BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

244 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31994534)

  • 1. Treatment of noncarious cervical lesions: when, why, and how.
    Peumans M; Politano G; Van Meerbeek B
    Int J Esthet Dent; 2020; 15(1):16-42. PubMed ID: 31994534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Noncarious cervical lesions: Morphology and progression, prevalence, etiology, pathophysiology, and clinical guidelines for restoration.
    Goodacre CJ; Eugene Roberts W; Munoz CA
    J Prosthodont; 2023 Feb; 32(2):e1-e18. PubMed ID: 35920595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of pattern of failure of resin composite restorations in non-carious cervical lesions with and without occlusal wear facets.
    Oginni AO; Adeleke AA
    J Dent; 2014 Jul; 42(7):824-30. PubMed ID: 24746714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Abfraction lesions: etiology, diagnosis, and treatment options.
    Nascimento MM; Dilbone DA; Pereira PN; Duarte WR; Geraldeli S; Delgado AJ
    Clin Cosmet Investig Dent; 2016; 8():79-87. PubMed ID: 27217799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Analysis of etiological factors involved in noncarious cervical lesions].
    Tomasik M
    Ann Acad Med Stetin; 2006; 52(3):125-36. PubMed ID: 17385359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Abfraction, abrasion, biocorrosion, and the enigma of noncarious cervical lesions: a 20-year perspective.
    Grippo JO; Simring M; Coleman TA
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2012 Feb; 24(1):10-23. PubMed ID: 22296690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Influence of adhesive strategy on clinical parameters in cervical restorations: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Schroeder M; Correa IC; Bauer J; Loguercio AD; Reis A
    J Dent; 2017 Jul; 62():36-53. PubMed ID: 28495559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A three-year clinical evaluation of two-bottle versus one-bottle dentin adhesives.
    Aw TC; Lepe X; Johnson GH; Mancl LA
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2005 Mar; 136(3):311-22. PubMed ID: 15819344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. An 18-month clinical evaluation of three different universal adhesives used with a universal flowable composite resin in the restoration of non-carious cervical lesions.
    Oz FD; Kutuk ZB; Ozturk C; Soleimani R; Gurgan S
    Clin Oral Investig; 2019 Mar; 23(3):1443-1452. PubMed ID: 30109443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Gingival recession associated with noncarious cervical lesions: combined periodontal-restorative approach and the treatment of long-term esthetic complications.
    Santamaria MP; Saito MT; Casati MZ; Nociti Junior FH; Sallum AW; Sallum EA
    Gen Dent; 2012; 60(4):306-11. PubMed ID: 22782042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Influence of cavity depth and restoration of non-carious cervical root lesions on strain distribution from various loading sites.
    Du JK; Wu JH; Chen PH; Ho PS; Chen KK
    BMC Oral Health; 2020 Apr; 20(1):98. PubMed ID: 32264864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effect of dentin roughness on the adhesive performance in non-carious cervical lesions: A double-blind randomized clinical trial.
    Loguercio AD; Luque-Martinez IV; Fuentes S; Reis A; Muñoz MA
    J Dent; 2018 Feb; 69():60-69. PubMed ID: 28962842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A survey of management strategies for noncarious cervical lesions.
    Estafan A; Bartlett D; Goldstein G
    Int J Prosthodont; 2014; 27(1):87-90. PubMed ID: 24392484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The clinical effectiveness of various adhesive systems: an 18-month evaluation.
    Moosavi H; Kimyai S; Forghani M; Khodadadi R
    Oper Dent; 2013; 38(2):134-41. PubMed ID: 22917442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Factors influencing the progression of noncarious cervical lesions: A 5-year prospective clinical evaluation.
    Sawlani K; Lawson NC; Burgess JO; Lemons JE; Kinderknecht KE; Givan DA; Ramp L
    J Prosthet Dent; 2016 May; 115(5):571-7. PubMed ID: 26774320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Influence of Surface Treatment on Composite Adhesion in Noncarious Cervical Lesions: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
    Rocha AC; Da Rosa W; Cocco AR; Da Silva AF; Piva E; Lund RG
    Oper Dent; 2018; 43(5):508-519. PubMed ID: 29570026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Stress-strain Analysis of Premolars With Non-carious Cervical Lesions: Influence of Restorative Material, Loading Direction and Mechanical Fatigue.
    Machado AC; Soares CJ; Reis BR; Bicalho AA; Raposo L; Soares PV
    Oper Dent; 2017; 42(3):253-265. PubMed ID: 28467256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Characteristics of noncarious cervical lesions: a clinical investigation.
    Aw TC; Lepe X; Johnson GH; Mancl L
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2002 Jun; 133(6):725-33. PubMed ID: 12083648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effect of Oxalic Acid-Based Desensitizing Agent on Cervical Restorations on Hypersensitive Teeth: A Triple-Blind Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial.
    Corral C; Grez PV; Letelier M; Dos Campos EA; Dourado AL; Fernández GE
    J Oral Facial Pain Headache; 2016 Fall; 30(4):330-337. PubMed ID: 27792801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Two-year clinical performance of Clearfil SE and Clearfil S3 in restoration of unabraded non-carious class V lesions.
    Brackett MG; Dib A; Franco G; Estrada BE; Brackett WW
    Oper Dent; 2010; 35(3):273-8. PubMed ID: 20533626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.