BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

222 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31996867)

  • 1. Magnesium versus poly-L-lactic acid bioresorbable scaffolds: in vivo optical coherence tomography comparison of mechanical performance.
    Abellás-Sequeiros RA; Ocaranza-Sanchez R; Galvaõ-Braga C; Marques J; Gonzalez-Juanatey C
    Arch Cardiol Mex; 2020; 90(1):8-15. PubMed ID: 31996867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Incidence and imaging outcomes of acute scaffold disruption and late structural discontinuity after implantation of the absorb Everolimus-Eluting fully bioresorbable vascular scaffold: optical coherence tomography assessment in the ABSORB cohort B Trial (A Clinical Evaluation of the Bioabsorbable Everolimus Eluting Coronary Stent System in the Treatment of Patients With De Novo Native Coronary Artery Lesions).
    Onuma Y; Serruys PW; Muramatsu T; Nakatani S; van Geuns RJ; de Bruyne B; Dudek D; Christiansen E; Smits PC; Chevalier B; McClean D; Koolen J; Windecker S; Whitbourn R; Meredith I; Garcia-Garcia HM; Veldhof S; Rapoza R; Ormiston JA
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2014 Dec; 7(12):1400-11. PubMed ID: 25523532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Two-year clinical, angiographic, and serial optical coherence tomographic follow-up after implantation of an everolimus-eluting bioresorbable scaffold and an everolimus-eluting metallic stent: insights from the randomised ABSORB Japan trial.
    Onuma Y; Sotomi Y; Shiomi H; Ozaki Y; Namiki A; Yasuda S; Ueno T; Ando K; Furuya J; Igarashi K; Kozuma K; Tanabe K; Kusano H; Rapoza R; Popma JJ; Stone GW; Simonton C; Serruys PW; Kimura T
    EuroIntervention; 2016 Oct; 12(9):1090-1101. PubMed ID: 27597270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Serial invasive imaging follow-up of the first clinical experience with the Magmaris magnesium bioresorbable scaffold.
    Tovar Forero MN; van Zandvoort L; Masdjedi K; Diletti R; Wilschut J; de Jaegere PP; Zijlstra F; Van Mieghem NM; Daemen J
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2020 Feb; 95(2):226-231. PubMed ID: 31033171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effect of non-compliant balloon postdilatation on magnesium-based bioresorbable vascular scaffolds.
    Blachutzik F; Achenbach S; Tröbs M; Marwan M; Weissner M; Nef H; Schlundt C
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2019 Feb; 93(2):202-207. PubMed ID: 30196573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Fate of post-procedural malapposition of everolimus-eluting polymeric bioresorbable scaffold and everolimus-eluting cobalt chromium metallic stent in human coronary arteries: sequential assessment with optical coherence tomography in ABSORB Japan trial.
    Sotomi Y; Onuma Y; Dijkstra J; Miyazaki Y; Kozuma K; Tanabe K; Popma JJ; de Winter RJ; Serruys PW; Kimura T
    Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2018 Jan; 19(1):59-66. PubMed ID: 28158421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A next-generation bioresorbable coronary scaffold system: from bench to first clinical evaluation: 6- and 12-month clinical and multimodality imaging results.
    Verheye S; Ormiston JA; Stewart J; Webster M; Sanidas E; Costa R; Costa JR; Chamie D; Abizaid AS; Pinto I; Morrison L; Toyloy S; Bhat V; Yan J; Abizaid A
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2014 Jan; 7(1):89-99. PubMed ID: 24139932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A Randomized Trial Comparing the NeoVas Sirolimus-Eluting Bioresorbable Scaffold and Metallic Everolimus-Eluting Stents.
    Han Y; Xu B; Fu G; Wang X; Xu K; Jin C; Tao L; Li L; Hou Y; Su X; Fang Q; Chen L; Liu H; Wang B; Yuan Z; Gao C; Zhou S; Sun Z; Zhao Y; Guan C; Stone GW;
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2018 Feb; 11(3):260-272. PubMed ID: 29413240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Bioresorbable vascular scaffolds in coronary chronic total occlusions revascularization: safety assessment related to struts coverage and apposition in 6-month OCT follow-up.
    Abellas-Sequeiros RA; Ocaranza-Sanchez R; Trillo-Nouche R; Gonzalez-Juanatey C; Gonzalez-Juanatey JR
    Heart Vessels; 2017 Sep; 32(9):1077-1084. PubMed ID: 28432385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Early outcome of magnesium bioresorbable scaffold implantation in acute coronary syndrome-the initial report from the Magmaris-ACS registry.
    Wlodarczak A; Lanocha M; Jastrzebski A; Pecherzewski M; Szudrowicz M; Jastrzebski W; Nawrot J; Lesiak M
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2019 Apr; 93(5):E287-E292. PubMed ID: 30537203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Mechanical properties of the drug-eluting bioresorbable magnesium scaffold compared with polymeric scaffolds and a permanent metallic drug-eluting stent.
    Barkholt TØ; Webber B; Holm NR; Ormiston JA
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2020 Dec; 96(7):E674-E682. PubMed ID: 31710149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Randomized Comparison of Absorb Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffold and Mirage Microfiber Sirolimus-Eluting Scaffold Using Multimodality Imaging.
    Tenekecioglu E; Serruys PW; Onuma Y; Costa R; Chamié D; Sotomi Y; Yu TB; Abizaid A; Liew HB; Santoso T
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2017 Jun; 10(11):1115-1130. PubMed ID: 28527768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Magmaris Resorbable Magnesium Scaffold Versus Conventional Drug-Eluting Stent in ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction: 1-Year Results of a Propensity-Score-Matching Comparison.
    de Hemptinne Q; Xaplanteris P; Guédès A; Demeure F; Vandeloo B; Dugauquier C; Picard F; Warne DW; Pilgrim T; Iglesias JF; Bennett J
    Cardiovasc Revasc Med; 2022 Oct; 43():28-35. PubMed ID: 35641364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of acute expansion of bioresorbable vascular scaffolds versus metallic drug-eluting stents in different degrees of calcification: An Optical Coherence Tomography Study.
    Ming Fam J; van Der Sijde JN; Karanasos A; Felix C; Diletti R; van Mieghem N; de Jaegere P; Zijlstra F; Jan van Geuns R; Regar E
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2017 Apr; 89(5):798-810. PubMed ID: 27717119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Optical coherence tomography-guided versus angiography-guided implantation of everolimus-eluting bioresorbable vascular scaffolds: Comparison of coverage, apposition and clinical outcome. The ALSTER-OCT ABSORB registry.
    Heeger CH; Schedifka AS; Meincke F; Spangenberg T; Wienemann H; Kreidel F; Kuck KH; Ghanem A; Bergmann MW
    Cardiol J; 2018; 25(4):459-469. PubMed ID: 29512092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Impact of strut thickness on acute mechanical performance: A comparison study using optical coherence tomography between DESolve 150 and DESolve 100.
    Boeder NF; Dörr O; Bauer T; Mattesini A; Elsässer A; Liebetrau C; Achenbach S; Hamm CW; Nef HM
    Int J Cardiol; 2017 Nov; 246():74-79. PubMed ID: 28579164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A bioresorbable everolimus-eluting scaffold versus a metallic everolimus-eluting stent for ischaemic heart disease caused by de-novo native coronary artery lesions (ABSORB II): an interim 1-year analysis of clinical and procedural secondary outcomes from a randomised controlled trial.
    Serruys PW; Chevalier B; Dudek D; Cequier A; Carrié D; Iniguez A; Dominici M; van der Schaaf RJ; Haude M; Wasungu L; Veldhof S; Peng L; Staehr P; Grundeken MJ; Ishibashi Y; Garcia-Garcia HM; Onuma Y
    Lancet; 2015 Jan; 385(9962):43-54. PubMed ID: 25230593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. An observational study of clinical outcomes of everolimus-eluting bioresorbable scaffolds comparing the procedural use of optical coherence tomography against angiography alone.
    Hamshere S; Byrne A; Guttmann O; Rees P; Bourantas C; Weerakody R; Wragg A; Knight C; Mathur A; Jones DA
    Coron Artery Dis; 2018 Sep; 29(6):482-488. PubMed ID: 29642228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Neointimal Healing Evaluated by Optical Coherence Tomography after Drug-Eluting Absorbable Metal Scaffold Implantation in de novo Native Coronary Lesions: Rationale and Design of the Magmaris-OCT Study.
    Karjalainen P; Paana T; Sia J; Nammas W
    Cardiology; 2017; 137(4):225-230. PubMed ID: 28467998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Real-World Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffold Experience Compared With Second-Generation Metallic Drug-Eluting Stents in Complex Coronary Lesions.
    Okamoto N; Ueda H; Yoshimura T; Chamaria S; Bhatheja S; Vengrenyuk Y; Rabiei S; Barrientos Y; Kapur V; Barman N; Sweeny J; Baber U; Mehran R; Sharma SK; Kini AS
    J Invasive Cardiol; 2018 Jul; 30(7):251-255. PubMed ID: 29656280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.