221 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31996014)
1. ECG criteria for the detection of high-risk cardiovascular conditions in master athletes.
Panhuyzen-Goedkoop NM; Wellens HJ; Verbeek AL; Jørstad HT; Smeets JR; Peters RJ
Eur J Prev Cardiol; 2020 Sep; 27(14):1529-1538. PubMed ID: 31996014
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Pediatric athletes' ECG and diagnostic performance of contemporary ECG interpretation criteria.
Halasz G; Cattaneo M; Piepoli M; Romano S; Biasini V; Menafoglio A; Gasperetti A; Badini M; Villa M; Dall'Ara L; Roberto M; Cassina T; Capelli B
Int J Cardiol; 2021 Jul; 335():40-46. PubMed ID: 33857542
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Accuracy of the 2017 international recommendations for clinicians who interpret adolescent athletes' ECGs: a cohort study of 11 168 British white and black soccer players.
Malhotra A; Dhutia H; Yeo TJ; Finocchiaro G; Gati S; Bulleros P; Fanton Z; Papatheodorou E; Miles C; Keteepe-Arachi T; Basu J; Parry-Williams G; Prakash K; Gray B; D'Silva A; Ensam B; Behr E; Tome M; Papadakis M; Sharma S
Br J Sports Med; 2020 Jun; 54(12):739-745. PubMed ID: 31278087
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Cost Implications of Using Different ECG Criteria for Screening Young Athletes in the United Kingdom.
Dhutia H; Malhotra A; Gabus V; Merghani A; Finocchiaro G; Millar L; Narain R; Papadakis M; Naci H; Tome M; Sharma S
J Am Coll Cardiol; 2016 Aug; 68(7):702-11. PubMed ID: 27515329
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Diagnostic accuracy and Bayesian analysis of new international ECG recommendations in paediatric athletes.
McClean G; Riding NR; Pieles G; Watt V; Adamuz C; Sharma S; George KP; Oxborough D; Wilson MG
Heart; 2019 Jan; 105(2):152-159. PubMed ID: 30228247
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of Three Criteria for Interpretation of Electrocardiogram in the Military.
Dores H; Dinis P; Fernandes R; Barra S; Ferreira S; Silveira MC; Rocha E; Cardoso J; Monge J
Mil Med; 2017 Nov; 182(11):e2041-e2045. PubMed ID: 29087878
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Performance of the American Heart Association ( AHA ) 14-Point Evaluation Versus Electrocardiography for the Cardiovascular Screening of High School Athletes: A Prospective Study.
Williams EA; Pelto HF; Toresdahl BG; Prutkin JM; Owens DS; Salerno JC; Harmon KG; Drezner JA
J Am Heart Assoc; 2019 Jul; 8(14):e012235. PubMed ID: 31286819
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Electrocardiographic abnormalities in elite high school athletes: comparison to adolescent hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.
Thompson AJ; Cannon BC; Wackel PL; Horner JM; Ackerman MJ; O'Leary PW; Eidem BW; Johnson JN
Br J Sports Med; 2016 Jan; 50(2):105-10. PubMed ID: 26729893
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Performance of the 2010 European Society of Cardiology criteria for ECG interpretation in athletes.
Weiner RB; Hutter AM; Wang F; Kim JH; Wood MJ; Wang TJ; Picard MH; Baggish AL
Heart; 2011 Oct; 97(19):1573-7. PubMed ID: 21602522
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The Seattle Criteria increase the specificity of preparticipation ECG screening among elite athletes.
Brosnan M; La Gerche A; Kalman J; Lo W; Fallon K; MacIsaac A; Prior D
Br J Sports Med; 2014 Aug; 48(15):1144-50. PubMed ID: 23813487
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Electrocardiogram interpretation in NCAA athletes: Comparison of the 'Seattle' and 'International' criteria.
Hyde N; Prutkin JM; Drezner JA
J Electrocardiol; 2019; 56():81-84. PubMed ID: 31326858
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The differences in electrocardiogram interpretation in top-level athletes.
Jakubiak AA; Burkhard-Jagodzińska K; Król W; Konopka M; Bursa D; Sitkowski D; Kuch M; Braksator W
Kardiol Pol; 2017; 75(6):535-544. PubMed ID: 28181210
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Is there evidence for mandating electrocardiogram as part of the pre-participation examination?
Borjesson M; Dellborg M
Clin J Sport Med; 2011 Jan; 21(1):13-7. PubMed ID: 21200165
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Significance of false negative electrocardiograms in preparticipation screening of athletes for hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.
Rowin EJ; Maron BJ; Appelbaum E; Link MS; Gibson CM; Lesser JR; Haas TS; Udelson JE; Manning WJ; Maron MS
Am J Cardiol; 2012 Oct; 110(7):1027-32. PubMed ID: 22809754
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Electrocardiogram interpretation in college athletes: Local institution versus sports cardiology center interpretation.
Petek BJ; Drezner JA; Prutkin JM; Owens DS; Tran T; Harmon KG
J Electrocardiol; 2020; 62():49-56. PubMed ID: 32814150
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The ECG of high-level junior soccer players: comparing the ESC vs. the Seattle criteria.
Bessem B; de Bruijn MC; Nieuwland W
Br J Sports Med; 2015 Aug; 49(15):1000-6. PubMed ID: 25208724
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Cardiovascular screening in college athletes with and without electrocardiography: A cross-sectional study.
Baggish AL; Hutter AM; Wang F; Yared K; Weiner RB; Kupperman E; Picard MH; Wood MJ
Ann Intern Med; 2010 Mar; 152(5):269-75. PubMed ID: 20194232
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Optimal Screening Methods to Detect Cardiac Disorders in Athletes: An Evidence-Based Review.
Winkelmann ZK; Crossway AK
J Athl Train; 2017 Dec; 52(12):1168-1170. PubMed ID: 29154691
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The 12-lead electrocardiogram of the elite female footballer as defined by different interpretation criteria across the competitive season.
Morrison B; Mohammad A; Oxborough D; Somauroo J; Lindsay S; Drane AL; Shave R; George K
Eur J Sport Sci; 2022 Oct; 22(10):1475-1483. PubMed ID: 34374331
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of three current sets of electrocardiographic interpretation criteria for use in screening athletes.
Riding NR; Sheikh N; Adamuz C; Watt V; Farooq A; Whyte GP; George KP; Drezner JA; Sharma S; Wilson MG
Heart; 2015 Mar; 101(5):384-90. PubMed ID: 25502812
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
