161 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31995036)
1. Comparison of Success Rates of Cone Beam Computed Tomography in the Retrieval of Metal-Ceramic vs All-Ceramic Implant-Supported Restorations: An In Vitro Study.
Neshandar Asli H; Kajan ZD; Khosravifard N; Roudbary SN; Rafiei E
Int J Prosthodont; 2021; 34(2):192–198. PubMed ID: 31995036
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Evaluation of the success rate of cone beam computed tomography in determining the location and direction of screw access holes in cement-retained implant-supported prostheses: An in vitro study.
Neshandar Asli H; Dalili Kajan Z; Gholizade F
J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Aug; 120(2):220-224. PubMed ID: 29475756
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Fracture Resistance and Mode of Failure of Ceramic versus Titanium Implant Abutments and Single Implant-Supported Restorations.
Sghaireen MG
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2015 Jun; 17(3):554-61. PubMed ID: 24118925
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Retrospective analysis of porcelain failures of metal ceramic crowns and fixed partial dentures supported by 729 implants in 152 patients: patient-specific and implant-specific predictors of ceramic failure.
Kinsel RP; Lin D
J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Jun; 101(6):388-94. PubMed ID: 19463666
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A 3-year prospective study of implant-supported, single-tooth restorations of all-ceramic and metal-ceramic materials in patients with tooth agenesis.
Hosseini M; Worsaae N; Schiødt M; Gotfredsen K
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2013 Oct; 24(10):1078-87. PubMed ID: 22708959
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A comparison of the porcelain fracture resistance of screw-retained and cement-retained implant-supported metal-ceramic crowns.
Torrado E; Ercoli C; Al Mardini M; Graser GN; Tallents RH; Cordaro L
J Prosthet Dent; 2004 Jun; 91(6):532-7. PubMed ID: 15211294
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A conservative approach to localize loose implant screw through cemented crown: an in vitro experimental study.
Saeed KMM; Al-Zahawi AR
BMC Oral Health; 2024 May; 24(1):617. PubMed ID: 38807096
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Fracture mode during cyclic loading of implant-supported single-tooth restorations.
Hosseini M; Kleven E; Gotfredsen K
J Prosthet Dent; 2012 Aug; 108(2):74-83. PubMed ID: 22867804
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Strength and mode of failure of single implant all-ceramic abutment restorations under static load.
Tripodakis AP; Strub JR; Kappert HF; Witkowski S
Int J Prosthodont; 1995; 8(3):265-72. PubMed ID: 10348596
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A study on the fracture strength of implant-supported restorations using milled ceramic abutments and all-ceramic crowns.
Cho HW; Dong JK; Jin TH; Oh SC; Lee HH; Lee JW
Int J Prosthodont; 2002; 15(1):9-13. PubMed ID: 11887605
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Porcelain fracture resistance of screw-retained, cement-retained, and screw-cement-retained implant-supported metal ceramic posterior crowns.
Al-Omari WM; Shadid R; Abu-Naba'a L; El Masoud B
J Prosthodont; 2010 Jun; 19(4):263-73. PubMed ID: 20136704
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Zirconium dioxide based dental restorations. Studies on clinical performance and fracture behaviour.
Larsson C
Swed Dent J Suppl; 2011; (213):9-84. PubMed ID: 21919311
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A 1-year randomised controlled trial comparing zirconia versus metal-ceramic implant supported single-tooth restorations.
Hosseini M; Worsaae N; Schiodt M; Gotfredsen K
Eur J Oral Implantol; 2011; 4(4):347-61. PubMed ID: 22282731
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. In vivo fracture resistance of implant-supported all-ceramic restorations.
Yildirim M; Fischer H; Marx R; Edelhoff D
J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Oct; 90(4):325-31. PubMed ID: 14564286
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Misfit detection in implant-supported prostheses of different compositions by periapical radiography and cone beam computed tomography: An in vitro study.
de-Azevedo-Vaz SL; Araujo-Siqueira C; Carneiro VC; Oliveira ML; Azeredo RA
J Prosthet Dent; 2021 Aug; 126(2):205-213. PubMed ID: 32723499
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Fracture Resistance of Cement-retained, Screw-retained, and Combined Cement- and Screw-retained Metal-ceramic Implant-supported Molar Restorations.
Malpartida-Carrillo V; Tinedo-López PL; Ortiz-Culca F; Guerrero ME; Amaya-Pajares SP; Özcan M
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2020 Aug; 21(8):868-873. PubMed ID: 33568607
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The influence of veneering porcelain thickness of all-ceramic and metal ceramic crowns on failure resistance after cyclic loading.
Shirakura A; Lee H; Geminiani A; Ercoli C; Feng C
J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Feb; 101(2):119-27. PubMed ID: 19167536
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Implant-supported metal-ceramic and resin-modified ceramic crowns: A 5-year prospective clinical study.
Agustín-Panadero R; Soriano-Valero S; Labaig-Rueda C; Fernández-Estevan L; Solá-Ruíz MF
J Prosthet Dent; 2020 Jul; 124(1):46-52.e2. PubMed ID: 31703925
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Quantitative assessment on artifacts of dental restorative materials in cone beam computed tomography].
Yuan FS; Sun YC; Xie XY; Wang Y; Lv PJ
Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2013 Dec; 45(6):989-92. PubMed ID: 24343088
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A systematic review of the survival and complication rates of zirconia-ceramic and metal-ceramic single crowns.
Pjetursson BE; Valente NA; Strasding M; Zwahlen M; Liu S; Sailer I
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2018 Oct; 29 Suppl 16():199-214. PubMed ID: 30328190
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
