These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

133 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31986054)

  • 21. How do drivers avoid collisions? A driving simulator-based study.
    Li X; Rakotonirainy A; Yan X
    J Safety Res; 2019 Sep; 70():89-96. PubMed ID: 31848013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. How to warn drivers in various safety-critical situations - Different strategies, different reactions.
    Winkler S; Kazazi J; Vollrath M
    Accid Anal Prev; 2018 Aug; 117():410-426. PubMed ID: 29703596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. An evaluation scheme for assessing the effectiveness of intersection movement assist (IMA) on improving traffic safety.
    Wu KF; Ardiansyah MN; Ye WJ
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2018 Feb; 19(2):179-183. PubMed ID: 28812374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Analysis of drivers' deceleration behavior based on naturalistic driving data.
    Li S; Li P; Yao Y; Han X; Xu Y; Chen L
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2020; 21(1):42-47. PubMed ID: 31986072
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Evaluation of augmented reality cues to improve the safety of left-turn maneuvers in a connected environment: A driving simulator study.
    Calvi A; D'Amico F; Ferrante C; Bianchini Ciampoli L
    Accid Anal Prev; 2020 Dec; 148():105793. PubMed ID: 33017731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Visual advisory warnings about hidden dangers: Effects of specific symbols and spatial referencing on necessary and unnecessary warnings.
    Schwarz F; Fastenmeier W
    Appl Ergon; 2018 Oct; 72():25-36. PubMed ID: 29885725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Driving performance assessment: effects of traffic accident location and alarm content.
    Chang SH; Lin CY; Fung CP; Hwang JR; Doong JL
    Accid Anal Prev; 2008 Sep; 40(5):1637-43. PubMed ID: 18760090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Effective cues for accelerating young drivers' time to transfer control following a period of conditional automation.
    Wright TJ; Agrawal R; Samuel S; Wang Y; Zilberstein S; Fisher DL
    Accid Anal Prev; 2018 Jul; 116():14-20. PubMed ID: 29031513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. How to present collision warnings at intersections?--a comparison of different approaches.
    Werneke J; Vollrath M
    Accid Anal Prev; 2013 Mar; 52():91-9. PubMed ID: 23305968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Effects of intelligent advanced warnings on drivers negotiating the dilemma zone.
    Gugerty L; McIntyre SE; Link D; Zimmerman K; Tolani D; Huang P; Pokorny RA
    Hum Factors; 2014 Sep; 56(6):1021-35. PubMed ID: 25277014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Evaluation of driver performance with a prototype cyber physical mid-block crossing advanced warning system.
    Angulo AV; Smith BL
    J Safety Res; 2021 Dec; 79():237-245. PubMed ID: 34848004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Volvo drivers' experiences with advanced crash avoidance and related technologies.
    Eichelberger AH; McCartt AT
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2014; 15(2):187-95. PubMed ID: 24345022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. A comparison of tactile, visual, and auditory warnings for rear-end collision prevention in simulated driving.
    Scott JJ; Gray R
    Hum Factors; 2008 Apr; 50(2):264-75. PubMed ID: 18516837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Age and gender differences in time to collision at braking from the 100-Car Naturalistic Driving Study.
    Montgomery J; Kusano KD; Gabler HC
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2014; 15 Suppl 1():S15-20. PubMed ID: 25307380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Evaluation of cooperative systems on driver behavior in heavy fog condition based on a driving simulator.
    Chang X; Li H; Qin L; Rong J; Lu Y; Chen X
    Accid Anal Prev; 2019 Jul; 128():197-205. PubMed ID: 31054492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Toyota drivers' experiences with Dynamic Radar Cruise Control, Pre-Collision System, and Lane-Keeping Assist.
    Eichelberger AH; McCartt AT
    J Safety Res; 2016 Feb; 56():67-73. PubMed ID: 26875167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Analysis of effects of driver's evasive action time on rear-end collision risk using a driving simulator.
    Shah D; Lee C
    J Safety Res; 2021 Sep; 78():242-250. PubMed ID: 34399920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Eye movement and brake reactions to real world brake-capacity forward collision warnings--a naturalistic driving study.
    Wege C; Will S; Victor T
    Accid Anal Prev; 2013 Sep; 58():259-70. PubMed ID: 23068426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The effects of warning characteristics on driver behavior in connected vehicles systems with missed warnings.
    Zhang Y; Wu C; Qiao C; Hou Y
    Accid Anal Prev; 2019 Mar; 124():138-145. PubMed ID: 30639686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Tactile warning signals for in-vehicle systems.
    Meng F; Spence C
    Accid Anal Prev; 2015 Feb; 75():333-46. PubMed ID: 25569607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.