These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

107 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31989736)

  • 21. Correlations between AFM and SEM imaging of acid-etched tooth enamel.
    Vitkov L; Kastner M; Kienberger F; Hinterdorfer P; Schilcher K; Grunert I; Dumfahrt H; Krautgartner WD
    Ultrastruct Pathol; 2008; 32(1):1-4. PubMed ID: 18300031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Morphological characteristics of primary enamel surfaces versus permanent enamel surfaces: SEM digital analysis.
    Lucchese A; Storti E
    Eur J Paediatr Dent; 2011 Sep; 12(3):179-83. PubMed ID: 22077687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Qualifying the lapped enamel surface: a profilometric, electron microscopic and microhardness study using human, bovine and ovine enamel.
    Field JC; German MJ; Waterhouse PJ
    Arch Oral Biol; 2014 May; 59(5):455-60. PubMed ID: 24607636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) Methods for Dental Enamel.
    Risnes S; Saeed M; Sehic A
    Methods Mol Biol; 2019; 1922():293-308. PubMed ID: 30838585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Protective effect of fluoride varnish and fluoride gel on enamel erosion: roughness, SEM-EDS, and µ-EDXRF studies.
    Soares LE; De Carvalho Filho AC
    Microsc Res Tech; 2015 Mar; 78(3):240-8. PubMed ID: 25626779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The effect of prophylactic powders on the surface roughness of enamel.
    Fratolin MM; Bianco VC; Santos MJ; Rizkalla AS; Santos GC
    Compend Contin Educ Dent; 2014 Oct; 35(9):e31-5. PubMed ID: 25612331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Longitudinal micromorphological 15-year results of posterior composite restorations using three-dimensional scanning electron microscopy.
    Dietz W; Montag R; Kraft U; Walther M; Sigusch BW; Gaengler P
    J Dent; 2014 Aug; 42(8):959-69. PubMed ID: 24814136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Basic study of morphological changes and surface roughness of cavities prepared by TEA CO2 laser irradiation.
    Nakamura Y; Hossain M; Yamada Y; Masuda YM; Jayawardena JA; Matsumoto K
    Photomed Laser Surg; 2006 Aug; 24(4):503-7. PubMed ID: 16942432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Wear Characteristics and Volume Loss of CAD/CAM Ceramic Materials.
    Zurek AD; Alfaro MF; Wee AG; Yuan JC; Barao VA; Mathew MT; Sukotjo C
    J Prosthodont; 2019 Feb; 28(2):e510-e518. PubMed ID: 29508487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. A comparison of surface roughness and composite/enamel bond strength of human enamel following the application of the Nd:YAG laser and etching with phosphoric acid.
    Ariyaratnam MT; Wilson MA; Mackie IC; Blinkhorn AS
    Dent Mater; 1997 Jan; 13(1):51-5. PubMed ID: 9467323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Outline and arrangement of enamel rods in human deciduous and permanent enamel. 3D-reconstructions obtained from CLSM and SEM images based on serial ground sections.
    Radlanski RJ; Renz H; Willersinn U; Cordis CA; Duschner H
    Eur J Oral Sci; 2001 Dec; 109(6):409-14. PubMed ID: 11767278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Use of the Er,Cr:YSGG laser for removing remnant adhesive from the enamel surface in rebonding of orthodontic brackets.
    Koide K; Tanaka S; Endo T
    Odontology; 2020 Apr; 108(2):271-279. PubMed ID: 31452004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The surface roughness of enamel-to-enamel contact areas compared with the intrinsic roughness of dental resin composites.
    Willems G; Lambrechts P; Braem M; Vuylsteke-Wauters M; Vanherle G
    J Dent Res; 1991 Sep; 70(9):1299-305. PubMed ID: 1918580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Optical profilometric study of changes in surface roughness of enamel during in vitro demineralization.
    Zhang XZ; Anderson P; Dowker SE; Elliott JC
    Caries Res; 2000; 34(2):164-74. PubMed ID: 10773635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Remineralizing efficacy of different calcium-phosphate and fluoride based delivery vehicles on artificial caries like enamel lesions.
    Elkassas D; Arafa A
    J Dent; 2014 Apr; 42(4):466-74. PubMed ID: 24412586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Peroxide bleaching agent effects on enamel surface microhardness, roughness and morphology.
    Pinto CF; Oliveira Rd; Cavalli V; Giannini M
    Braz Oral Res; 2004; 18(4):306-11. PubMed ID: 16089261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Influence of standard load micro- and nanopatterned in surface roughness of bleached teeth and submitted to different surface treatments.
    Nacanichi Rdo A; Tonetto MR; Bandéca MC; Andrade MF; Martins Segalla JC; Silva MB; Bhandi SH; Miranda Pedro FL; Elossais AA
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2015 Mar; 16(3):167-71. PubMed ID: 26057912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Enamel roughness after air-powder polishing.
    Gerbo LR; Lacefield WR; Barnes CM; Russell CM
    Am J Dent; 1993 Apr; 6(2):96-8. PubMed ID: 8397992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Effect of Simulated Mastication on the Surface Roughness and Wear of Machinable Ceramics and Opposing Dental Enamel.
    Daryakenari G; Alaghehmand H; Bijani A
    Oper Dent; 2019; 44(1):88-95. PubMed ID: 30142040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The Evaluation of Color and Surface Roughness Changes in Resin based Restorative Materials with Different Contents After Waiting in Various Liquids: An SEM and AFM study.
    Guler S; Unal M
    Microsc Res Tech; 2018 Dec; 81(12):1422-1433. PubMed ID: 30295386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.