BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

362 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31988232)

  • 1. The Pre-BRA (pre-pectoral Breast Reconstruction EvAluation) feasibility study: protocol for a mixed-methods IDEAL 2a/2b prospective cohort study to determine the safety and effectiveness of prepectoral implant-based breast reconstruction.
    Harvey KL; Mills N; White P; Holcombe C; Potter S;
    BMJ Open; 2020 Jan; 10(1):e033641. PubMed ID: 31988232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Short-term safety outcomes of mastectomy and immediate prepectoral implant-based breast reconstruction: Pre-BRA prospective multicentre cohort study.
    Harvey KL; Sinai P; Mills N; White P; Holcombe C; Potter S;
    Br J Surg; 2022 May; 109(6):530-538. PubMed ID: 35576373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Best-BRA (Is subpectoral or prepectoral implant placement best in immediate breast reconstruction?): a protocol for a pilot randomised controlled trial of subpectoral versus prepectoral immediate implant-based breast reconstruction in women following mastectomy.
    Roberts K; Mills N; Metcalfe C; Lane A; Clement C; Hollingworth W; Taylor J; Holcombe C; Skillman J; Fairhurst K; Whisker L; Cutress R; Thrush S; Fairbrother P; Potter S
    BMJ Open; 2021 Nov; 11(11):e050886. PubMed ID: 34848516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Prepectoral versus subpectoral implant-based breast reconstruction after skin-sparing mastectomy or nipple-sparing mastectomy (OPBC-02/ PREPEC): a pragmatic, multicentre, randomised, superiority trial.
    Kappos EA; Schulz A; Regan MM; Moffa G; Harder Y; Ribi K; Potter S; Pusic AL; Fehr MK; Hemkens LG; Holzbach T; Farhadi J; Simonson C; Knauer M; Verstappen R; Bucher HC; Zwahlen D; Zimmermann F; Schwenkglenks M; Mucklow R; Shaw J; Bjelic-Radisic V; Chiorescu A; Chun YS; Farah S; Xiaosong C; Nigard L; Kuemmel S; Reitsamer R; Hauschild M; Fulco I; Tausch C; Fischer T; Sarlos D; Constantinescu MA; Lupatsch JE; Fitzal F; Heil J; Matrai Z; de Boniface J; Kurzeder C; Haug M; Weber WP
    BMJ Open; 2021 Sep; 11(9):e045239. PubMed ID: 34475143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Protocol for a mixed-method study to inform the feasibility of undertaking a large-scale multicentre study comparing the clinical and patient-reported outcomes of oncoplastic breast conservation as an alternative to mastectomy with or without immediate breast reconstruction in women unsuitable for standard breast-conserving surgery (the ANTHEM Feasibility Study).
    Davies C; Holcombe C; Skillman J; Whisker L; Hollingworth W; Conefrey C; Mills N; White P; Comins C; Macmillan D; Fairbrother P; Potter S
    BMJ Open; 2021 Apr; 11(4):e046622. PubMed ID: 33863715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Short-term safety outcomes of mastectomy and immediate implant-based breast reconstruction with and without mesh (iBRA): a multicentre, prospective cohort study.
    Potter S; Conroy EJ; Cutress RI; Williamson PR; Whisker L; Thrush S; Skillman J; Barnes NLP; Mylvaganam S; Teasdale E; Jain A; Gardiner MD; Blazeby JM; Holcombe C; ;
    Lancet Oncol; 2019 Feb; 20(2):254-266. PubMed ID: 30639093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The iBRA-2 (immediate breast reconstruction and adjuvant therapy audit) study: protocol for a prospective national multicentre cohort study to evaluate the impact of immediate breast reconstruction on the delivery of adjuvant therapy.
    Dave R; O'Connell R; Rattay T; Tolkien Z; Barnes N; Skillman J; Williamson P; Conroy E; Gardiner M; Harnett A; O'Brien C; Blazeby J; Potter S; Holcombe C;
    BMJ Open; 2016 Oct; 6(10):e012678. PubMed ID: 27855106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A Prospective Comparison of Short-Term Outcomes of Subpectoral and Prepectoral Strattice-Based Immediate Breast Reconstruction.
    Baker BG; Irri R; MacCallum V; Chattopadhyay R; Murphy J; Harvey JR
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2018 May; 141(5):1077-1084. PubMed ID: 29697602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Quality of Life and Early Functional Evaluation in Direct-to-Implant Breast Reconstruction After Mastectomy: A Comparative Study Between Prepectoral Versus Dual-Plane Reconstruction.
    Caputo GG; Zingaretti N; Kiprianidis I; Zanfisi C; Domenici L; Parodi PC; Governa M
    Clin Breast Cancer; 2021 Aug; 21(4):344-351. PubMed ID: 33308993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. One-Step Prepectoral Breast Reconstruction With Dermal Matrix-Covered Implant Compared to Submuscular Implantation: Functional and Cost Evaluation.
    Cattelani L; Polotto S; Arcuri MF; Pedrazzi G; Linguadoca C; Bonati E
    Clin Breast Cancer; 2018 Aug; 18(4):e703-e711. PubMed ID: 29275104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Direct-to-Implant Extracellular Matrix Hammock-based Breast Reconstruction; Prepectoral or Subpectoral?
    Dyrberg DL; Gunnarsson GL; Bille C; Sørensen JA; Thomsen JB
    Trials; 2020 Feb; 21(1):160. PubMed ID: 32041661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Protocol for a national cohort study to explore the long-term clinical and patient-reported outcomes and cost-effectiveness of implant-based and autologous breast reconstruction after mastectomy for breast cancer: the brighter study.
    Johnson L; Holcombe C; O'Donoghue JM; Jeevan R; Browne J; Fairbrother P; MacKenzie M; Gulliver-Clarke C; White P; Mohiuddin S; Hollingworth W; Potter S
    BMJ Open; 2021 Aug; 11(8):e054055. PubMed ID: 34408062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A prospective comparison study of early functional outcomes after implant-based breast reconstruction: subpectoral versus prepectoral technique.
    Lee JS; Park E; Lee JH; Lee J; Park HY; Yang JD; Jung TD
    Ann Palliat Med; 2021 Mar; 10(3):2520-2529. PubMed ID: 33691448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The iBRA (implant breast reconstruction evaluation) study: protocol for a prospective multi-centre cohort study to inform the feasibility, design and conduct of a pragmatic randomised clinical trial comparing new techniques of implant-based breast reconstruction.
    Potter S; Conroy EJ; Williamson PR; Thrush S; Whisker LJ; Skillman JM; Barnes NL; Cutress RI; Teasdale EM; Mills N; Mylvaganam S; Branford OA; McEvoy K; Jain A; Gardiner MD; Blazeby JM; Holcombe C;
    Pilot Feasibility Stud; 2016; 2():41. PubMed ID: 27965859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Current Global Trends in Prepectoral Breast Reconstruction.
    Taj S; Chandavarkar R; Vidya R
    Medicina (Kaunas); 2024 Mar; 60(3):. PubMed ID: 38541157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evaluation of Prepectoral Implant Placement and Complete Coverage with TiLoop Bra Mesh for Breast Reconstruction: A Prospective Study on Long-Term and Patient-Reported BREAST-Q Outcomes.
    Casella D; Di Taranto G; Marcasciano M; Sordi S; Kothari A; Kovacs T; Lo Torto F; Cigna E; Calabrese C; Ribuffo D
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2019 Jan; 143(1):1e-9e. PubMed ID: 30303929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Immediate prepectoral implant reconstruction using TiLOOP Bra Pocket results in improved patient satisfaction over dual plane reconstruction.
    Ng EI; Quah GS; Graham S; Kanesalingam K; Meybodi F; Hsu J; Elder EE; French J
    ANZ J Surg; 2021 Apr; 91(4):701-707. PubMed ID: 33634944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Patient-reported outcomes of immediate implant-based breast reconstruction with and without biological or synthetic mesh.
    Sewart E; Turner NL; Conroy EJ; Cutress RI; Skillman J; Whisker L; Thrush S; Barnes N; Holcombe C; Potter S;
    BJS Open; 2021 Jan; 5(1):. PubMed ID: 33609398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Chinese multicentre prospective registry of breast cancer patient-reported outcome-reconstruction and oncoplastic cohort (PRO-ROC): a study protocol.
    Li L; Yang B; Li H; Yin J; Jin F; Han S; Liao N; Shi J; Ling R; Li Z; Ouyang L; Wang X; Fu P; Ouyang Z; Ma B; Wu X; Wang H; Liu J; Shao Z; Wu J
    BMJ Open; 2019 Dec; 9(12):e032945. PubMed ID: 31843846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Variation in the provision and practice of implant-based breast reconstruction in the UK: Results from the iBRA national practice questionnaire.
    Mylvaganam S; Conroy E; Williamson PR; Barnes NLP; Cutress RI; Gardiner MD; Jain A; Skillman JM; Thrush S; Whisker LJ; Blazeby JM; Potter S; Holcombe C; ;
    Breast; 2017 Oct; 35():182-190. PubMed ID: 28768227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 19.