These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
310 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31994598)
1. Does low-cost GIC have the same survival rate as high-viscosity GIC in atraumatic restorative treatments? A RCT. Moura MS; Sousa GP; Brito MHSF; Silva MCC; Lima MDM; Moura LFAD; Lima CCB Braz Oral Res; 2020; 33():e125. PubMed ID: 31994598 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Low-cost GICs reduce survival rate in occlusal ART restorations in primary molars after one year: A RCT. Olegário IC; Pacheco AL; de Araújo MP; Ladewig NM; Bonifácio CC; Imparato JC; Raggio DP J Dent; 2017 Feb; 57():45-50. PubMed ID: 27956016 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Atraumatic restorative treatment versus conventional restorative treatment for managing dental caries. Dorri M; Martinez-Zapata MJ; Walsh T; Marinho VC; Sheiham Deceased A; Zaror C Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2017 Dec; 12(12):CD008072. PubMed ID: 29284075 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Glass carbomer and compomer for ART restorations: 3-year results of a randomized clinical trial. Olegário IC; Hesse D; Mendes FM; Bonifácio CC; Raggio DP Clin Oral Investig; 2019 Apr; 23(4):1761-1770. PubMed ID: 30171345 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. 2-year survival and cost analysis of occlusoproximal ART restorations using encapsulated glass ionomer cement in primary molars: a randomized controlled trial. Garbim JR; Saihara CS; Olegário IC; Hesse D; Araujo MP; Bonifácio CC; Braga MM; Raggio DP BMC Oral Health; 2024 Jun; 24(1):647. PubMed ID: 38824540 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Survival rate of primary molar restorations is not influenced by hand mixed or encapsulated GIC: 24 months RCT. Oliveira RC; Camargo LB; Novaes TF; Pontes LRA; Olegário IC; Gimenez T; Pássaro AL; Tedesco TK; Braga MM; Mendes FM; Raggio DP BMC Oral Health; 2021 Jul; 21(1):371. PubMed ID: 34301217 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The effect of GIC-brand on the survival rate of proximal-ART restorations. Bonifácio CC; Hesse D; Raggio DP; Bönecker M; van Loveren C; van Amerongen WE Int J Paediatr Dent; 2013 Jul; 23(4):251-8. PubMed ID: 22891625 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Restoration of permanent teeth in young rural children in Cambodia using the atraumatic restorative treatment (ART) technique and Fuji II glass ionomer cement. Mallow PK; Durward CS; Klaipo M Int J Paediatr Dent; 1998 Mar; 8(1):35-40. PubMed ID: 9558544 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effectiveness of conventional treatment using bulk-fill composite resin versus Atraumatic Restorative Treatments in primary and permanent dentition: a pragmatic randomized clinical trial. Olegário IC; Hesse D; Bönecker M; Imparato JC; Braga MM; Mendes FM; Raggio DP BMC Oral Health; 2016 Aug; 17(1):34. PubMed ID: 27485432 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. One year Survival Rate of Ketac Molar versus Vitro Molar for Occlusoproximal ART Restorations: a RCT. Anna Luisa de Brito P; Isabel Cristina O; Clarissa Calil B; Ana Flávia Bissoto C; José Carlos Pettorossi I; Daniela Prócida R Braz Oral Res; 2017 Nov; 31():e88. PubMed ID: 29116299 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Giomer composite compared to glass ionomer in occlusoproximal ART restorations of primary molars: 24-month RCT. Pássaro AL; Olegário IC; Laux CM; Oliveira RC; Tedesco TK; Raggio DP Aust Dent J; 2022 Jun; 67(2):148-158. PubMed ID: 34904247 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Bilayer technique and nano-filled coating increase success of approximal ART restorations: a randomized clinical trial. Hesse D; Bonifácio CC; Guglielmi Cde A; Bönecker M; van Amerongen WE; Raggio DP Int J Paediatr Dent; 2016 May; 26(3):231-9. PubMed ID: 26370224 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Clinical evaluation of three caries removal approaches in primary teeth: a randomised controlled trial. Phonghanyudh A; Phantumvanit P; Songpaisan Y; Petersen PE Community Dent Health; 2012 Jun; 29(2):173-8. PubMed ID: 22779380 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of ART and conventional techniques on clinical performance of glass-ionomer cement restorations in load bearing areas of permanent and primary dentitions: A systematic review. Ruengrungsom C; Palamara JEA; Burrow MF J Dent; 2018 Nov; 78():1-21. PubMed ID: 30017937 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Two-year survival rates of proximal atraumatic restorative treatment restorations in relation to glass ionomer cements and Postrestoration meals consumed. Kemoli AM; Opinya GN; van Amerongen WE; Mwalili SM Pediatr Dent; 2011; 33(3):246-51. PubMed ID: 21703078 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A clinical evaluation of two glass ionomer cements in primary molars using atraumatic restorative treatment technique in India: 1 year follow up. Deepa G; Shobha T Int J Paediatr Dent; 2010 Nov; 20(6):410-8. PubMed ID: 20642467 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Clinical effects of glass ionomer restorations on residual carious dentin in primary molars. Smales RJ; Ngo HC; Yip KH; Yu C Am J Dent; 2005 Jun; 18(3):188-93. PubMed ID: 16158811 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Clinical performance of glass ionomer cement and composite resin in Class II restorations in primary teeth: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Dias AGA; Magno MB; Delbem ACB; Cunha RF; Maia LC; Pessan JP J Dent; 2018 Jun; 73():1-13. PubMed ID: 29649506 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]