154 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31997388)
1. A fair comparison of tree-based and parametric methods in multiple imputation by chained equations.
Slade E; Naylor MG
Stat Med; 2020 Apr; 39(8):1156-1166. PubMed ID: 31997388
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of random forest and parametric imputation models for imputing missing data using MICE: a CALIBER study.
Shah AD; Bartlett JW; Carpenter J; Nicholas O; Hemingway H
Am J Epidemiol; 2014 Mar; 179(6):764-74. PubMed ID: 24589914
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. MISL: Multiple imputation by super learning.
Carpenito T; Manjourides J
Stat Methods Med Res; 2022 Oct; 31(10):1904-1915. PubMed ID: 35658622
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. SuperMICE: An Ensemble Machine Learning Approach to Multiple Imputation by Chained Equations.
Laqueur HS; Shev AB; Kagawa RMC
Am J Epidemiol; 2022 Feb; 191(3):516-525. PubMed ID: 34788362
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Logistic regression vs. predictive mean matching for imputing binary covariates.
Austin PC; van Buuren S
Stat Methods Med Res; 2023 Nov; 32(11):2172-2183. PubMed ID: 37750213
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A wide range of missing imputation approaches in longitudinal data: a simulation study and real data analysis.
Jahangiri M; Kazemnejad A; Goldfeld KS; Daneshpour MS; Mostafaei S; Khalili D; Moghadas MR; Akbarzadeh M
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2023 Jul; 23(1):161. PubMed ID: 37415114
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Multiple imputation for longitudinal data using Bayesian lasso imputation model.
Yamaguchi Y; Yoshida S; Misumi T; Maruo K
Stat Med; 2022 Mar; 41(6):1042-1058. PubMed ID: 35064581
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Accuracy of random-forest-based imputation of missing data in the presence of non-normality, non-linearity, and interaction.
Hong S; Lynn HS
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2020 Jul; 20(1):199. PubMed ID: 32711455
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A comparison of existing methods for multiple imputation in individual participant data meta-analysis.
Kunkel D; Kaizar EE
Stat Med; 2017 Sep; 36(22):3507-3532. PubMed ID: 28695667
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Multiple imputation for handling missing outcome data when estimating the relative risk.
Sullivan TR; Lee KJ; Ryan P; Salter AB
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2017 Sep; 17(1):134. PubMed ID: 28877666
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Appropriate inclusion of interactions was needed to avoid bias in multiple imputation.
Tilling K; Williamson EJ; Spratt M; Sterne JA; Carpenter JR
J Clin Epidemiol; 2016 Dec; 80():107-115. PubMed ID: 27445178
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Multiple imputation with missing data indicators.
Beesley LJ; Bondarenko I; Elliot MR; Kurian AW; Katz SJ; Taylor JM
Stat Methods Med Res; 2021 Dec; 30(12):2685-2700. PubMed ID: 34643465
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Non-parametric approach for frequentist multiple imputation in survival analysis with missing covariates.
Takeuchi Y; Ogawa M; Hagiwara Y; Matsuyama Y
Stat Methods Med Res; 2021 Jul; 30(7):1691-1707. PubMed ID: 34110942
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Imputing missing covariates in time-to-event analysis within distributed research networks: A simulation study.
Li D; Wong J; Li X; Toh S; Wang R
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf; 2023 Mar; 32(3):330-340. PubMed ID: 36380400
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Multiple imputation with sequential penalized regression.
Zahid FM; Heumann C
Stat Methods Med Res; 2019 May; 28(5):1311-1327. PubMed ID: 29451087
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Multiple imputation by chained equations for systematically and sporadically missing multilevel data.
Resche-Rigon M; White IR
Stat Methods Med Res; 2018 Jun; 27(6):1634-1649. PubMed ID: 27647809
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Multiple imputation methods for handling missing values in a longitudinal categorical variable with restrictions on transitions over time: a simulation study.
De Silva AP; Moreno-Betancur M; De Livera AM; Lee KJ; Simpson JA
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2019 Jan; 19(1):14. PubMed ID: 30630434
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A bias-corrected estimator in multiple imputation for missing data.
Tomita H; Fujisawa H; Henmi M
Stat Med; 2018 Oct; 37(23):3373-3386. PubMed ID: 29845646
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Performance of Multiple Imputation Using Modern Machine Learning Methods in Electronic Health Records Data.
Getz K; Hubbard RA; Linn KA
Epidemiology; 2023 Mar; 34(2):206-215. PubMed ID: 36722803
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Relative efficiency of joint-model and full-conditional-specification multiple imputation when conditional models are compatible: The general location model.
Seaman SR; Hughes RA
Stat Methods Med Res; 2018 Jun; 27(6):1603-1614. PubMed ID: 27597798
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
