These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

143 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31988445)

  • 1. Phenotypic memory drives population growth and extinction risk in a noisy environment.
    Rescan M; Grulois D; Ortega-Aboud E; Chevin LM
    Nat Ecol Evol; 2020 Feb; 4(2):193-201. PubMed ID: 31988445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Predicting population genetic change in an autocorrelated random environment: Insights from a large automated experiment.
    Rescan M; Grulois D; Aboud EO; de Villemereuil P; Chevin LM
    PLoS Genet; 2021 Jun; 17(6):e1009611. PubMed ID: 34161327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Experimental evolution of environmental tolerance, acclimation, and physiological plasticity in a randomly fluctuating environment.
    Rescan M; Leurs N; Grulois D; Chevin LM
    Evol Lett; 2022 Dec; 6(6):522-536. PubMed ID: 36579167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Reduced phenotypic plasticity evolves in less predictable environments.
    Leung C; Rescan M; Grulois D; Chevin LM
    Ecol Lett; 2020 Nov; 23(11):1664-1672. PubMed ID: 32869431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Stochastic Evolutionary Demography under a Fluctuating Optimum Phenotype.
    Chevin LM; Cotto O; Ashander J
    Am Nat; 2017 Dec; 190(6):786-802. PubMed ID: 29166162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Poor environmental tracking can make extinction risk insensitive to the colour of environmental noise.
    van de Pol M; Vindenes Y; Sæther BE; Engen S; Ens BJ; Oosterbeek K; Tinbergen JM
    Proc Biol Sci; 2011 Dec; 278(1725):3713-22. PubMed ID: 21561978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Temporally Autocorrelated Environmental Fluctuations Inhibit the Evolution of Stress Tolerance.
    Wieczynski DJ; Turner PE; Vasseur DA
    Am Nat; 2018 Jun; 191(6):E195-E207. PubMed ID: 29750560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Trait-based predictions and responses from laboratory mite populations to harvesting in stochastic environments.
    Smallegange IM; Ens HM
    J Anim Ecol; 2018 Jul; 87(4):893-905. PubMed ID: 29931772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Confounding environmental colour and distribution shape leads to underestimation of population extinction risk.
    Fowler MS; Ruokolainen L
    PLoS One; 2013; 8(2):e55855. PubMed ID: 23409065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Temporal autocorrelation in host density increases establishment success of parasitoids in an experimental system.
    Vercken E; Fauvergue X; Ris N; Crochard D; Mailleret L
    Ecol Evol; 2015 Jul; 5(13):2684-93. PubMed ID: 26257880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Extinction risk in a temporally correlated fluctuating environment.
    Johst K; Wissel C
    Theor Popul Biol; 1997 Oct; 52(2):91-100. PubMed ID: 9356326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. How differing modes of non-genetic inheritance affect population viability in fluctuating environments.
    Proulx SR; Dey S; Guzella T; Teotónio H
    Ecol Lett; 2019 Nov; 22(11):1767-1775. PubMed ID: 31436016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. An updated perspective on the role of environmental autocorrelation in animal populations.
    Ferguson JM; Carvalho F; Murillo-García O; Taper ML; Ponciano JM
    Theor Ecol; 2016 Jun; 9(2):129-148. PubMed ID: 27158281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The inflationary effects of environmental fluctuations ensure the persistence of sink metapopulations.
    Matthews DP; Gonzalez A
    Ecology; 2007 Nov; 88(11):2848-56. PubMed ID: 18051654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Food web dynamics in correlated and autocorrelated environments.
    Ripa J; Ives AR
    Theor Popul Biol; 2003 Nov; 64(3):369-84. PubMed ID: 14522176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Spatial synchrony and harvesting in fluctuating populations:Relaxing the small noise assumption.
    Engen S
    Theor Popul Biol; 2017 Aug; 116():18-26. PubMed ID: 28624421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The effect of autocorrelation in environmental variability on the persistence of populations: an experimental test.
    Pike N; Tully T; Haccou P; Ferrière R
    Proc Biol Sci; 2004 Oct; 271(1553):2143-8. PubMed ID: 15475334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Environmental colour affects aspects of single-species population dynamics.
    Petchey OL
    Proc Biol Sci; 2000 Apr; 267(1445):747-54. PubMed ID: 10819142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Does red noise increase or decrease extinction risk? Single extreme events versus series of unfavorable conditions.
    Schwager M; Johst K; Jeltsch F
    Am Nat; 2006 Jun; 167(6):879-88. PubMed ID: 16615033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Forecasting extinction risk with nonstationary matrix models.
    Gotelli NJ; Ellison AM
    Ecol Appl; 2006 Feb; 16(1):51-61. PubMed ID: 16705960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.