These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

475 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31986072)

  • 1. Analysis of drivers' deceleration behavior based on naturalistic driving data.
    Li S; Li P; Yao Y; Han X; Xu Y; Chen L
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2020; 21(1):42-47. PubMed ID: 31986072
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effects of peripheral transverse line markings on drivers' speed and headway choice and crash risk in car-following: A naturalistic observation study.
    Ding N; Zhu S; Jiao N; Liu B
    Accid Anal Prev; 2020 Oct; 146():105701. PubMed ID: 32823033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Analysis of Driver Evasive Maneuvering Prior to Intersection Crashes Using Event Data Recorders.
    Scanlon JM; Kusano KD; Gabler HC
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2015; 16 Suppl 2():S182-9. PubMed ID: 26436230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Autonomous emergency braking systems adapted to snowy road conditions improve drivers' perceived safety and trust.
    Koglbauer I; Holzinger J; Eichberger A; Lex C
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2018 Apr; 19(3):332-337. PubMed ID: 29227692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Modelling braking behaviour and accident probability of drivers under increasing time pressure conditions.
    Pawar NM; Khanuja RK; Choudhary P; Velaga NR
    Accid Anal Prev; 2020 Mar; 136():105401. PubMed ID: 31884236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Can vehicle longitudinal jerk be used to identify aggressive drivers? An examination using naturalistic driving data.
    Feng F; Bao S; Sayer JR; Flannagan C; Manser M; Wunderlich R
    Accid Anal Prev; 2017 Jul; 104():125-136. PubMed ID: 28499141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Assessing Drivers' Trust of Automated Vehicle Driving Styles With a Two-Part Mixed Model of Intervention Tendency and Magnitude.
    Lee JD; Liu SY; Domeyer J; DinparastDjadid A
    Hum Factors; 2021 Mar; 63(2):197-209. PubMed ID: 31596618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Using perceptual cues for brake response to a lead vehicle: Comparing threshold and accumulator models of visual looming.
    Xue Q; Markkula G; Yan X; Merat N
    Accid Anal Prev; 2018 Sep; 118():114-124. PubMed ID: 29929099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effect of alcohol use on accelerating and braking behaviors of drivers.
    Yadav AK; Velaga NR
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2019; 20(4):353-358. PubMed ID: 31039040
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. An examination of teen drivers' car-following behavior under naturalistic driving conditions: With and without an advanced driving assistance system.
    Bao S; Wu L; Yu B; Sayer JR
    Accid Anal Prev; 2020 Nov; 147():105762. PubMed ID: 32942123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. How does intersection field of view influence driving safety in an emergent situation?
    Yan X; Zhang X; Xue Q
    Accid Anal Prev; 2018 Oct; 119():162-175. PubMed ID: 30036817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The effect of an occlusion-induced delay on braking behavior in critical situations: A driving simulator study.
    de Winter JCF; Saffarian M; Senders JW
    Hum Factors; 2023 Nov; 65(7):1336-1344. PubMed ID: 35620977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evaluation Research of the Effects of Longitudinal Speed Reduction Markings on Driving Behavior: A Driving Simulator Study.
    Ding H; Zhao X; Ma J; Rong J
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2016 Nov; 13(11):. PubMed ID: 27886107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A rear-end collision risk assessment model based on drivers' collision avoidance process under influences of cell phone use and gender-A driving simulator based study.
    Li X; Yan X; Wu J; Radwan E; Zhang Y
    Accid Anal Prev; 2016 Dec; 97():1-18. PubMed ID: 27565040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Impact of headway distance and car speed on drivers' decisions to answer an incoming call.
    Pouyakian M; Mahabadi HA; Yazdi SM; Hajizadeh E; Nahvi A
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2013; 14(7):749-55. PubMed ID: 23944976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Predicting crash-relevant violations at stop sign-controlled intersections for the development of an intersection driver assistance system.
    Scanlon JM; Sherony R; Gabler HC
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2016 Sep; 17 Suppl 1():59-65. PubMed ID: 27586104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Drivers anticipate lead-vehicle conflicts during automated longitudinal control: Sensory cues capture driver attention and promote appropriate and timely responses.
    Morando A; Victor T; Dozza M
    Accid Anal Prev; 2016 Dec; 97():206-219. PubMed ID: 27658227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Heavy-truck drivers' following behavior with intervention of an integrated, in-vehicle crash warning system: a field evaluation.
    Bao S; LeBlanc DJ; Sayer JR; Flannagan C
    Hum Factors; 2012 Oct; 54(5):687-97. PubMed ID: 23156615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Modeling driver's braking and steering behavior along horizontal curves of two-lane rural highways for ADAS applications.
    Choudhari T; Maji A
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2022; 23(7):404-409. PubMed ID: 35862932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Examination of drivers' cell phone use behavior at intersections by using naturalistic driving data.
    Xiong H; Bao S; Sayer J; Kato K
    J Safety Res; 2015 Sep; 54():89-93. PubMed ID: 26403907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 24.