284 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31984131)
61. Canu: scalable and accurate long-read assembly via adaptive
Koren S; Walenz BP; Berlin K; Miller JR; Bergman NH; Phillippy AM
Genome Res; 2017 May; 27(5):722-736. PubMed ID: 28298431
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
62. Comparison of long-read sequencing technologies in interrogating bacteria and fly genomes.
Tvedte ES; Gasser M; Sparklin BC; Michalski J; Hjelmen CE; Johnston JS; Zhao X; Bromley R; Tallon LJ; Sadzewicz L; Rasko DA; Dunning Hotopp JC
G3 (Bethesda); 2021 Jun; 11(6):. PubMed ID: 33768248
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
63. A systematic comparison of human mitochondrial genome assembly tools.
Mahar NS; Satyam R; Sundar D; Gupta I
BMC Bioinformatics; 2023 Sep; 24(1):341. PubMed ID: 37704952
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
64. A critical comparison of technologies for a plant genome sequencing project.
Paajanen P; Kettleborough G; López-Girona E; Giolai M; Heavens D; Baker D; Lister A; Cugliandolo F; Wilde G; Hein I; Macaulay I; Bryan GJ; Clark MD
Gigascience; 2019 Mar; 8(3):. PubMed ID: 30624602
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
65. Evaluating Illumina-, Nanopore-, and PacBio-based genome assembly strategies with the bald notothen, Trematomus borchgrevinki.
Rayamajhi N; Cheng CC; Catchen JM
G3 (Bethesda); 2022 Nov; 12(11):. PubMed ID: 35904764
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
66. Linear time complexity de novo long read genome assembly with GoldRush.
Wong J; Coombe L; Nikolić V; Zhang E; Nip KM; Sidhu P; Warren RL; Birol I
Nat Commun; 2023 May; 14(1):2906. PubMed ID: 37217507
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
67. Evaluation of real-time nanopore sequencing for Salmonella serotype prediction.
Xu F; Ge C; Luo H; Li S; Wiedmann M; Deng X; Zhang G; Stevenson A; Baker RC; Tang S
Food Microbiol; 2020 Aug; 89():103452. PubMed ID: 32138998
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
68. Evaluation of nine popular de novo assemblers in microbial genome assembly.
Forouzan E; Maleki MSM; Karkhane AA; Yakhchali B
J Microbiol Methods; 2017 Dec; 143():32-37. PubMed ID: 28939423
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
69. Recovery of small plasmid sequences via Oxford Nanopore sequencing.
Wick RR; Judd LM; Wyres KL; Holt KE
Microb Genom; 2021 Aug; 7(8):. PubMed ID: 34431763
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
70. The complex task of choosing a de novo assembly: lessons from fungal genomes.
Gallo JE; Muñoz JF; Misas E; McEwen JG; Clay OK
Comput Biol Chem; 2014 Dec; 53 Pt A():97-107. PubMed ID: 25262360
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
71. Evaluation and Validation of Assembling Corrected PacBio Long Reads for Microbial Genome Completion via Hybrid Approaches.
Lin HH; Liao YC
PLoS One; 2015; 10(12):e0144305. PubMed ID: 26641475
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
72. NanoGalaxy: Nanopore long-read sequencing data analysis in Galaxy.
de Koning W; Miladi M; Hiltemann S; Heikema A; Hays JP; Flemming S; van den Beek M; Mustafa DA; Backofen R; Grüning B; Stubbs AP
Gigascience; 2020 Oct; 9(10):. PubMed ID: 33068114
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
73. The use of Oxford Nanopore native barcoding for complete genome assembly.
Bayliss SC; Hunt VL; Yokoyama M; Thorpe HA; Feil EJ
Gigascience; 2017 Mar; 6(3):1-6. PubMed ID: 28327913
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
74. Nanopore sequencing technology and tools for genome assembly: computational analysis of the current state, bottlenecks and future directions.
Senol Cali D; Kim JS; Ghose S; Alkan C; Mutlu O
Brief Bioinform; 2019 Jul; 20(4):1542-1559. PubMed ID: 29617724
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
75. Long Reads Are Revolutionizing 20 Years of Insect Genome Sequencing.
Hotaling S; Sproul JS; Heckenhauer J; Powell A; Larracuente AM; Pauls SU; Kelley JL; Frandsen PB
Genome Biol Evol; 2021 Aug; 13(8):. PubMed ID: 34152413
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
76. Critical evaluation of short, long, and hybrid assembly for contextual analysis of antibiotic resistance genes in complex environmental metagenomes.
Brown CL; Keenum IM; Dai D; Zhang L; Vikesland PJ; Pruden A
Sci Rep; 2021 Feb; 11(1):3753. PubMed ID: 33580146
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
77. High quality 3C de novo assembly and annotation of a multidrug resistant ST-111 Pseudomonas aeruginosa genome: Benchmark of hybrid and non-hybrid assemblers.
Molina-Mora JA; Campos-Sánchez R; Rodríguez C; Shi L; García F
Sci Rep; 2020 Jan; 10(1):1392. PubMed ID: 31996747
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
78. Complex genome assembly based on long-read sequencing.
Zhang T; Zhou J; Gao W; Jia Y; Wei Y; Wang G
Brief Bioinform; 2022 Sep; 23(5):. PubMed ID: 35940845
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
79. Draft genome assemblies using sequencing reads from Oxford Nanopore Technology and Illumina platforms for four species of North American Fundulus killifish.
Johnson LK; Sahasrabudhe R; Gill JA; Roach JL; Froenicke L; Brown CT; Whitehead A
Gigascience; 2020 Jun; 9(6):. PubMed ID: 32556169
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
80. A Bos taurus sequencing methods benchmark for assembly, haplotyping, and variant calling.
Eché C; Iampietro C; Birbes C; Dréau A; Kuchly C; Di Franco A; Klopp C; Faraut T; Djebali S; Castinel A; Zytnicki M; Denis E; Boussaha M; Grohs C; Boichard D; Gaspin C; Milan D; Donnadieu C
Sci Data; 2023 Jun; 10(1):369. PubMed ID: 37291142
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
