These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

107 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31989736)

  • 1. Metallization and Ar-O plasma effects on dental enamel roughness evaluated with SEM and MeX™ for 3D reconstruction.
    Hauss Monteiro DD; Limborço H; Porto RG; Moreira AN; Rodrigues WN; de Magalhães CS
    Microsc Res Tech; 2020 Jun; 83(6):597-603. PubMed ID: 31989736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. In-vivo evaluation of the surface roughness and morphology of enamel after bracket removal and polishing by different techniques.
    Faria-Júnior ÉM; Guiraldo RD; Berger SB; Correr AB; Correr-Sobrinho L; Contreras EF; Lopes MB
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2015 Mar; 147(3):324-9. PubMed ID: 25726399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The effect of hydrofluoric acid surface treatment and bond strength of a zirconia veneering ceramic.
    Chaiyabutr Y; McGowan S; Phillips KM; Kois JC; Giordano RA
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Sep; 100(3):194-202. PubMed ID: 18762031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effect of a desensitizing paste containing 8% arginine and calcium carbonate on the surface roughness of dental materials and human dental enamel.
    Garcia-Godoy F; Garcia-Godoy A; Garcia-Godoy C
    Am J Dent; 2009 Mar; 22 Spec No A():21A-24A. PubMed ID: 19472558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effects of various debonding and adhesive clearance methods on enamel surface: an in vitro study.
    Fan XC; Chen L; Huang XF
    BMC Oral Health; 2017 Feb; 17(1):58. PubMed ID: 28241812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Surface roughness and wettability of enamel and dentine surfaces prepared with different dental burs.
    Al-Omari WM; Mitchell CA; Cunningham JL
    J Oral Rehabil; 2001 Jul; 28(7):645-50. PubMed ID: 11422697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. SEM and profilometric evaluation of enamel surface after air rotor stripping--an in vitro study.
    Mikulewicz M; Szymkowski J; Matthews-Brzozowska T
    Acta Bioeng Biomech; 2007; 9(1):11-7. PubMed ID: 17933100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparative evaluation of enamel surface roughness after debonding using four finishing and polishing systems for residual resin removal-an in vitro study.
    Shah P; Sharma P; Goje SK; Kanzariya N; Parikh M
    Prog Orthod; 2019 May; 20(1):18. PubMed ID: 31056715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Enamel surface roughness analysis after laser ablation and acid-etching.
    Arcoria CJ; Lippas MG; Vitasek BA
    J Oral Rehabil; 1993 Mar; 20(2):213-24. PubMed ID: 8468631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. An in vitro comparison of the effects of various air polishing powders on enamel and selected esthetic restorative materials.
    Barnes CM; Covey D; Watanabe H; Simetich B; Schulte JR; Chen H
    J Clin Dent; 2014; 25(4):76-87. PubMed ID: 26054183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Free-electron laser etching of dental enamel.
    Swift EJ; Edwards GS; Perdigão J; Thompson JY; Nunes MF; Ruddell DE; Negishi A
    J Dent; 2001 Jul; 29(5):347-53. PubMed ID: 11472807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effect of self-assembling peptide P11 -4 on enamel erosion: AFM and SEM studies.
    Ceci M; Mirando M; Beltrami R; Chiesa M; Colombo M; Poggio C
    Scanning; 2016 Jul; 38(4):344-51. PubMed ID: 26435410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of traditional orthodontic polishing systems with novel non-orthodontic methods for residual adhesive removal.
    Andrews J; Hagan JL; Armbruster PC; Ballard RW
    Aust Orthod J; 2016 May; 32(1):41-7. PubMed ID: 27468590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Enamel sample preparation for AFM: Influence on roughness and morphology.
    Sorozini M; Dos Reis Perez C; Rocha GM
    Microsc Res Tech; 2018 Sep; 81(9):1071-1076. PubMed ID: 30295354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Surface roughness and enamel loss with two microabrasion techniques.
    Meireles SS; Andre Dde A; Leida FL; Bocangel JS; Demarco FF
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2009 Jan; 10(1):58-65. PubMed ID: 19142257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Assessment of enamel erosion and protective effect of salivary pellicle by surface roughness analysis and scanning electron microscopy.
    Nekrashevych Y; Hannig M; Stösser L
    Oral Health Prev Dent; 2004; 2(1):5-11. PubMed ID: 15641759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Analysis of surface roughness and microleakage of fissure sealants following organic debris removal with Carisolv.
    Yamada Y; Hossain M; Shimizu Y; Kimura Y; Masuda Y; Nakamura Y; Matsumoto K
    J Dent; 2008 Feb; 36(2):130-7. PubMed ID: 18179855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Enamel surface roughness after interproximal enamel reduction with different methods in vitro].
    Zhao BJ; Wu HM
    Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue; 2011 Feb; 20(1):51-4. PubMed ID: 21451899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Randomized clinical study of alterations in the color and surface roughness of dental enamel brushed with whitening toothpaste.
    de Moraes Rego Roselino L; Tirapelli C; de Carvalho Panzeri Pires-de-Souza F
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2018 Sep; 30(5):383-389. PubMed ID: 29603865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Surface roughness and bond strength of enamel to composite.
    Jung M; Wehlen LO; Klimek J
    Dent Mater; 1999 Jul; 15(4):250-6. PubMed ID: 10551092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.