These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

146 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31985800)

  • 1. Estimating Phylogenies from Shape and Similar Multidimensional Data: Why It Is Not Reliable.
    Varón-González C; Whelan S; Klingenberg CP
    Syst Biol; 2020 Sep; 69(5):863-883. PubMed ID: 31985800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Phylogenetic analysis and intraspecific variation: performance of parsimony, likelihood, and distance methods.
    Wiens JJ; Servedio MR
    Syst Biol; 1998 Jun; 47(2):228-53. PubMed ID: 12064228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Morphological Phylogenetics Evaluated Using Novel Evolutionary Simulations.
    Keating JN; Sansom RS; Sutton MD; Knight CG; Garwood RJ
    Syst Biol; 2020 Sep; 69(5):897-912. PubMed ID: 32073641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Towards building the tree of life: a simulation study for all angiosperm genera.
    Salamin N; Hodkinson TR; Savolainen Coates V
    Syst Biol; 2005 Apr; 54(2):183-96. PubMed ID: 16012091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evaluating the relationship between evolutionary divergence and phylogenetic accuracy in AFLP data sets.
    García-Pereira MJ; Caballero A; Quesada H
    Mol Biol Evol; 2010 May; 27(5):988-1000. PubMed ID: 20026482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Utility of characters evolving at diverse rates of evolution to resolve quartet trees with unequal branch lengths: analytical predictions of long-branch effects.
    Su Z; Townsend JP
    BMC Evol Biol; 2015 May; 15():86. PubMed ID: 25968460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A simulation comparison of phylogeny algorithms under equal and unequal evolutionary rates.
    Kuhner MK; Felsenstein J
    Mol Biol Evol; 1994 May; 11(3):459-68. PubMed ID: 8015439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Quantifying and comparing phylogenetic evolutionary rates for shape and other high-dimensional phenotypic data.
    Adams DC
    Syst Biol; 2014 Mar; 63(2):166-77. PubMed ID: 24335426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The effects of sequence length, tree topology, and number of taxa on the performance of phylogenetic methods.
    Charleston MA; Hendy MD; Penny D
    J Comput Biol; 1994; 1(2):133-51. PubMed ID: 8790460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Estimating speciation and extinction rates for phylogenies of higher taxa.
    Stadler T; Bokma F
    Syst Biol; 2013 Mar; 62(2):220-30. PubMed ID: 23103589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. ACCURACY OF ESTIMATED PHYLOGENIES: EFFECTS OF TREE TOPOLOGY AND EVOLUTIONARY MODEL.
    Rohlf FJ; Chang WS; Sokal RR; Kim J
    Evolution; 1990 Sep; 44(6):1671-1684. PubMed ID: 28564306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Euclidean nature of phylogenetic distance matrices.
    de Vienne DM; Aguileta G; Ollier S
    Syst Biol; 2011 Dec; 60(6):826-32. PubMed ID: 21804094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. EVALUATION OF THE RESTRICTED MAXIMUM-LIKELIHOOD METHOD FOR ESTIMATING PHYLOGENETIC TREES USING SIMULATED ALLELE-FREQUENCY DATA.
    Rohlf FJ; Wooten MC
    Evolution; 1988 May; 42(3):581-595. PubMed ID: 28564007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A generalized K statistic for estimating phylogenetic signal from shape and other high-dimensional multivariate data.
    Adams DC
    Syst Biol; 2014 Sep; 63(5):685-97. PubMed ID: 24789073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A fast likelihood approach for estimation of large phylogenies from continuous trait data.
    Peng J; Rajeevan H; Kubatko L; RoyChoudhury A
    Mol Phylogenet Evol; 2021 Aug; 161():107142. PubMed ID: 33713799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Bayesian placement of fossils on phylogenies using quantitative morphometric data.
    Parins-Fukuchi C
    Evolution; 2018 Sep; 72(9):1801-1814. PubMed ID: 29998561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Relative efficiencies of the maximum-likelihood, neighbor-joining, and maximum-parsimony methods when substitution rate varies with site.
    Tateno Y; Takezaki N; Nei M
    Mol Biol Evol; 1994 Mar; 11(2):261-77. PubMed ID: 8170367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Detecting the node-density artifact in phylogeny reconstruction.
    Venditti C; Meade A; Pagel M
    Syst Biol; 2006 Aug; 55(4):637-43. PubMed ID: 16969939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. More on the Best Evolutionary Rate for Phylogenetic Analysis.
    Klopfstein S; Massingham T; Goldman N
    Syst Biol; 2017 Sep; 66(5):769-785. PubMed ID: 28595363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Testing and quantifying phylogenetic signals and homoplasy in morphometric data.
    Klingenberg CP; Gidaszewski NA
    Syst Biol; 2010 May; 59(3):245-61. PubMed ID: 20525633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.