These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
456 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31993834)
21. Impact of anatomical and functional severity of coronary atherosclerotic plaques on the transmural perfusion gradient: a [15O]H2O PET study. Danad I; Raijmakers PG; Harms HJ; Heymans MW; van Royen N; Lubberink M; Boellaard R; van Rossum AC; Lammertsma AA; Knaapen P Eur Heart J; 2014 Aug; 35(31):2094-105. PubMed ID: 24780500 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Diagnostic value of longitudinal flow gradient for the presence of haemodynamically significant coronary artery disease. Bom MJ; Driessen RS; Raijmakers PG; Everaars H; Lammertsma AA; van Rossum AC; van Royen N; Knuuti J; Mäki M; Danad I; Knaapen P Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2019 Jan; 20(1):21-30. PubMed ID: 30212851 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Quantification of myocardial blood flow by adenosine-stress CT perfusion imaging in pigs during various degrees of stenosis correlates well with coronary artery blood flow and fractional flow reserve. Rossi A; Uitterdijk A; Dijkshoorn M; Klotz E; Dharampal A; van Straten M; van der Giessen WJ; Mollet N; van Geuns RJ; Krestin GP; Duncker DJ; de Feyter PJ; Merkus D Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2013 Apr; 14(4):331-8. PubMed ID: 22843541 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Impact of Revascularization on Absolute Myocardial Blood Flow as Assessed by Serial [ Driessen RS; Danad I; Stuijfzand WJ; Schumacher SP; Knuuti J; Mäki M; Lammertsma AA; van Rossum AC; van Royen N; Raijmakers PG; Knaapen P Circ Cardiovasc Imaging; 2018 May; 11(5):e007417. PubMed ID: 29703779 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Exploring Coronary Circulatory Response to Stenosis and Its Association With Invasive Physiologic Indexes Using Absolute Myocardial Blood Flow and Coronary Pressure. Lee JM; Hwang D; Park J; Zhang J; Tong Y; Kim CH; Bang JI; Suh M; Paeng JC; Cheon GJ; Koo BK Circulation; 2017 Nov; 136(19):1798-1808. PubMed ID: 28851731 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Clinical relevance of PET myocardial blood flow quantification. Leccisotti L; Lavalle M; Giordano A Q J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2016 Dec; 60(4):338-53. PubMed ID: 27611710 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Enhanced diagnostic utility achieved by myocardial blood analysis: A meta-analysis of noninvasive cardiac imaging in the detection of functional coronary artery disease. Dai N; Zhang X; Zhang Y; Hou L; Li W; Fan B; Zhang T; Xu Y Int J Cardiol; 2016 Oct; 221():665-73. PubMed ID: 27423088 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Quantitative Assessment of Coronary Microvascular Function: Dynamic Single-Photon Emission Computed Tomography, Positron Emission Tomography, Ultrasound, Computed Tomography, and Magnetic Resonance Imaging. Feher A; Sinusas AJ Circ Cardiovasc Imaging; 2017 Aug; 10(8):. PubMed ID: 28794138 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Myocardial perfusion imaging with PET. Driessen RS; Raijmakers PG; Stuijfzand WJ; Knaapen P Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2017 Jul; 33(7):1021-1031. PubMed ID: 28188475 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Assessment of myocardial blood flow and coronary flow reserve with positron emission tomography in ischemic heart disease: current state and future directions. Al Badarin F; Aljizeeri A; Almasoudi F; Al-Mallah MH Heart Fail Rev; 2017 Jul; 22(4):441-453. PubMed ID: 28593557 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Stable microvascular angina: instrumental evaluation of coronary microvascular dysfunction with coronary angiography and myocardial scintigraphy. Sucato V; Evola S; Novo G; Bronte E; Novo S Int J Cardiol; 2014 Feb; 171(3):e127-8. PubMed ID: 24433618 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. PET-Based Imaging of Ischemic Heart Disease. Chen K; Miller EJ; Sadeghi MM PET Clin; 2019 Apr; 14(2):211-221. PubMed ID: 30826019 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. The role of resting myocardial blood flow and myocardial blood flow reserve as a predictor of major adverse cardiovascular outcomes. Guerraty MA; Rao HS; Anjan VY; Szapary H; Mankoff DA; Pryma DA; Rader DJ; Dubroff JG PLoS One; 2020; 15(2):e0228931. PubMed ID: 32053688 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Transthoracic Doppler echocardiography compared with positron emission tomography for assessment of coronary microvascular dysfunction: The iPOWER study. Michelsen MM; Mygind ND; Pena A; Olsen RH; Christensen TE; Ghotbi AA; Hasbak P; Kjaer A; Gustafsson I; Hansen PR; Hansen HS; Høst N; Kastrup J; Prescott E Int J Cardiol; 2017 Feb; 228():435-443. PubMed ID: 27870973 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Invasive evaluation of patients with angina in the absence of obstructive coronary artery disease. Lee BK; Lim HS; Fearon WF; Yong AS; Yamada R; Tanaka S; Lee DP; Yeung AC; Tremmel JA Circulation; 2015 Mar; 131(12):1054-60. PubMed ID: 25712205 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]