BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

138 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3199380)

  • 1. LH receptor induction and ovulation rate in mice selected for litter size and body weight.
    Pomp D; Eisen EJ; Ziecik AJ
    J Reprod Fertil; 1988 Nov; 84(2):601-9. PubMed ID: 3199380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Genetic variation in spontaneous ovulation rate and LH receptor induction in mice.
    Spearow JL; Bradford GE
    J Reprod Fertil; 1983 Nov; 69(2):529-37. PubMed ID: 6313917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Ovulation rate, embryo survival and ovarian sensitivity to gonadotrophins in mice selected for litter size and body weight.
    Durrant BS; Eisen EJ; Ulberg LC
    J Reprod Fertil; 1980 Jul; 59(2):329-39. PubMed ID: 6776271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effect of selection for litter size and body weight on hormone-induced ovulation rate in mice.
    Lubritz DL; Eisen EJ; Robison OW
    J Anim Sci; 1991 Nov; 69(11):4299-305. PubMed ID: 1752806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Components of litter size in mice after 110 generations of selection.
    Holt M; Vangen O; Farstad W
    Reproduction; 2004 May; 127(5):587-92. PubMed ID: 15129014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Increased litter size in Rambouillet sheep: II. Expected responses from alternative selection criteria.
    Waldron DF; Thomas DL
    J Anim Sci; 1992 Nov; 70(11):3345-50. PubMed ID: 1459895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Correlated responses for litter traits to six generations of selection for ovulation rate or prenatal survival in French Large White pigs.
    Rosendo A; Druet T; Gogué J; Canario L; Bidanel JP
    J Anim Sci; 2007 Jul; 85(7):1615-24. PubMed ID: 17371794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Direct responses to selection for increased litter size, decreased age at puberty, or random selection following selection for ovulation rate in swine.
    Lamberson WR; Johnson RK; Zimmerman DR; Long TE
    J Anim Sci; 1991 Aug; 69(8):3129-43. PubMed ID: 1894548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Reproductive performance in a diallel cross among lines of mice selected for litter size and body weight.
    Hörstgen-Schwark G; Eisen EJ; Saxton AM; Bandy TR
    J Anim Sci; 1984 Apr; 58(4):846-62. PubMed ID: 6539325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Increased litter size in Rambouillet sheep: I. Estimation of genetic parameters.
    Waldron DF; Thomas DL
    J Anim Sci; 1992 Nov; 70(11):3333-44. PubMed ID: 1459894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Direct and correlated responses to two-stage selection for ovulation rate and number of fully formed pigs at birth in swine.
    Ruíz-Flores A; Johnson RK
    J Anim Sci; 2001 Sep; 79(9):2286-97. PubMed ID: 11583415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Direct responses in males and correlated responses for reproduction in females to selection for testicular size adjusted for body weight in young male lambs.
    Haley CS; Lee GJ; Ritchie M; Land RB
    J Reprod Fertil; 1990 Jul; 89(2):383-96. PubMed ID: 2401970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Genetic and maternal environmental factors influencing litter size and reproductive efficiency in mice.
    Eisen EJ; Durrant BS
    J Anim Sci; 1980 Mar; 50(3):428-41. PubMed ID: 7364679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Incidence of splayleg pigs in Nebraska litter size selection lines.
    Holl JW; Johnson RK
    J Anim Sci; 2005 Jan; 83(1):34-40. PubMed ID: 15583040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Selection for ovulation rate in rabbits: genetic parameters, direct response, and correlated response on litter size.
    Laborda P; Mocé ML; Santacreu MA; Blasco A
    J Anim Sci; 2011 Oct; 89(10):2981-7. PubMed ID: 21622874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Differences in pup birth weight, pup variability within litters, and dam weight of mice selected for alternative criteria to increase litter size.
    van Engelen MA; Nielsen MK; Ribeiro EL
    J Anim Sci; 1995 Jul; 73(7):1948-53. PubMed ID: 7592078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Genetic implications of a bivariate threshold model for litter size components.
    Pérez-Enciso M; Foulley JL; Bodin L; Poivey JP
    J Anim Sci; 1994 Nov; 72(11):2775-86. PubMed ID: 7730169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Alternative methods of selection for litter size in mice: II. Response to thirteen generations of selection.
    Gion JM; Clutter AC; Nielsen MK
    J Anim Sci; 1990 Nov; 68(11):3543-56. PubMed ID: 2262407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of plasma FSH concentration in boars and gilts from lines selected for ovulation rate and embryonal survival, and litter size and estimation of (co)variance components for FSH and ovulation rate.
    Cassady JP; Johnson RK; Ford JJ
    J Anim Sci; 2000 Jun; 78(6):1430-5. PubMed ID: 10875623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Genetic variation in reproductive responses to a high-energy diet in mice.
    Pomp D; Eisen EJ
    J Anim Sci; 1991 May; 69(5):1875-84. PubMed ID: 2066298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.