290 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31999159)
1. A word or two about nonwords: Frequency, semantic neighborhood density, and orthography-to-semantics consistency effects for nonwords in the lexical decision task.
Hendrix P; Sun CC
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2021 Jan; 47(1):157-183. PubMed ID: 31999159
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Neural correlates of lexical access during visual word recognition.
Binder JR; McKiernan KA; Parsons ME; Westbury CF; Possing ET; Kaufman JN; Buchanan L
J Cogn Neurosci; 2003 Apr; 15(3):372-93. PubMed ID: 12729490
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A dissociative word-frequency X levels-of-processing interaction in episodic recognition and lexical decision tasks.
Duchek JM; Neely JH
Mem Cognit; 1989 Mar; 17(2):148-62. PubMed ID: 2927313
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. From sound to meaning: Phonology-to-Semantics mapping in visual word recognition.
Amenta S; Marelli M; Sulpizio S
Psychon Bull Rev; 2017 Jun; 24(3):887-893. PubMed ID: 27572870
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A database of orthography-semantics consistency (OSC) estimates for 15,017 English words.
Marelli M; Amenta S
Behav Res Methods; 2018 Aug; 50(4):1482-1495. PubMed ID: 29372490
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. No enemies in the neighborhood: absence of inhibitory neighborhood effects in lexical decision and semantic categorization.
Forster KI; Shen D
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1996 May; 22(3):696-713. PubMed ID: 8656152
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [The influence of visualization of orthography on the recognition of written words].
Mathey S
Can J Exp Psychol; 2001 Mar; 55(1):1-23. PubMed ID: 11301725
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Responding to nonwords in the lexical decision task: Insights from the English Lexicon Project.
Yap MJ; Sibley DE; Balota DA; Ratcliff R; Rueckl J
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2015 May; 41(3):597-613. PubMed ID: 25329078
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Making things difficult in lexical decision: the impact of pseudohomophones and transposed-letter nonwords on frequency and semantic priming effects.
Lupker SJ; Pexman PM
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2010 Sep; 36(5):1267-89. PubMed ID: 20804296
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Cascaded versus noncascaded models of lexical and semantic processing: the turple effect.
Forster KI; Hector J
Mem Cognit; 2002 Oct; 30(7):1106-17. PubMed ID: 12507375
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Semantic transparency in free stems: The effect of Orthography-Semantics Consistency on word recognition.
Marelli M; Amenta S; Crepaldi D
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2015; 68(8):1571-83. PubMed ID: 25269473
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Many neighbors are not silent. fMRI evidence for global lexical activity in visual word recognition.
Braun M; Jacobs AM; Richlan F; Hawelka S; Hutzler F; Kronbichler M
Front Hum Neurosci; 2015; 9():423. PubMed ID: 26257634
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. On the semantics of nonwords and their lexical category.
Cassani G; Chuang YY; Baayen RH
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2020 Apr; 46(4):621-637. PubMed ID: 31318232
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Semantic, phonological, and mediated priming in reading and lexical decisions.
McNamara TP; Healy AF
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1988 Jul; 14(3):398-409. PubMed ID: 2969939
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A further examination of word frequency and age-of-acquisition effects in English lexical decision task performance: The role of frequency trajectory.
Juhasz BJ; Yap MJ; Raoul A; Kaye M
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2019 Jan; 45(1):82-96. PubMed ID: 29683706
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Beyond quantity of experience: Exploring the role of semantic consistency in Chinese character knowledge.
Hsieh CY; Marelli M; Rastle K
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2024 May; 50(5):819-832. PubMed ID: 37883046
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Neighborhood effects on nonword visual processing in a language with shallow orthography.
Arduino LS; Burani C
J Psycholinguist Res; 2004 Jan; 33(1):75-95. PubMed ID: 15002172
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Does CaSe-MiXinG disrupt the access to lexico-semantic information?
Perea M; Fernández-López M; Marcet A
Psychol Res; 2020 Jun; 84(4):981-989. PubMed ID: 30370458
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The turple effect is modulated by base word frequency: implications for models of lexical and semantic access.
Mulatti C; Cembrani V; Peressotti F; Job R
Psychon Bull Rev; 2008 Dec; 15(6):1078-82. PubMed ID: 19001570
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Sensitivity to orthographic vs. phonological constraints on word recognition: An ERP study with deaf and hearing readers.
Lee B; Martinez PM; Midgley KJ; Holcomb PJ; Emmorey K
Neuropsychologia; 2022 Dec; 177():108420. PubMed ID: 36396091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
