These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

236 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31986982)

  • 1. The unequal variance signal-detection model of recognition memory: Investigating the encoding variability hypothesis.
    Spanton RW; Berry CJ
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2020 Aug; 73(8):1242-1260. PubMed ID: 31986982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Does variability in recognition memory scale with mean memory strength or encoding variability in the UVSD model?
    Spanton RW; Berry CJ
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2023 Sep; 76(9):2037-2052. PubMed ID: 36274514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Examining the causes of memory strength variability: recollection, attention failure, or encoding variability?
    Koen JD; Aly M; Wang WC; Yonelinas AP
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2013 Nov; 39(6):1726-41. PubMed ID: 23834057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Three tests and three corrections: comment on Koen and Yonelinas (2010).
    Jang Y; Mickes L; Wixted JT
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2012 Mar; 38(2):513-23. PubMed ID: 22390323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Memory variability is due to the contribution of recollection and familiarity, not to encoding variability.
    Koen JD; Yonelinas AP
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2010 Nov; 36(6):1536-42. PubMed ID: 20854009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Ensemble coding of memory strength in recognition tests.
    Dubé C; Tong K; Westfall H; Bauer E
    Mem Cognit; 2019 Jul; 47(5):936-953. PubMed ID: 30919277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effects of pre-experimental knowledge on recognition memory.
    Bird CM; Davies RA; Ward J; Burgess N
    Learn Mem; 2011 Jan; 18(1):11-4. PubMed ID: 21164172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Probability of target recollection varies with target-lure relatedness under the dual process signal detection model.
    Dopkins S; Galyer D
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2019 Oct; 201():102933. PubMed ID: 31739089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Retrieval dynamics of recognition and rejection.
    Papesh MH; Hicks JL; Guevara Pinto JD
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2019 Sep; 72(9):2328-2341. PubMed ID: 30808272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Some-or-none recollection: Evidence from item and source memory.
    Onyper SV; Zhang YX; Howard MW
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2010 May; 139(2):341-64. PubMed ID: 20438255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Recognition receiver operating characteristic asymmetry: Increased noise or information?
    Dobbins IG
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2023 Feb; 49(2):216-229. PubMed ID: 36996188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Item-specific processing reduces false recognition in older and younger adults: Separating encoding and retrieval using signal detection and the diffusion model.
    Huff MJ; Aschenbrenner AJ
    Mem Cognit; 2018 Nov; 46(8):1287-1301. PubMed ID: 29959616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Eye-closure & the retrieval of item-specific information in recognition memory.
    Parker A; Dagnall N
    Conscious Cogn; 2020 Jan; 77():102858. PubMed ID: 31837571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparing single- and dual-process models of memory development.
    Hayes BK; Dunn JC; Joubert A; Taylor R
    Dev Sci; 2017 Nov; 20(6):. PubMed ID: 27659763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. List-strength effects in older adults in recognition and free recall.
    Sahakyan L
    Mem Cognit; 2019 May; 47(4):764-778. PubMed ID: 30607754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The distribution of subjective memory strength: list strength and response bias.
    Criss AH
    Cogn Psychol; 2009 Dec; 59(4):297-319. PubMed ID: 19765699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The effects of encoding instruction and opportunity on the recollection of behaviourally relevant events.
    Broitman AW; Swallow KM
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2020 May; 73(5):711-725. PubMed ID: 31747827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The attentional boost effect in free recall dynamics.
    Broitman AW; Swallow KM
    Mem Cognit; 2024 May; 52(4):752-770. PubMed ID: 38082026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Self-referent encoding facilitates memory binding in young children: New insights into the self-reference effect in memory development.
    Andrews G; Murphy K; Dunbar M
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2020 Oct; 198():104919. PubMed ID: 32629234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Everyday amnesia: Residual memory for high confidence misses and implications for decision models of recognition.
    Berry CJ; Shanks DR
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2024 Jul; 153(7):1790-1815. PubMed ID: 38661632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.