These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

212 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31994736)

  • 1. Task-switching costs have distinct phase-locked and nonphase-locked EEG power effects.
    McKewen M; Cooper PS; Wong ASW; Michie PT; Sauseng P; Karayanidis F
    Psychophysiology; 2020 May; 57(5):e13533. PubMed ID: 31994736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Brain oscillatory activity associated with switch and mixing costs during reactive control.
    Capizzi M; Ambrosini E; Arbula S; Vallesi A
    Psychophysiology; 2020 Nov; 57(11):e13642. PubMed ID: 32720385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Electrophysiological correlates of the cognitive control processes underpinning mixing and switching costs.
    Tarantino V; Mazzonetto I; Vallesi A
    Brain Res; 2016 Sep; 1646():160-173. PubMed ID: 27238463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Dissociable theta networks underlie the switch and mixing costs during task switching.
    McKewen M; Cooper PS; Skippen P; Wong ASW; Michie PT; Karayanidis F
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2021 Oct; 42(14):4643-4657. PubMed ID: 34184803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Intertrial RT variability affects level of target-related interference in cued task switching.
    Provost A; Jamadar S; Heathcote A; Brown SD; Karayanidis F
    Psychophysiology; 2018 Mar; 55(3):. PubMed ID: 28776698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Distinct neurophysiological mechanisms mediate mixing costs and switch costs.
    Wylie GR; Murray MM; Javitt DC; Foxe JJ
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2009 Jan; 21(1):105-18. PubMed ID: 18476759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The Account of the Effect of Switch Probability on Switch and Mixing Costs: An ERP Study in a Cued Task-switching Paradigm.
    Wenwen C; Yang Y; Cui L; Chen Y; Zhang W; Zhang X; Zhou S
    Cogn Behav Neurol; 2022 Dec; 35(4):230-246. PubMed ID: 36136039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Jointly modeling behavioral and EEG measures of proactive control in task switching.
    Karayanidis F; Hawkins GE; Wong ASW; Aziz F; Hunter M; Steyvers M
    Psychophysiology; 2023 Jul; 60(7):e14241. PubMed ID: 36633198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Multisubject Decomposition of Event-related Positivities in Cognitive Control: Tackling Age-related Changes in Reactive Control.
    Enriquez-Geppert S; Barceló F
    Brain Topogr; 2018 Jan; 31(1):17-34. PubMed ID: 27522402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Altered proactive control in adults with ADHD: Evidence from event-related potentials during cued task switching.
    Sidlauskaite J; Dhar M; Sonuga-Barke E; Wiersema JR
    Neuropsychologia; 2020 Feb; 138():107330. PubMed ID: 31887312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The development of anticipatory cognitive control processes in task-switching: an ERP study in children, adolescents, and young adults.
    Manzi A; Nessler D; Czernochowski D; Friedman D
    Psychophysiology; 2011 Sep; 48(9):1258-75. PubMed ID: 21371043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Task switching and bilingualism in young and older adults: A behavioral and electrophysiological investigation.
    López Zunini RA; Morrison C; Kousaie S; Taler V
    Neuropsychologia; 2019 Oct; 133():107186. PubMed ID: 31513809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Immediate versus delayed control demands elicit distinct mechanisms for instantiating proactive control.
    Janowich JR; Cavanagh JF
    Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci; 2019 Aug; 19(4):910-926. PubMed ID: 30607833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Resting theta activity is associated with specific coding levels in event-related theta activity during conflict monitoring.
    Pscherer C; Bluschke A; Prochnow A; Eggert E; Mückschel M; Beste C
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2020 Dec; 41(18):5114-5127. PubMed ID: 32822109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Investigating a method for reducing residual switch costs in cued task switching.
    Schneider DW
    Mem Cognit; 2016 Jul; 44(5):762-77. PubMed ID: 26833200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. EEG-ERP dynamics in a visual Continuous Performance Test.
    Karamacoska D; Barry RJ; De Blasio FM; Steiner GZ
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2019 Dec; 146():249-260. PubMed ID: 31648022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Switch-specific and general preparation map onto different ERP components in a task-switching paradigm.
    Karayanidis F; Provost A; Brown S; Paton B; Heathcote A
    Psychophysiology; 2011 Apr; 48(4):559-68. PubMed ID: 20718932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Auditory stimulus- and response-locked ERP components and behavior.
    Fogarty JS; Barry RJ; Steiner GZ
    Psychophysiology; 2020 May; 57(5):e13538. PubMed ID: 32010995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. An information theory account of late frontoparietal ERP positivities in cognitive control.
    Barceló F; Cooper PS
    Psychophysiology; 2018 Mar; 55(3):. PubMed ID: 28295342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Dynamic low frequency EEG phase synchronization patterns during proactive control of task switching.
    López ME; Pusil S; Pereda E; Maestú F; Barceló F
    Neuroimage; 2019 Feb; 186():70-82. PubMed ID: 30394328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.