 35459089
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of long-read methods for sequencing and assembly of a plant genome.
Murigneux V; Rai SK; Furtado A; Bruxner TJC; Tian W; Harliwong I; Wei H; Yang B; Ye Q; Anderson E; Mao Q; Drmanac R; Wang O; Peters BA; Xu M; Wu P; Topp B; Coin LJM; Henry RJ
Gigascience; 2020 Dec; 9(12):. PubMed ID: 33347571
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Benchmarking multi-platform sequencing technologies for human genome assembly.
Wang J; Veldsman WP; Fang X; Huang Y; Xie X; Lyu A; Zhang L
Brief Bioinform; 2023 Sep; 24(5):. PubMed ID: 37594299
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
