These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

124 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31995764)

  • 1. Science that Inspires.
    Cell Press Team
    Cell Rep; 2020 Jan; 30(4):947-948. PubMed ID: 31995764
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Science that Inspires.
    Cell Press Team
    Cell Chem Biol; 2020 Feb; 27(2):135-136. PubMed ID: 32084334
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Stepping down.
    Marder E
    Elife; 2020 Jan; 9():. PubMed ID: 31931957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A single, open access journal may prevent the primary publishing problems in the life sciences.
    Lewis P; Depp C
    Account Res; 2019 Aug; 26(6):391-396. PubMed ID: 30763518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Refereed journals.
    Shaughnessy AF
    J Am Board Fam Pract; 1989; 2(4):292-3. PubMed ID: 2801200
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. How does peer review work?
    Aaron L
    Radiol Technol; 2008; 79(6):553-4. PubMed ID: 18650531
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Post Publication Peer Review: Is it Coming to Your Nursing Journal?
    Pierson CA
    J Am Assoc Nurse Pract; 2016 Jun; 28(6):286. PubMed ID: 27273106
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Reference accuracy: authors', reviewers', editors', and publishers' contributions.
    Barroga EF
    J Korean Med Sci; 2014 Dec; 29(12):1587-9. PubMed ID: 25469055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Harefuah peer review].
    Shemer Y; Shoenfeld Y
    Harefuah; 2001 May; 140(5):403-5. PubMed ID: 11419062
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Article review process.
    Burr G
    Confed Aust Crit Care Nurses J; 1991 Sep; 4(3):17. PubMed ID: 1912646
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Peering into the review process.
    Nat Struct Biol; 2000 Dec; 7(12):1075-6. PubMed ID: 11101879
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The Neuroscience Peer Review Consortium.
    Eur Psychiatry; 2009 Mar; 24(2):69-70. PubMed ID: 19248983
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13.
    Barrett SCH
    Proc Biol Sci; 2020 Jan; 287(1918):20192626. PubMed ID: 31910788
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Reducing the costs of peer review.
    Nat Neurosci; 2008 Apr; 11(4):375. PubMed ID: 18368038
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Peer review: purpose, process and publication.
    Thistlethwaite J
    Clin Teach; 2012 Aug; 9(4):201-4. PubMed ID: 22783849
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Trainees in peer review: our experience.
    Castillo M
    AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 2014 Feb; 35(2):211-3. PubMed ID: 23703147
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Advancing the Rigour and Integrity of Our Science: The Registered Reports Initiative.
    Probst TM; Hagger MS
    Stress Health; 2015 Aug; 31(3):177-9. PubMed ID: 26250351
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Biologists urged to hug a preprint.
    Callaway E; Powell K
    Nature; 2016 Feb; 530(7590):265. PubMed ID: 26887471
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A new template for referees and guidance on writing high quality papers.
    Goodsitt MM; Das SK; Williamson JF
    Med Phys; 2016 Aug; 43(8):4465. PubMed ID: 27487861
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Infection control and hospital epidemiology: the formal review process.
    Hepker RR
    Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol; 1991 Jan; 12(1):11-3. PubMed ID: 1900314
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.