These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

38 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31998189)

  • 1. Assessing Item-Level Fit for the DINA Model.
    Wang C; Shu Z; Shang Z; Xu G
    Appl Psychol Meas; 2015 Oct; 39(7):525-538. PubMed ID: 29881024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A Semi-supervised Learning-Based Diagnostic Classification Method Using Artificial Neural Networks.
    Xue K; Bradshaw LP
    Front Psychol; 2020; 11():618336. PubMed ID: 33551928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A Constrained Metropolis-Hastings Robbins-Monro Algorithm for Q Matrix Estimation in DINA Models.
    Liu CW; Andersson B; Skrondal A
    Psychometrika; 2020 Jun; 85(2):322-357. PubMed ID: 32632838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Diagnostic Classification Models for Testlets: Methods and Theory.
    Xu X; Fang G; Guo J; Ying Z; Zhang S
    Psychometrika; 2024 Mar; ():. PubMed ID: 38528268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Estimating Cognitive Diagnosis Models in Small Samples: Bayes Modal Estimation and Monotonic Constraints.
    Ma W; Jiang Z
    Appl Psychol Meas; 2021 Mar; 45(2):95-111. PubMed ID: 33627916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Sufficient and Necessary Conditions for the Identifiability of DINA Models with Polytomous Responses.
    Lin M; Xu G
    Psychometrika; 2024 Jun; 89(2):717-740. PubMed ID: 38517594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Assessing Change in Latent Skills Across Time With Longitudinal Cognitive Diagnosis Modeling: An Evaluation of Model Performance.
    Kaya Y; Leite WL
    Educ Psychol Meas; 2017 Jun; 77(3):369-388. PubMed ID: 29795918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Relating violations of measurement invariance to group differences in response times.
    Molenaar D; Feskens R
    Psychol Methods; 2024 Apr; ():. PubMed ID: 38573663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Identifying Disengaged Responding in Multiple-Choice Items: Extending a Latent Class Item Response Model With Novel Process Data Indicators.
    Welling J; Gnambs T; Carstensen CH
    Educ Psychol Meas; 2024 Apr; 84(2):314-339. PubMed ID: 38898880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A Testlet Diagnostic Classification Model with Attribute Hierarchies.
    Ma W; Wang C; Xiao J
    Appl Psychol Meas; 2023 May; 47(3):183-199. PubMed ID: 37113526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Explanatory Cognitive Diagnosis Models Incorporating Item Features.
    Liao M; Jiao H; He Q
    J Intell; 2024 Mar; 12(3):. PubMed ID: 38535166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Psychometric Consequences of Subpopulation Item Parameter Drift.
    Huggins-Manley AC
    Educ Psychol Meas; 2017 Jan; 77(1):143-164. PubMed ID: 29795907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The Impact of Q-Matrix Designs on Diagnostic Classification Accuracy in the Presence of Attribute Hierarchies.
    Liu R; Huggins-Manley AC; Bradshaw L
    Educ Psychol Meas; 2017 Apr; 77(2):220-240. PubMed ID: 29795911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Partially Compensatory Multidimensional Item Response Theory Models: Two Alternate Model Forms.
    DeMars CE
    Educ Psychol Meas; 2016 Apr; 76(2):231-257. PubMed ID: 29795864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Reconsidering Cutoff Points in the General Method of Empirical Q-Matrix Validation.
    Nájera P; Sorrel MA; Abad FJ
    Educ Psychol Meas; 2019 Aug; 79(4):727-753. PubMed ID: 32655181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A Markov Estimation Strategy for Longitudinal Learning Diagnosis: Providing Timely Diagnostic Feedback.
    Zhan P
    Educ Psychol Meas; 2020 Dec; 80(6):1145-1167. PubMed ID: 33116330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Examining Parameter Invariance in a General Diagnostic Classification Model.
    Ravand H; Baghaei P; Doebler P
    Front Psychol; 2019; 10():2930. PubMed ID: 31998189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The accuracy and consistency of mastery for each content domain using the Rasch and deterministic inputs, noisy “and” gate diagnostic classification models: a simulation study and a real-world analysis using data from the Korean Medical Licensing Examination.
    Seo DG; Kim JK
    J Educ Eval Health Prof; 2021; 18():15. PubMed ID: 34225413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Model Selection for Cogitative Diagnostic Analysis of the Reading Comprehension Test.
    Liu H; Bian Y
    Front Psychol; 2021; 12():644764. PubMed ID: 34504454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 2.