These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

226 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31986042)

  • 1. A Mountaineering Strategy to Excited States: Highly Accurate Energies and Benchmarks for Medium Sized Molecules.
    Loos PF; Lipparini F; Boggio-Pasqua M; Scemama A; Jacquemin D
    J Chem Theory Comput; 2020 Mar; 16(3):1711-1741. PubMed ID: 31986042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A Mountaineering Strategy to Excited States: Highly Accurate Reference Energies and Benchmarks.
    Loos PF; Scemama A; Blondel A; Garniron Y; Caffarel M; Jacquemin D
    J Chem Theory Comput; 2018 Aug; 14(8):4360-4379. PubMed ID: 29966098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Reference Energies for Double Excitations.
    Loos PF; Boggio-Pasqua M; Scemama A; Caffarel M; Jacquemin D
    J Chem Theory Comput; 2019 Mar; 15(3):1939-1956. PubMed ID: 30689951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Mountaineering Strategy to Excited States: Highly Accurate Energies and Benchmarks for Exotic Molecules and Radicals.
    Loos PF; Scemama A; Boggio-Pasqua M; Jacquemin D
    J Chem Theory Comput; 2020 Jun; 16(6):3720-3736. PubMed ID: 32379442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A Mountaineering Strategy to Excited States: Highly Accurate Energies and Benchmarks for Bicyclic Systems.
    Loos PF; Jacquemin D
    J Phys Chem A; 2021 Dec; 125(47):10174-10188. PubMed ID: 34792354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Benchmarking Coupled Cluster Methods on Valence Singlet Excited States.
    Kánnár D; Szalay PG
    J Chem Theory Comput; 2014 Sep; 10(9):3757-65. PubMed ID: 26588520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Assessing the Performances of CASPT2 and NEVPT2 for Vertical Excitation Energies.
    Sarkar R; Loos PF; Boggio-Pasqua M; Jacquemin D
    J Chem Theory Comput; 2022 Apr; 18(4):2418-2436. PubMed ID: 35333060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Reference Energies for Intramolecular Charge-Transfer Excitations.
    Loos PF; Comin M; Blase X; Jacquemin D
    J Chem Theory Comput; 2021 Jun; 17(6):3666-3686. PubMed ID: 33955742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Accuracy of Coupled Cluster Excitation Energies in Diffuse Basis Sets.
    Kánnár D; Tajti A; Szalay PG
    J Chem Theory Comput; 2017 Jan; 13(1):202-209. PubMed ID: 27959525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Benchmarks for electronically excited states: CASPT2, CC2, CCSD, and CC3.
    Schreiber M; Silva-Junior MR; Sauer SP; Thiel W
    J Chem Phys; 2008 Apr; 128(13):134110. PubMed ID: 18397056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Accurate full configuration interaction correlation energy estimates for five- and six-membered rings.
    Damour Y; Véril M; Kossoski F; Caffarel M; Jacquemin D; Scemama A; Loos PF
    J Chem Phys; 2021 Oct; 155(13):134104. PubMed ID: 34624964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Benchmarks for Electronically Excited States: A Comparison of Noniterative and Iterative Triples Corrections in Linear Response Coupled Cluster Methods: CCSDR(3) versus CC3.
    Sauer SP; Schreiber M; Silva-Junior MR; Thiel W
    J Chem Theory Comput; 2009 Mar; 5(3):555-64. PubMed ID: 26610222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Assessment of n-Electron Valence State Perturbation Theory for Vertical Excitation Energies.
    Schapiro I; Sivalingam K; Neese F
    J Chem Theory Comput; 2013 Aug; 9(8):3567-80. PubMed ID: 26584112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Cross-Comparisons between Experiment, TD-DFT, CC, and ADC for Transition Energies.
    Suellen C; Freitas RG; Loos PF; Jacquemin D
    J Chem Theory Comput; 2019 Aug; 15(8):4581-4590. PubMed ID: 31265781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Reference Energies for Cyclobutadiene: Automerization and Excited States.
    Monino E; Boggio-Pasqua M; Scemama A; Jacquemin D; Loos PF
    J Phys Chem A; 2022 Jul; 126(28):4664-4679. PubMed ID: 35820169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Is ADC(3) as Accurate as CC3 for Valence and Rydberg Transition Energies?
    Loos PF; Jacquemin D
    J Phys Chem Lett; 2020 Feb; 11(3):974-980. PubMed ID: 31913639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Benchmarks of electronically excited states: basis set effects on CASPT2 results.
    Silva-Junior MR; Schreiber M; Sauer SP; Thiel W
    J Chem Phys; 2010 Nov; 133(17):174318. PubMed ID: 21054043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Benchmarking Correlated Methods for Frequency-Dependent Polarizabilities: Aromatic Molecules with the CC3, CCSD, CC2, SOPPA, SOPPA(CC2), and SOPPA(CCSD) Methods.
    Jørgensen MW; Faber R; Ligabue A; Sauer SPA
    J Chem Theory Comput; 2020 May; 16(5):3006-3018. PubMed ID: 32302474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The third-order algebraic diagrammatic construction method (ADC(3)) for the polarization propagator for closed-shell molecules: efficient implementation and benchmarking.
    Harbach PH; Wormit M; Dreuw A
    J Chem Phys; 2014 Aug; 141(6):064113. PubMed ID: 25134557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Benchmarking TD-DFT and Wave Function Methods for Oscillator Strengths and Excited-State Dipole Moments.
    Sarkar R; Boggio-Pasqua M; Loos PF; Jacquemin D
    J Chem Theory Comput; 2021 Feb; 17(2):1117-1132. PubMed ID: 33492950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.