198 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31992295)
1. Exploring young women's reasons for adopting intrauterine or oral emergency contraception in the United States: a qualitative study.
Kaller S; Mays A; Freedman L; Harper CC; Biggs MA
BMC Womens Health; 2020 Jan; 20(1):15. PubMed ID: 31992295
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Preference for and efficacy of oral levonorgestrel for emergency contraception with concomitant placement of a levonorgestrel IUD: a prospective cohort study.
Turok DK; Sanders JN; Thompson IS; Royer PA; Eggebroten J; Gawron LM
Contraception; 2016 Jun; 93(6):526-32. PubMed ID: 26944863
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Progestin intrauterine devices versus copper intrauterine devices for emergency contraception.
Ramanadhan S; Goldstuck N; Henderson JT; Che Y; Cleland K; Dodge LE; Edelman A
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2023 Feb; 2(2):CD013744. PubMed ID: 36847591
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Use of effective contraception 6 months after emergency contraception with a copper intrauterine device or ulipristal acetate - a prospective observational cohort study.
Envall N; Groes Kofoed N; Kopp-Kallner H
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2016 Aug; 95(8):887-93. PubMed ID: 27109900
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Knowledge of and Interest in the Copper Intrauterine Device Among Women Seeking Emergency Contraception.
Edwards C; Panjwani D; Pendrith C; Ly A; Dunn S
J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2018 Jan; 40(1):41-47. PubMed ID: 28780215
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Experiences of Advanced Practitioners with Inserting the Copper Intrauterine Device as Emergency Contraception.
Wright RL; Frost CJ; Turok DK
Womens Health Issues; 2016; 26(5):523-8. PubMed ID: 27264913
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Copper T380 intrauterine device for emergency contraception: highly effective at any time in the menstrual cycle.
Turok DK; Godfrey EM; Wojdyla D; Dermish A; Torres L; Wu SC
Hum Reprod; 2013 Oct; 28(10):2672-6. PubMed ID: 23945595
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A qualitative exploration of emergency contraception users' willingness to select the copper IUD.
Wright RL; Frost CJ; Turok DK
Contraception; 2012 Jan; 85(1):32-5. PubMed ID: 22067808
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Young Women's Perspectives About the Contraceptive Counseling Received During Their Emergency Contraception Visit.
Biggs MA; Kimport K; Mays A; Kaller S; Berglas NF
Womens Health Issues; 2019; 29(2):170-175. PubMed ID: 30890252
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Emergency contraception with a copper IUD or oral levonorgestrel: an observational study of 1-year pregnancy rates.
Turok DK; Jacobson JC; Dermish AI; Simonsen SE; Gurtcheff S; McFadden M; Murphy PA
Contraception; 2014 Mar; 89(3):222-8. PubMed ID: 24332433
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. "It's Worked Well for Me": Young Women's Reasons for Choosing Lower-Efficacy Contraceptive Methods.
Berglas NF; Kimport K; Mays A; Kaller S; Biggs MA
J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol; 2021 Jun; 34(3):341-347. PubMed ID: 33359316
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. What are the prospects for the hormonal IUD in the public sector? A mixed-method study of the user population in Zambia.
Brunie A; Lydon M; Stankevitz K; Chintu N; Brennan C; Danna K; Rademacher KH
BMC Womens Health; 2022 May; 22(1):178. PubMed ID: 35570281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Emergency contraception: a review.
Corbelli J; Bimla Schwarz E
Minerva Ginecol; 2014 Dec; 66(6):551-64. PubMed ID: 25313947
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Access to the copper IUD as post-coital contraception: results from a mystery caller study.
Schubert FD; Bishop ES; Gold M
Contraception; 2016 Nov; 94(5):561-566. PubMed ID: 27374737
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Routine counseling about intrauterine contraception for women seeking emergency contraception.
Schwarz EB; Papic M; Parisi SM; Baldauf E; Rapkin R; Updike G
Contraception; 2014 Jul; 90(1):66-71. PubMed ID: 24674042
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Adolescent Experiences With Intrauterine Devices: A Qualitative Study.
Schmidt EO; James A; Curran KM; Peipert JF; Madden T
J Adolesc Health; 2015 Oct; 57(4):381-6. PubMed ID: 26126950
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Canadian Contraception Consensus (Part 2 of 4).
Black A; Guilbert E; ; Costescu D; Dunn S; Fisher W; Kives S; Mirosh M; Norman WV; Pymar H; Reid R; Roy G; Varto H; Waddington A; Wagner MS; Whelan AM; ; Ferguson C; Fortin C; Kielly M; Mansouri S; Todd N
J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2015 Nov; 37(11):1033-9. PubMed ID: 26629725
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Canadian Contraception Consensus (Part 1 of 4).
Black A; Guilbert E; ; Costescu D; Dunn S; Fisher W; Kives S; Mirosh M; Norman WV; Pymar H; Reid R; Roy G; Varto H; Waddington A; Wagner MS; Whelan AM; ; Ferguson C; Fortin C; Kielly M; Mansouri S; Todd N;
J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2015 Oct; 37(10):936-42. PubMed ID: 26606712
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. IUD most effective post-coital contraception.
Contracept Technol Update; 1995 Jun; 16(6):78-80. PubMed ID: 12292271
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Oral and IUD emergency contraception provision among a national sample of obstetrician-gynecologists.
Castleberry NM; Stark L; Schulkin J; Grossman D
Contraception; 2020 Dec; 102(6):406-408. PubMed ID: 32898546
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
