These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

160 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31999029)

  • 1. Evaluation of contrast-enhanced digital mammography (CEDM) in the preoperative staging of breast cancer: Large-scale single-center experience.
    Bicchierai G; Tonelli P; Piacenti A; De Benedetto D; Boeri C; Vanzi E; Bianchi S; Cirone D; Kaur Gill M; Miele V; Nori J
    Breast J; 2020 Jul; 26(7):1276-1283. PubMed ID: 31999029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Preoperative loco-regional staging of invasive lobular carcinoma with contrast-enhanced digital mammography (CEDM).
    Amato F; Bicchierai G; Cirone D; Depretto C; Di Naro F; Vanzi E; Scaperrotta G; Bartolotta TV; Miele V; Nori J
    Radiol Med; 2019 Dec; 124(12):1229-1237. PubMed ID: 31773458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Digital breast tomosynthesis and contrast-enhanced dual-energy digital mammography alone and in combination compared to 2D digital synthetized mammography and MR imaging in breast cancer detection and classification.
    Petrillo A; Fusco R; Vallone P; Filice S; Granata V; Petrosino T; Rosaria Rubulotta M; Setola SV; Mattace Raso M; Maio F; Raiano C; Siani C; Di Bonito M; Botti G
    Breast J; 2020 May; 26(5):860-872. PubMed ID: 31886607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Contrast Enhanced Digital Mammography (CEDM) Helps to Safely Reduce Benign Breast Biopsies for Low to Moderately Suspicious Soft Tissue Lesions.
    Zuley ML; Bandos AI; Abrams GS; Ganott MA; Gizienski TA; Hakim CM; Kelly AE; Nair BE; Sumkin JH; Waheed U; Gur D
    Acad Radiol; 2020 Jul; 27(7):969-976. PubMed ID: 31495761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Which clinical, radiological, histological, and molecular parameters are associated with the absence of enhancement of known breast cancers with Contrast Enhanced Digital Mammography (CEDM)?
    Bicchierai G; Amato F; Vanzi B; De Benedetto D; Boeri C; Vanzi E; Di Naro F; Bianchi S; Cirone D; Cozzi D; Miele V; Nori J
    Breast; 2020 Dec; 54():15-24. PubMed ID: 32889303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Clinical evaluation of contrast-enhanced digital mammography and contrast enhanced tomosynthesis--Comparison to contrast-enhanced breast MRI.
    Chou CP; Lewin JM; Chiang CL; Hung BH; Yang TL; Huang JS; Liao JB; Pan HB
    Eur J Radiol; 2015 Dec; 84(12):2501-8. PubMed ID: 26456307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Contrast-Enhanced Digital Mammography Screening for Intermediate-Risk Women With a History of Lobular Neoplasia.
    Hogan MP; Amir T; Sevilimedu V; Sung J; Morris EA; Jochelson MS
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2021 Jun; 216(6):1486-1491. PubMed ID: 33787291
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Contrast-Enhanced Digital Mammography in the Surgical Management of Breast Cancer.
    Ali-Mucheru M; Pockaj B; Patel B; Pizzitola V; Wasif N; Stucky CC; Gray R
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2016 Dec; 23(Suppl 5):649-655. PubMed ID: 27638679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Impact of preoperative staging with contrast-enhanced mammography for localized breast cancer management.
    Montrognon F; Clatot F; Berghian A; Douvrin F; Quieffin F; Defta D; Buquet A; Ferret M; Lequesne J; Leheurteur M; Fontanilles M; Georgescu D; Callonnec F
    Br J Radiol; 2022 Jun; 95(1134):20210765. PubMed ID: 35195454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Value Added of Preoperative Contrast-Enhanced Digital Mammography in Patients With Invasive Lobular Carcinoma of the Breast.
    Patel BK; Davis J; Ferraro C; Kosiorek H; Hasselbach K; Ocal T; Pockaj B
    Clin Breast Cancer; 2018 Dec; 18(6):e1339-e1345. PubMed ID: 30122347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Impact of background parenchymal enhancement levels on the diagnosis of contrast-enhanced digital mammography in evaluations of breast cancer: comparison with contrast-enhanced breast MRI.
    Yuen S; Monzawa S; Gose A; Yanai S; Yata Y; Matsumoto H; Ichinose Y; Tashiro T; Yamagami K
    Breast Cancer; 2022 Jul; 29(4):677-687. PubMed ID: 35220511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Architecture distortion score (ADS) in malignancy risk stratification of architecture distortion on contrast-enhanced digital mammography.
    Goh Y; Chan CW; Pillay P; Lee HS; Pan HB; Hung BH; Quek ST; Chou CP
    Eur Radiol; 2021 May; 31(5):2657-2666. PubMed ID: 33125555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Performance of Dual-Energy Contrast-enhanced Digital Mammography for Screening Women at Increased Risk of Breast Cancer.
    Sung JS; Lebron L; Keating D; D'Alessio D; Comstock CE; Lee CH; Pike MC; Ayhan M; Moskowitz CS; Morris EA; Jochelson MS
    Radiology; 2019 Oct; 293(1):81-88. PubMed ID: 31453765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of contrast-enhanced digital mammography and contrast-enhanced digital breast tomosynthesis for lesion assessment.
    Huang H; Scaduto DA; Liu C; Yang J; Zhu C; Rinaldi K; Eisenberg J; Liu J; Hoernig M; Wicklein J; Vogt S; Mertelmeier T; Fisher PR; Zhao W
    J Med Imaging (Bellingham); 2019 Jul; 6(3):031407. PubMed ID: 30766895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Assessing tumor extent on contrast-enhanced spectral mammography versus full-field digital mammography and ultrasound.
    Patel BK; Garza SA; Eversman S; Lopez-Alvarez Y; Kosiorek H; Pockaj BA
    Clin Imaging; 2017; 46():78-84. PubMed ID: 28750354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The PROCEM study protocol: Added value of preoperative contrast-enhanced mammography in staging of malignant breast lesions - a prospective randomized multicenter study.
    Åhsberg K; Gardfjell A; Nimeus E; Ryden L; Zackrisson S
    BMC Cancer; 2021 Oct; 21(1):1115. PubMed ID: 34663236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Diagnostic Value of Contrast-Enhanced Digital Mammography versus Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging for the Preoperative Evaluation of Breast Cancer.
    Kim EY; Youn I; Lee KH; Yun JS; Park YL; Park CH; Moon J; Choi SH; Choi YJ; Ham SY; Kook SH
    J Breast Cancer; 2018 Dec; 21(4):453-462. PubMed ID: 30607168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Contrast-enhanced Digital Mammography: A Single-Institution Experience of the First 208 Cases.
    Lewis TC; Pizzitola VJ; Giurescu ME; Eversman WG; Lorans R; Robinson KA; Patel BK
    Breast J; 2017 Jan; 23(1):67-76. PubMed ID: 27696576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Technique and clinical applications of dual-energy contrast-enhanced digital mammography (CEDM) in breast cancer evaluation: a pictorial essay.
    Sudhir R; Koppula V; Mandava A; Kamala S; Potlapalli A
    Diagn Interv Radiol; 2021 Jan; 27(1):28-36. PubMed ID: 33252334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of screening CEDM and MRI for women at increased risk for breast cancer: A pilot study.
    Jochelson MS; Pinker K; Dershaw DD; Hughes M; Gibbons GF; Rahbar K; Robson ME; Mangino DA; Goldman D; Moskowitz CS; Morris EA; Sung JS
    Eur J Radiol; 2017 Dec; 97():37-43. PubMed ID: 29153365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.