These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

116 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31996733)

  • 1. A compression transmission device for the evaluation of bonding strength of biocompatible microfluidic and biochip materials and systems.
    Kratz SRA; Bachmann B; Spitz S; Höll G; Eilenberger C; Goeritz H; Ertl P; Rothbauer M
    Sci Rep; 2020 Jan; 10(1):1400. PubMed ID: 31996733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Characterization of four functional biocompatible pressure-sensitive adhesives for rapid prototyping of cell-based lab-on-a-chip and organ-on-a-chip systems.
    Kratz SRA; Eilenberger C; Schuller P; Bachmann B; Spitz S; Ertl P; Rothbauer M
    Sci Rep; 2019 Jun; 9(1):9287. PubMed ID: 31243326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Adhesive bonding strategies to fabricate high-strength and transparent 3D printed microfluidic device.
    Kecili S; Tekin HC
    Biomicrofluidics; 2020 Mar; 14(2):024113. PubMed ID: 32341724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluation of micro-tensile, shear and tensile tests determining the bond strength of three adhesive systems.
    Cardoso PE; Braga RR; Carrilho MR
    Dent Mater; 1998 Nov; 14(6):394-8. PubMed ID: 10483400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Variables related to materials and preparing for bond strength testing irrespective of the test protocol.
    Mair L; Padipatvuthikul P
    Dent Mater; 2010 Feb; 26(2):e17-23. PubMed ID: 20074788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Microfluidically supported biochip design for culture of endothelial cell layers with improved perfusion conditions.
    Raasch M; Rennert K; Jahn T; Peters S; Henkel T; Huber O; Schulz I; Becker H; Lorkowski S; Funke H; Mosig A
    Biofabrication; 2015 Mar; 7(1):015013. PubMed ID: 25727374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Shear bond strength between feldspathic CAD/CAM ceramic and human dentine for two adhesive cements.
    Graiff L; Piovan C; Vigolo P; Mason PN
    J Prosthodont; 2008 Jun; 17(4):294-9. PubMed ID: 18266655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Bioinspired layered materials with superior mechanical performance.
    Cheng Q; Jiang L; Tang Z
    Acc Chem Res; 2014 Apr; 47(4):1256-66. PubMed ID: 24635413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A doubly cross-linked nano-adhesive for the reliable sealing of flexible microfluidic devices.
    You JB; Min KI; Lee B; Kim DP; Im SG
    Lab Chip; 2013 Apr; 13(7):1266-72. PubMed ID: 23381132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. New method for the in vitro evaluation of dental alloy bonding systems.
    Padrós JL; Padrós E; Keogh TP; Monterrubio M
    J Prosthet Dent; 2000 Aug; 84(2):217-21. PubMed ID: 10946342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Peel bond strength between 3D printing tray materials and elastomeric impression/adhesive systems: A laboratory study.
    Xu Y; Huettig F; Schille C; Schweizer E; Geis-Gerstorfer J; Spintzyk S
    Dent Mater; 2020 Jul; 36(7):e241-e254. PubMed ID: 32456949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of shear and flexural bond strength tests versus failure modes of dentin bonding systems.
    Dunn WJ; Söderholm KJ
    Am J Dent; 2001 Oct; 14(5):297-303. PubMed ID: 11803994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A practical approach for the optimization of channel integrity in the sealing of shallow microfluidic devices made from cyclic olefin polymer.
    Ganser P; Baum C; Chargin D; Sauer-Budge AF; Sharon A
    Biomed Microdevices; 2018 Feb; 20(2):24. PubMed ID: 29478142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effects of two silane coupling agents, a bonding agent, and thermal cycling on the bond strength of a CAD/CAM composite material cemented with two resin luting agents.
    Yoshida K; Kamada K; Atsuta M
    J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Feb; 85(2):184-9. PubMed ID: 11208209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evaluation of adhesion of chairside hard relining materials to denture base polymers.
    Mutluay MM; Ruyter IE
    J Prosthet Dent; 2005 Nov; 94(5):445-52. PubMed ID: 16275305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Off-Stoichiometry Thiol-Ene Polymers: Inclusion of Anchor Groups Using Allylsilanes.
    Puchnin K; Ryazantsev D; Latipov E; Grudtsov V; Kuznetsov A
    Polymers (Basel); 2023 Mar; 15(6):. PubMed ID: 36987110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Microfluidic device fabrication mediated by surface chemical bonding.
    Sivakumar R; Lee NY
    Analyst; 2020 Jun; 145(12):4096-4110. PubMed ID: 32451519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Interfacial sealing between normal dentin and caries-affected dentin with glass-ceramic and three types of bonding systems.
    Wu Z; Li F; Liu C; Si X
    Am J Dent; 2019 Oct; 32(5):260-264. PubMed ID: 31675196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evaluation of debonding characteristics of a new collapsible ceramic bracket.
    Bishara SE; Olsen ME; Von Wald L
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1997 Nov; 112(5):552-9. PubMed ID: 9387843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Simple and low-cost production of hybrid 3D-printed microfluidic devices.
    Duong LH; Chen PC
    Biomicrofluidics; 2019 Mar; 13(2):024108. PubMed ID: 31065307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.