These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

118 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3198868)

  • 1. Duration discrimination of steady and gliding tones: a new method for estimating sensitivity to rate of change.
    Dooley GJ; Moore BC
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1988 Oct; 84(4):1332-7. PubMed ID: 3198868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Thresholds for the detection of inharmonicity in complex tones.
    Moore BC; Peters RW; Glasberg BR
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1985 May; 77(5):1861-7. PubMed ID: 3998296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Detection and discrimination of frequency glides as a function of direction, duration, frequency span, and center frequency.
    Madden JP; Fire KM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1997 Nov; 102(5 Pt 1):2920-4. PubMed ID: 9373978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Detection thresholds for sinusoidal frequency modulation.
    Demany L; Semal C
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1989 Mar; 85(3):1295-301. PubMed ID: 2708671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Detection of tones in noise and the "severe departure" from Weber's law.
    Carlyon RP; Moore BC
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1986 Feb; 79(2):461-4. PubMed ID: 3950199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Discrimination and identification of modulation rate using a noise carrier.
    Hanna TE
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1992 Apr; 91(4 Pt 1):2122-8. PubMed ID: 1597603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Frequency and duration discrimination of short first-formant speechlike transitions.
    van Wieringen A; Pols LC
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1994 Jan; 95(1):502-11. PubMed ID: 8120261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Differential sensitivity to tonal frequency and to the rate of amplitude modulation of broadband noise by normally hearing listeners.
    Formby C
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1985 Jul; 78(1 Pt 1):70-7. PubMed ID: 4019909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effects of age and frequency disparity on gap discrimination.
    Lister J; Besing J; Koehnke J
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2002 Jun; 111(6):2793-800. PubMed ID: 12083214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Stimulus features affecting psychophysical detection thresholds for electrical stimulation of the cochlea. I: Phase duration and stimulus duration.
    Pfingst BE; DeHaan DR; Holloway LA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1991 Oct; 90(4 Pt 1):1857-66. PubMed ID: 1960279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Detection of temporal gaps in sinusoids by normally hearing and hearing-impaired subjects.
    Moore BC; Glasberg BR; Donaldson E; McPherson T; Plack CJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1989 Mar; 85(3):1266-75. PubMed ID: 2708669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Asymmetry of masking between complex tones and noise: the role of temporal structure and peripheral compression.
    Gockel H; Moore BC; Patterson RD
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2002 Jun; 111(6):2759-70. PubMed ID: 12083211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Isolating spectral cues in amplitude and quasi-frequency modulation discrimination by reducing stimulus duration.
    Borucki E; Berg BG
    Hear Res; 2017 May; 348():129-133. PubMed ID: 28284735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The pitch of electrically presented sinusoids.
    Dorman MF; Smith M; Smith L; Parkin JL
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1994 Mar; 95(3):1677-9. PubMed ID: 8176065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Level discrimination of tones as a function of duration.
    Florentine M
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1986 Mar; 79(3):792-8. PubMed ID: 3958321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Descending frequency swept tones have lower thresholds than ascending frequency swept tones for a harbor seal (Phoca vitulina) and human listeners.
    Turnbull SD; Terhune JM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1994 Nov; 96(5 Pt 1):2631-6. PubMed ID: 7983268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comodulation masking release as a function of bandwidth and time delay between on-frequency and flanking-band maskers.
    Moore BC; Schooneveldt GP
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1990 Aug; 88(2):725-31. PubMed ID: 2212296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Auditory phase and frequency discrimination: a comparison of nine procedures.
    Creelman CD; Macmillan NA
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1979 Feb; 5(1):146-56. PubMed ID: 528924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comodulation masking release as a function of level.
    Moore BC; Shailer MJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1991 Aug; 90(2 Pt 1):829-35. PubMed ID: 1939887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Differences in auditory performance between monaural and dichotic conditions. I: masking thresholds in frozen noise.
    Langhans A; Kohlrausch A
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1992 Jun; 91(6):3456-70. PubMed ID: 1619122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.