These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

130 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31985815)

  • 21. Teaching of the repair of defective composite restorations in Scandinavian dental schools.
    Blum IR; Lynch CD; Wilson NH
    J Oral Rehabil; 2012 Mar; 39(3):210-6. PubMed ID: 21972940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Defective dental restorations: to repair or not to repair? Part 2: All-ceramics and porcelain fused to metal systems.
    Blum IR; Jagger DC; Wilson NH
    Dent Update; 2011 Apr; 38(3):150-2, 154-6, 158. PubMed ID: 21667828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Repair or replacement of amalgam restorations: decisions at a USA and a UK dental school.
    Setcos JC; Khosravi R; Wilson NH; Shen C; Yang M; Mjör IA
    Oper Dent; 2004; 29(4):392-7. PubMed ID: 15279477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Clinical decision-making in anterior resin composite restorations: a multicenter evaluation.
    de Freitas BN; Pintado-Palomino K; de Almeida CVVB; Cruvinel PB; Souza-Gabriel AE; Corona SAM; Geraldeli S; Grosgogeat B; Roulet JF; Tirapelli C
    J Dent; 2021 Oct; 113():103757. PubMed ID: 34333053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Understanding the management and teaching of dental restoration repair: Systematic review and meta-analysis of surveys.
    Kanzow P; Wiegand A; Göstemeyer G; Schwendicke F
    J Dent; 2018 Feb; 69():1-21. PubMed ID: 28943362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Restorative material and other tooth-specific variables associated with the decision to repair or replace defective restorations: findings from The Dental PBRN.
    Gordan VV; Riley JL; Worley DC; Gilbert GH;
    J Dent; 2012 May; 40(5):397-405. PubMed ID: 22342563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Repair of defective composite restorations. A questionnaire study among dentists in the Public Dental Service in Norway.
    Staxrud F; Tveit AB; Rukke HV; Kopperud SE
    J Dent; 2016 Sep; 52():50-4. PubMed ID: 27421988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Clinical Practice Guidelines for Recall and Maintenance of Patients with Tooth-Borne and Implant-Borne Dental Restorations.
    Bidra AS; Daubert DM; Garcia LT; Kosinski TF; Nenn CA; Olsen JA; Platt JA; Wingrove SS; Chandler ND; Curtis DA
    J Dent Hyg; 2016 Feb; 90(1):60-9. PubMed ID: 26896518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Repair versus replacement of defective direct restorations: A cross-sectional study among US dentists.
    Kattan W; Urquhart O; Comnick C; McQuistan MR; Guzmán-Armstrong S; Kolker J; Teixeira EC
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2021 Nov; 152(11):927-935. PubMed ID: 34489065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Repair or Replacement of Restorations: A Prospective cohort study by dentists in The National Dental Practice-Based Research Network.
    Gordan VV; Riley JL; Rindal DB; Qvist V; Fellows JL; Dilbone DA; Brotman SG; Gilbert GH;
    Tex Dent J; 2017 Jan; 134(1):20-32. PubMed ID: 30549672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Repair vs replacement of failed restorations in general dental practice: factors influencing treatment choices and outcomes.
    Javidi H; Tickle M; Aggarwal VR
    Br Dent J; 2015 Jan; 218(1):E2. PubMed ID: 25571840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The survival of Class V restorations in general dental practice. Part 2, early failure.
    Stewardson DA; Thornley P; Bigg T; Bromage C; Browne A; Cottam D; Dalby D; Gilmour J; Horton J; Roberts E; Westoby L; Creanor S; Burke T
    Br Dent J; 2011 Jun; 210(11):E19. PubMed ID: 21659987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. One-year retrospective clinical evaluation of hybrid composite restorations placed in United Kingdom general practices.
    Burke FJ; Crisp RJ; Bell TJ; Healy A; Mark B; McBirnie R; Osborne-Smith KL
    Quintessence Int; 2001 Apr; 32(4):293-8. PubMed ID: 12066649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Replacement versus repair of defective restorations in adults: amalgam.
    Sharif MO; Merry A; Catleugh M; Tickle M; Brunton P; Dunne SM; Aggarwal VR
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2010 Feb; (2):CD005970. PubMed ID: 20166077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Selected and simplified FDI criteria for assessment of restorations.
    Maillet C; Decup F; Dantony E; Iwaz J; Chevalier C; Gueyffier F; Maucort-Boulch D; Grosgogeat B; Le Clerc J
    J Dent; 2022 Jul; 122():104109. PubMed ID: 35346772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Repair Versus Replacement of Restorations.
    Larson TD
    Northwest Dent; 2016 Sep; 95(4):35-9. PubMed ID: 30549767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Influence of the method of funding on the age of failed restorations in general dental practice in the UK.
    Burke FJ; Wilson NH; Cheung SW; Mjör IA
    Br Dent J; 2002 Jun; 192(12):699-702. PubMed ID: 12125795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Cost-effectiveness of repairing versus replacing composite or amalgam restorations.
    Kanzow P; Wiegand A; Schwendicke F
    J Dent; 2016 Nov; 54():41-47. PubMed ID: 27575986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Summary of: repair vs replacement of failed restorations in general dental practice: factors influencing treatment choices and outcomes.
    Blum IR
    Br Dent J; 2015 Jan; 218(1):22-3. PubMed ID: 25571820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Longevity of Anterior Composite Restorations in a General Dental Practice-Based Network.
    Collares K; Opdam NJM; Laske M; Bronkhorst EM; Demarco FF; Correa MB; Huysmans MCDNJM
    J Dent Res; 2017 Sep; 96(10):1092-1099. PubMed ID: 28665777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.