BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

104 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3198870)

  • 1. Modification of spontaneous and evoked otoacoustic emissions and associated psychoacoustic microstructure by aspirin consumption.
    Long GR; Tubis A
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1988 Oct; 84(4):1343-53. PubMed ID: 3198870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Investigations into the nature of the association between threshold microstructure and otoacoustic emissions.
    Long GR; Tubis A
    Hear Res; 1988 Nov; 36(2-3):125-38. PubMed ID: 3209487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Partial dissociation of spontaneous otoacoustic emissions and distortion products during aspirin use in humans.
    Wier CC; Pasanen EG; McFadden D
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1988 Jul; 84(1):230-7. PubMed ID: 3411052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Spontaneous, click-, and toneburst-evoked otoacoustic emissions from normal ears.
    Probst R; Coats AC; Martin GK; Lonsbury-Martin BL
    Hear Res; 1986; 21(3):261-75. PubMed ID: 3722006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Changes in transitory evoked otoacoustic emissions in chemotherapy with cisplatin and 5FU].
    Beck A; Maurer J; Welkoborsky HJ; Mann W
    HNO; 1992 Apr; 40(4):123-7. PubMed ID: 1601678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The effect of aspirin on cochlear mechanical tuning.
    Brown AM; Williams DM; Gaskill SA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1993 Jun; 93(6):3298-307. PubMed ID: 8326058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Manifestations of intense noise stimulation on spontaneous otoacoustic emission and threshold microstructure: experiment and model.
    Furst M; Reshef I; Attias J
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1992 Feb; 91(2):1003-14. PubMed ID: 1313463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A comparison of the effect of cochlear perfusion with ouabain on summating potentials and distortion product otoacoustic emissions in the guinea pig.
    Klis SF; Rebillard G
    Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 1995; 252(7):405-8. PubMed ID: 8562035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Modulation of auditory percepts by transcutaneous electrical stimulation.
    Ueberfuhr MA; Braun A; Wiegrebe L; Grothe B; Drexl M
    Hear Res; 2017 Jul; 350():235-243. PubMed ID: 28323018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Evoked acoustic oto-emissions: effects of atropine].
    Salonna I; Bartoli R; Longo G
    Boll Soc Ital Biol Sper; 1990 Feb; 66(2):167-71. PubMed ID: 2357335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Effect of intravenous injection of aspirin on the cochlea].
    Kumagai M
    Hokkaido Igaku Zasshi; 1992 Mar; 67(2):216-33. PubMed ID: 1597302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Modeling otoacoustic emission and hearing threshold fine structures.
    Talmadge CL; Tubis A; Long GR; Piskorski P
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1998 Sep; 104(3 Pt 1):1517-43. PubMed ID: 9745736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evoked acoustic emissions from the human ear. I. Equipment and response parameters.
    Johnsen NJ; Elberling C
    Scand Audiol; 1982; 11(1):3-12. PubMed ID: 7178800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effect of aspirin on phase gradient of 2F1-F2 distortion product otoacoustic emissions.
    Parazzini M; Hall AJ; Lutman ME; Kapadia S
    Hear Res; 2005 Jul; 205(1-2):44-52. PubMed ID: 15953514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The effect of treatment with vincristine on transient evoked and distortion product otoacoustic emissions.
    Riga M; Psarommatis I; Korres S; Lyra Ch; Papadeas E; Varvutsi M; Ferekidis E; Apostolopoulos N
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2006 Jun; 70(6):1003-8. PubMed ID: 16359737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evoked otoacoustic emissions as cochlear Bragg reflections.
    Strube HW
    Hear Res; 1989 Mar; 38(1-2):35-45. PubMed ID: 2708158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Distortion product emissions in humans. II. Relations to acoustic immittance and stimulus frequency and spontaneous otoacoustic emissions in normally hearing subjects.
    Lonsbury-Martin BL; Harris FP; Stagner BB; Hawkins MD; Martin GK
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl; 1990 May; 147():15-29. PubMed ID: 2110796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Transient-evoked otoacoustic emissions in children after cisplatin chemotherapy.
    Allen GC; Tiu C; Koike K; Ritchey AK; Kurs-Lasky M; Wax MK
    Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 1998 May; 118(5):584-8. PubMed ID: 9591854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The effect of various durations of noise exposure on auditory brainstem response, distortion product otoacoustic emissions and transient evoked otoacoustic emissions in rats.
    Fraenkel R; Freeman S; Sohmer H
    Audiol Neurootol; 2001; 6(1):40-9. PubMed ID: 11173774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effects of furosemide on distortion product otoacoustic emissions and on neuronal responses in the anteroventral cochlear nucleus.
    Rübsamen R; Mills DM; Rubel EW
    J Neurophysiol; 1995 Oct; 74(4):1628-38. PubMed ID: 8989399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.