259 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3198862)
1. Evaluation of two voice-separation algorithms using normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.
Stubbs RJ; Summerfield Q
J Acoust Soc Am; 1988 Oct; 84(4):1236-49. PubMed ID: 3198862
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Algorithms for separating the speech of interfering talkers: evaluations with voiced sentences, and normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.
Stubbs RJ; Summerfield Q
J Acoust Soc Am; 1990 Jan; 87(1):359-72. PubMed ID: 2299046
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Spectral cues to perception of /d, n, l/ by normal- and impaired-hearing listeners.
Revoile SG; Pickett JM; Kozma-Spytek L
J Acoust Soc Am; 1991 Aug; 90(2 Pt 1):787-98. PubMed ID: 1939885
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Impact of spectrally asynchronous delays on consonant voicing perception.
Ortmann AJ; Palmer CV; Pratt SR
J Am Acad Audiol; 2010 Sep; 21(8):493-511. PubMed ID: 21034697
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effects of signal-to-noise ratio, signal periodicity, and degree of hearing impairment on the performance of voice-separation algorithms.
Stubbs RJ; Summerfield Q
J Acoust Soc Am; 1991 Mar; 89(3):1383-93. PubMed ID: 2030226
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Role of fundamental frequency differences in the perceptual separation of competing vowel sounds by listeners with normal hearing and listeners with hearing loss.
Arehart KH; King CA; McLean-Mudgett KS
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 1997 Dec; 40(6):1434-44. PubMed ID: 9430762
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of frequency selectivity and consonant recognition among hearing-impaired and masked normal-hearing listeners.
Dubno JR; Schaefer AB
J Acoust Soc Am; 1992 Apr; 91(4 Pt 1):2110-21. PubMed ID: 1597602
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Temporal overshoot in simultaneous-masked psychophysical tuning curves from normal and hearing-impaired listeners.
Kimberley BP; Nelson DA; Bacon SP
J Acoust Soc Am; 1989 Apr; 85(4):1660-5. PubMed ID: 2708681
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Word recognition for temporally and spectrally distorted materials: the effects of age and hearing loss.
Smith SL; Pichora-Fuller MK; Wilson RH; Macdonald EN
Ear Hear; 2012; 33(3):349-66. PubMed ID: 22343546
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The influence of talker differences on vowel identification by normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.
Nábĕlek AK; Czyzewski Z; Krishnan LA
J Acoust Soc Am; 1992 Sep; 92(3):1228-46. PubMed ID: 1401512
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. FO processing and the separation of competing speech signals by listeners with normal hearing and with hearing loss.
Summers V; Leek MR
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 1998 Dec; 41(6):1294-306. PubMed ID: 9859885
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The influence of reduced audible bandwidth on asynchronous double-vowel identification.
Valentine S; Lentz JJ
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2012 Dec; 55(6):1750-64. PubMed ID: 22615479
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Perception of temporally processed speech by listeners with hearing impairment.
Calandruccio L; Doherty KA; Carney LH; Kikkeri HN
Ear Hear; 2007 Aug; 28(4):512-23. PubMed ID: 17609613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Minimum spectral contrast for vowel identification by normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.
Leek MR; Dorman MF; Summerfield Q
J Acoust Soc Am; 1987 Jan; 81(1):148-54. PubMed ID: 3819173
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Phoneme recognition in vocoded maskers by normal-hearing and aided hearing-impaired listeners.
Phatak SA; Grant KW
J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Aug; 136(2):859-66. PubMed ID: 25096119
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Evaluation of the sparse coding shrinkage noise reduction algorithm in normal hearing and hearing impaired listeners.
Sang J; Hu H; Zheng C; Li G; Lutman ME; Bleeck S
Hear Res; 2014 Apr; 310():36-47. PubMed ID: 24495441
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Talker differences in clear and conversational speech: vowel intelligibility for older adults with hearing loss.
Ferguson SH
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2012 Jun; 55(3):779-90. PubMed ID: 22223894
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Aided and unaided speech perception by older hearing impaired listeners.
Woods DL; Arbogast T; Doss Z; Younus M; Herron TJ; Yund EW
PLoS One; 2015; 10(3):e0114922. PubMed ID: 25730423
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Auditory filter characteristics and consonant recognition for hearing-impaired listeners.
Dubno JR; Dirks DD
J Acoust Soc Am; 1989 Apr; 85(4):1666-75. PubMed ID: 2708682
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The representation of the spectra and fundamental frequencies of steady-state single- and double-vowel sounds in the temporal discharge patterns of guinea pig cochlear-nerve fibers.
Palmer AR
J Acoust Soc Am; 1990 Sep; 88(3):1412-26. PubMed ID: 2229676
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
