These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

178 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31994647)

  • 1. Dental, skeletal and soft tissue effects of the Distal Jet appliance: A prospective clinical study.
    Reis RS; Henriques JFC; Janson G; Freitas KMS; Moura W
    Dental Press J Orthod; 2019; 24(6):56-64. PubMed ID: 31994647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The effectiveness of pendulum, K-loop, and distal jet distalization techniques in growing children and its effects on anchor unit: A comparative study.
    Marure PS; Patil RU; Reddy S; Prakash A; Kshetrimayum N; Shukla R
    J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 2016; 34(4):331-40. PubMed ID: 27681396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evaluation of maxillary molar distalization with the distal jet: a comparison with other contemporary methods.
    Bolla E; Muratore F; Carano A; Bowman SJ
    Angle Orthod; 2002 Oct; 72(5):481-94. PubMed ID: 12401059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Clinical application of modified distal-jet appliance in distalization of maxillary molar].
    Zhang MM; Sun TT; Liu L
    Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2007 Apr; 25(2):132-4. PubMed ID: 17663332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evaluation of the effects of the hybrid Pendulum in comparison with the conventional Pendulum appliance.
    Bozkaya E; Tortop T; Yüksel S; Kaygısız E
    Angle Orthod; 2020 Mar; 90(2):194-201. PubMed ID: 31642688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A comparison of two intraoral molar distalization appliances: distal jet versus pendulum.
    Chiu PP; McNamara JA; Franchi L
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2005 Sep; 128(3):353-65. PubMed ID: 16168332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Class II malocclusion treatment changes with the Jones jig, Distal jet and First Class appliances.
    Vilanova L; Henriques JFC; Patel MP; Reis RS; Grec RHDC; Aliaga-Del Castillo A; Bellini-Pereira SA; Janson G
    J Appl Oral Sci; 2020; 28():e20190364. PubMed ID: 32348442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Noncompliance maxillary molar distalization with the first class appliance: a randomized controlled trial.
    Papadopoulos MA; Melkos AB; Athanasiou AE
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 May; 137(5):586.e1-586.e13; discussion 586-7. PubMed ID: 20451774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Dentoalveolar and skeletal changes associated with the pendulum appliance.
    Bussick TJ; McNamara JA
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2000 Mar; 117(3):333-43. PubMed ID: 10715093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Class II malocclusion treatment effects with Jones Jig and Distal Jet followed by fixed appliances.
    Vilanova L; Henriques JFC; Janson G; Patel MP; Reis RS; Aliaga-Del Castillo A
    Angle Orthod; 2018 Jan; 88(1):10-19. PubMed ID: 28985105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Sagittal, vertical, and transverse changes consequent to maxillary molar distalization with the pendulum appliance.
    Fuziy A; Rodrigues de Almeida R; Janson G; Angelieri F; Pinzan A
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 Oct; 130(4):502-10. PubMed ID: 17045150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Maxillary molar distalization with the indirect Palatal miniscrew for Anchorage and Distalization Appliance (iPANDA).
    Suzuki EY; Suzuki B
    Orthodontics (Chic.); 2013; 14(1):e228-41. PubMed ID: 23646335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Soft tissue, skeletal and dentoalveolar changes following conventional anchorage molar distalization therapy in class II non-growing subjects: a multicentric retrospective study.
    Fontana M; Cozzani M; Caprioglio A
    Prog Orthod; 2012 May; 13(1):30-41. PubMed ID: 22583585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evaluation of an intraoral maxillary molar distalization technique.
    Ghosh J; Nanda RS
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1996 Dec; 110(6):639-46. PubMed ID: 8972811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Molar distalization with a pendulum appliance K-loop combination.
    Acar AG; Gürsoy S; Dinçer M
    Eur J Orthod; 2010 Aug; 32(4):459-65. PubMed ID: 20231213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effects of molar distalization with the fast back appliance.
    Alkasaby AA; Abdelnaby YL; Hammad SM
    Int J Orthod Milwaukee; 2013; 24(4):25-31. PubMed ID: 24640072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Cephalometric changes following simultaneous first and second maxillary molar distalization using a non-compliance intraoral appliance.
    Papadopoulos MA; Mavropoulos A; Karamouzos A
    J Orofac Orthop; 2004 Mar; 65(2):123-36. PubMed ID: 15206094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A new approach in maxillary molar distalization: intraoral bodily molar distalizer.
    Keles A; Sayinsu K
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2000 Jan; 117(1):39-48. PubMed ID: 10629518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effects of a segmented removable appliance in molar distalization.
    Akin E; Gurton AU; Sagdic D
    Eur J Orthod; 2006 Feb; 28(1):65-73. PubMed ID: 16436365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effects of zygoma-gear appliance for unilateral maxillary molar distalization: A prospective clinical study.
    Kilkis D; Celikoglu M; Nur M; Bayram M; Candirli C
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2016 Dec; 150(6):989-996. PubMed ID: 27894548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.