225 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31990268)
1. Recall and Outcome of Screen-detected Microcalcifications during 2 Decades of Mammography Screening in the Netherlands National Breast Screening Program.
Luiten JD; Voogd AC; Luiten EJT; Broeders MJM; Roes KCB; Tjan-Heijnen VCG; Duijm LEM
Radiology; 2020 Mar; 294(3):528-537. PubMed ID: 31990268
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Screening outcome and surgical treatment during and after the transition from screen-film to digital screening mammography in the south of The Netherlands.
Weber RJ; Nederend J; Voogd AC; Strobbe LJ; Duijm LE
Int J Cancer; 2015 Jul; 137(1):135-43. PubMed ID: 25418512
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Screening outcome in women repeatedly recalled for the same mammographic abnormality before, during and after the transition from screen-film to full-field digital screening mammography.
van Bommel R; Voogd AC; Louwman MW; Strobbe LJ; Venderink D; Duijm LE
Eur Radiol; 2017 Feb; 27(2):553-561. PubMed ID: 27180183
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Trends in incidence and tumour grade in screen-detected ductal carcinoma in situ and invasive breast cancer.
Luiten JD; Voogd AC; Luiten EJT; Duijm LEM
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2017 Nov; 166(1):307-314. PubMed ID: 28748346
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Mammographic performance in a population-based screening program: before, during, and after the transition from screen-film to full-field digital mammography.
Hofvind S; Skaane P; Elmore JG; Sebuødegård S; Hoff SR; Lee CI
Radiology; 2014 Jul; 272(1):52-62. PubMed ID: 24689858
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Digital mammography in a screening programme and its implications for pathology: a comparative study.
Feeley L; Kiernan D; Mooney T; Flanagan F; Hargaden G; Kell M; Stokes M; Kennedy M
J Clin Pathol; 2011 Mar; 64(3):215-9. PubMed ID: 21177749
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Re-attendance at biennial screening mammography following a repeated false positive recall.
Klompenhouwer EG; Duijm LE; Voogd AC; den Heeten GJ; Strobbe LJ; Louwman MW; Coebergh JW; Venderink D; Broeders MJ
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2014 Jun; 145(2):429-37. PubMed ID: 24748569
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Nation-wide data on screening performance during the transition to digital mammography: observations in 6 million screens.
van Luijt PA; Fracheboud J; Heijnsdijk EA; den Heeten GJ; de Koning HJ;
Eur J Cancer; 2013 Nov; 49(16):3517-25. PubMed ID: 23871248
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Impact of the transition from screen-film to digital screening mammography on interval cancer characteristics and treatment - a population based study from the Netherlands.
Nederend J; Duijm LE; Louwman MW; Coebergh JW; Roumen RM; Lohle PN; Roukema JA; Rutten MJ; van Steenbergen LN; Ernst MF; Jansen FH; Plaisier ML; Hooijen MJ; Voogd AC
Eur J Cancer; 2014 Jan; 50(1):31-9. PubMed ID: 24275518
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Breast cancer screening results 5 years after introduction of digital mammography in a population-based screening program.
Karssemeijer N; Bluekens AM; Beijerinck D; Deurenberg JJ; Beekman M; Visser R; van Engen R; Bartels-Kortland A; Broeders MJ
Radiology; 2009 Nov; 253(2):353-8. PubMed ID: 19703851
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The impact of digital mammography on screening a young cohort of women for breast cancer in an urban specialist breast unit.
Perry NM; Patani N; Milner SE; Pinker K; Mokbel K; Allgood PC; Duffy SW
Eur Radiol; 2011 Apr; 21(4):676-82. PubMed ID: 20886340
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Follow-up and final results of the Oslo I Study comparing screen-film mammography and full-field digital mammography with soft-copy reading.
Skaane P; Skjennald A; Young K; Egge E; Jebsen I; Sager EM; Scheel B; Søvik E; Ertzaas AK; Hofvind S; Abdelnoor M
Acta Radiol; 2005 Nov; 46(7):679-89. PubMed ID: 16372686
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Digital vs screen-film mammography in population-based breast cancer screening: performance indicators and tumour characteristics of screen-detected and interval cancers.
de Munck L; de Bock GH; Otter R; Reiding D; Broeders MJ; Willemse PH; Siesling S
Br J Cancer; 2016 Aug; 115(5):517-24. PubMed ID: 27490807
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of screen-film and full-field digital mammography in Japanese population-based screening.
Yamada T; Saito M; Ishibashi T; Tsuboi M; Matsuhashi T; Sato A; Saito H; Takahashi S; Onuki K; Ouchi N
Radiat Med; 2004; 22(6):408-12. PubMed ID: 15648457
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Screen-film mammography versus full-field digital mammography in a population-based screening program: The Sogn and Fjordane study.
Juel IM; Skaane P; Hoff SR; Johannessen G; Hofvind S
Acta Radiol; 2010 Nov; 51(9):962-8. PubMed ID: 20942729
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Impact of full-field digital mammography on pre-operative diagnosis and surgical treatment of mammographic microcalcification.
Bundred SM; Zhou J; Whiteside S; Morris J; Wilson M; Hurley E; Bundred N
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2014 Jan; 143(2):359-66. PubMed ID: 24318468
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Full-field digital mammography compared to screen film mammography in the prevalent round of a population-based screening programme: the Vestfold County Study.
Vigeland E; Klaasen H; Klingen TA; Hofvind S; Skaane P
Eur Radiol; 2008 Jan; 18(1):183-91. PubMed ID: 17680246
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Breast cancer: missed interval and screening-detected cancer at full-field digital mammography and screen-film mammography-- results from a retrospective review.
Hoff SR; Abrahamsen AL; Samset JH; Vigeland E; Klepp O; Hofvind S
Radiology; 2012 Aug; 264(2):378-86. PubMed ID: 22700555
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Microcalcifications Detected at Screening Mammography: Synthetic Mammography and Digital Breast Tomosynthesis versus Digital Mammography.
Lai YC; Ray KM; Lee AY; Hayward JH; Freimanis RI; Lobach IV; Joe BN
Radiology; 2018 Dec; 289(3):630-638. PubMed ID: 30277445
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Impact of full field digital mammography on the classification and mammographic characteristics of interval breast cancers.
Knox M; O'Brien A; Szabó E; Smith CS; Fenlon HM; McNicholas MM; Flanagan FL
Eur J Radiol; 2015 Jun; 84(6):1056-61. PubMed ID: 25816990
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
