259 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31987041)
1. Measurement error and reliability of three available 3D superimposition methods in growing patients.
Ponce-Garcia C; Ruellas ACO; Cevidanes LHS; Flores-Mir C; Carey JP; Lagravere-Vich M
Head Face Med; 2020 Jan; 16(1):1. PubMed ID: 31987041
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Evaluation of two-dimensional lateral cephalogram and three-dimensional cone beam computed tomography superimpositions: a comparative study.
Heinz J; Stewart K; Ghoneima A
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2019 Apr; 48(4):519-525. PubMed ID: 30342757
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Accuracy and reliability of landmark-based, surface-based and voxel-based 3D cone-beam computed tomography superimposition methods.
Ghoneima A; Cho H; Farouk K; Kula K
Orthod Craniofac Res; 2017 Nov; 20(4):227-236. PubMed ID: 28960842
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Voxel-based superimposition of serial craniofacial CBCTs: Reliability, reproducibility and segmentation effect on hard-tissue outcomes.
Häner ST; Kanavakis G; Matthey F; Gkantidis N
Orthod Craniofac Res; 2020 Feb; 23(1):92-101. PubMed ID: 31529585
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Accuracy and reliability of three-dimensional craniofacial cone-beam CT superimposition method based on voxel registration].
Zhou GH; Chen L; Sun YY; Ge N; Su L; Bai YX
Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2016 Aug; 51(8):475-9. PubMed ID: 27511038
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. United Reference Method for three-dimensional treatment evaluation.
Shahen S; Lagravère MO; Carrino G; Fahim F; Abdelsalam R; Flores-Mir C; Perillo L
Prog Orthod; 2018 Dec; 19(1):47. PubMed ID: 30506410
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Linear measurements of sinus floor elevation based on voxel-based superimposition of cone beam computed tomography images.
Huang J; Hu J; Luo R; Xie S; Wang Z; Ye Y
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2019 Oct; 21(5):1048-1053. PubMed ID: 31392828
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Voxel-based superimposition of Cone Beam CT scans for orthodontic and craniofacial follow-up: Overview and clinical implementation.
Dot G; Rafflenbeul F; Salmon B
Int Orthod; 2020 Dec; 18(4):739-748. PubMed ID: 33011138
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Linear accuracy and reliability of cone beam CT derived 3-dimensional images constructed using an orthodontic volumetric rendering program.
Periago DR; Scarfe WC; Moshiri M; Scheetz JP; Silveira AM; Farman AG
Angle Orthod; 2008 May; 78(3):387-95. PubMed ID: 18416632
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Precision and reliability of Dolphin 3-dimensional voxel-based superimposition.
Bazina M; Cevidanes L; Ruellas A; Valiathan M; Quereshy F; Syed A; Wu R; Palomo JM
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2018 Apr; 153(4):599-606. PubMed ID: 29602352
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Malocclusion Class II division 1 skeletal and dental relationships measured by cone-beam computed tomography.
Xu Y; Oh H; Lagravère MO
Int Orthod; 2017 Sep; 15(3):365-387. PubMed ID: 28818647
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Exploring a new method for superimposition of pre-treatment and post-treatment mandibular digital dental casts in adults].
Dai FF; Liu Y; Xu TM; Chen G
Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2018 Apr; 50(2):271-278. PubMed ID: 29643526
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. 3D landmarks of Craniofacial Imaging and subsequent considerations on superimpositions in orthodontics-The Aarhus perspective.
Cattaneo PM; Yung AKC; Holm A; Mashaly OM; Cornelis MA
Orthod Craniofac Res; 2019 May; 22 Suppl 1():21-29. PubMed ID: 31074143
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Reliability and the smallest detectable difference of measurements on 3-dimensional cone-beam computed tomography images.
Damstra J; Fourie Z; Huddleston Slater JJ; Ren Y
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Sep; 140(3):e107-14. PubMed ID: 21889058
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of linear and angular changes assessed in digital dental models and cone-beam computed tomography.
Massaro C; Losada C; Cevidanes L; Yatabe M; Garib D; Lauris JRP; Ioshida M; Rey D; Alvarez MA; Benavides E; Rios H; Aristizabal JF; Ruellas AC
Orthod Craniofac Res; 2020 Feb; 23(1):118-128. PubMed ID: 31628885
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. kVp, mA, and voxel size effect on 3D voxel-based superimposition.
Eliliwi M; Bazina M; Palomo JM
Angle Orthod; 2020 Mar; 90(2):269-277. PubMed ID: 31549857
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Voxel-based superimposition of serial craniofacial cone-beam computed tomographies for facial soft tissue assessment: Reproducibility and segmentation effects.
Kanavakis G; Häner ST; Matthey F; Gkantidis N
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2021 Mar; 159(3):343-351.e1. PubMed ID: 33641815
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Rapid 3D mandibular superimposition for growing patients.
Koerich L; Weissheimer A; de Menezes LM; Lindauer SJ
Angle Orthod; 2017 May; 87(3):473-479. PubMed ID: 27767348
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The reliability of cephalometric measurements in oral and maxillofacial imaging: Cone beam computed tomography versus two-dimensional digital cephalograms.
Hariharan A; Diwakar NR; Jayanthi K; Hema HM; Deepukrishna S; Ghaste SR
Indian J Dent Res; 2016; 27(4):370-377. PubMed ID: 27723632
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Fast three-dimensional superimposition of cone beam computed tomography for orthopaedics and orthognathic surgery evaluation.
Weissheimer A; Menezes LM; Koerich L; Pham J; Cevidanes LH
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2015 Sep; 44(9):1188-96. PubMed ID: 25935632
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
